Sentences with phrase «stupid points like»

But stupid points like these are easily forgiven in such a great film.

It's wide open, and I'm just hoping that we don't drop stupid points like we did in recent weeks to West Brom and Norwich.

Not exact matches

The other point is ultra-easy monetary policy, with the Bank of Japan doing «stupid things» like negative interest rates and QE this probably serves to help keep businesses on life support; delaying the inevitable.

@JohnQuest — with the prevelance of cellphone cameras and quick posting to sites like youtube these days and all the police brutality and other unlawful activity videos going up on a daily basis involving police, I would be surprised if the percentage of police force that are corrupt, underqualified, discriminatory and just plain stupid is not only a lot higher than 5.0 % but also extends into the higher - ups of the system that are harder to pin - point.

«I never, ever want to get to the point where I don't feel it, and I don't care if it's something stupid or something serious... like that's a heavy thing to have people accuse your entire church of horrible things because of a sound bite.»

Northern IL University... this liberal arts campus, just 60 miles west of Chicago, had an extrajudicial neutralization running through one of its remote facilities where the instructors liked to tell students they were spies with guns pointed to their heads for absolutely no reason while the rest of the class just watched with stupid grins..

You can say that you don't like the way Tom Tom makes points and say that she lacks integrity, but to throw Jen into there because she's defending Tom Tom's free speech is a stupid, and illogical position.

The point is, if god wanted to forgive people, he can just do it; to make it contingent upon us believing in a bunch of stupid fairy tales that can't be proved at all — just like the god of the fairy tale — is incredibly stupid of him..

At this point I'm willing to address a logical argument for the existence of a god unless it's something stupid like Kalam or TAG.

And don't worry about little fvckwads like Open Mouth who can't debate one little point of yours and so they bring up a mistake from yesterday or some stupid sh!t..

-- Clueless tactics, stupid team selection and pointless standing by the outline to get 1 point with psychologicaly ruined, with no desire to play at all team against S ***** team like PSG?

this is the sort of mentality you probably haven't read it properly and jumping all over just like after a bad result you do, of course winning something is very important and it is directly related to progress if your view is taken then no football club is progress the fact that they got relegated don't cancel out the fact that they won a trophy and winning something is always good don't tell that u weren't relieved when that trophy monkey got off our back so don't talk stupid talk with relevant points.

That sounds like a stupid question, considering they are seven points clear and, as mentioned, have used fewer players than any of their rivals.

That's not only because dropping more points like what happened two weekends ago before that stupid thing known as an international break arrived and bored us out of our respective minds.

Given how Chelsea have struggled against Burnley and Hull, as long as Arsenal don't play stupid like they did against us, I would have some money on them for a point at least!

I think the biggest selling point of the Flameless Luminary is that it does not look like a room fresher like the stupid little Sense and Spray thingy.

«Eventually, I just got to a point where I was like «This is stupid,» sitting around hating myself,» Kayla says.

This game is so stupid, for you guys that don't know this a tony hawk based game where the objective is to try to get the most points possible this game is trying to be funny with stupid glitches that happen ALL THE TIME a game based on glitches is just plain stupid its not funny if a game tries to be glitchy and glitches happen all the time but it is funny when i game tries to be serious and something crazy happens like your person all of suddens fly's into space now thats funny and you need an amazing computer to play this game over all this is a no - funny stupid game

What's really sad though is that many anti-Gamecube people (mainly Xbox owners) have degraded themselves to the point of stupid insults and saying negative quotes like «over-hyped» and «copying Halo».

by Walter Chaw The stupid version of Groundhog Day, or, more to the point, the capering warm - up act for Charlie Kaufman's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, the latest Adam Sandler vehicle 50 First Dates is just like almost every other alleged comedy released in the first quarter of any year in that lacks pace and energy.

Judged on looks — both inside and out — you'd have to say the SEAT is a bit of a let - down, to the point where it looks like a regular Ibiza with optional rims and a stupid exhaust finisher that has two pea - shooters poking from an ugly surround.

For a plant person, Rosethorn could sound like iron when she made a point with someone stupid.

Right, this might sound like a stupid question, but is the top (original) image absolutely, definitely «in - game» and more to the point, is it a «target render» or not?

The point is that like long Canadian Winters, sometimes the beauty and novelty of 82 hour RPGs or 82 game NHL seasons starts to wear thin, and stupid fun like Peggle can melt away gaming fatigue like seeing blossoms on trees that you forgot were alive.

If you're not familiar with Dynasty Warriors, it has the player take to an open battlefield to complete various objectives like capturing strategic points and keeping AI counterparts alive, all while running around obliterating hordes of extremely stupid enemies.

Even local developers are making games for US audiences and that really pisses me off so much, not because of nationalism, I have no quarrel with any country and I know they do it to play it «safe», but the idea of simply missing the chance to develop your own market because you want to play with the «big boys» is not only stupid from a marketing point of view, it's downright dangerous, you CA N'T compete with monster - like comapnies unless you are big enough yourself, you are just gonna get swallowed and turned into another subsidiary for EA before you get to make anything that's worth remembering, and worse, before you make anything that makes you happy as a developer.

But for those that do they are going to want to go out and get other people to play the game so that the they can sit next to them and just point out how stupid they are... But if you liked Portal and enjoyed those games then Magrunner: Dark Pulse is definitely something you should at least check out and give it a few hours to see how that works out for you.

It's not that the advice given was poor or inaccurate so much as it was beginner - level advice (which admittedly, a lot of indie developers still really need to hear): stuff like use conventions to playtest & network, make sure your game has a unique selling point & sounds exciting when summarized in a single sentence, don't pick a stupid name for your game, etc..

Now, overall the game is rather easy and simple, but there are points where you'll do something stupid and lose 100 pikmin at once (like drowning them for instance).

But the combat sucked, cars handled poorly, missions were tedious and sometimes scripted so precisely that it didn't feel like you were playing a game, it kept trying to get you to play stupid darts and pool games that were simply not fun, they had these TV shows that missed the point of an interactive medium, and the game overall just was a mess and, personally, not very fun.

You can shoot someone with a shotgun 20 times before they are «defeated», at which point a cutscene plays and they actually get killed by something stupid, like something falling on their head.

Of course most scientists don't like the grandiose claims that imply they have been stupid and that's the point — good science can be and is rejected only because it implies that the orthodoxy has been stupid.

To comment on a particular point of the original article — what kind of a stupid idea: Because the economists failed to establish an equally important body like the IPCC is, one of them demands to shut it down and re-establish it under the Bretton Woods institutions, and he does so with an absolutely unprofessional conglomeration of wild assumptions, even mixing up the IPCC and the Kyoto Protocol.

None of those points were altogether wrong, but I still couldn't help but feel like poor little stupid Forrest Gump getting on the school bus for the first time and hearing «you can't sit here» over and over.

In addition, Ron Friedmann points out reasons like the negative incentives to try out new ideas; what might be called the «if it ain't broke don't fix it» syndrome; fear of looking stupid; the difficulty of taking responsibility; the (real or imagined) negative response of clients; etc..

You can always talk them into giving you a steep fine for some bogus non-moving violation (or a moving violation with fewer points - like «failure to yield to a traffic control device» instead of speeding 98 in a 65... true story from when I was 18 and stupid).