Sentences with phrase «style if need be»

Not exact matches

If you're interested in starting a limousine service, do you need to be up late at night when being a night owl isn't your usual style?

«With a German audience, I need to be more fact based up front and have a more disciplined presentation style to build a case, almost as if I were in a courtroom.

How to Change Your Management Style: Recognizing Your Management Style Before deciding to change your management, you need to identify what type of manager you are and determine if a change is needed.

If you are changing your management style, you need to first assess and make the changes yourself (internally, without notification to your employees).

If managers are to succeed at engaging their Millennials, their leadership style needs to become more coach - centric.

If I'm writing content, do I need to be more familiar with AP Style?

Now that you know the most enticing features online stock trading has to offer, you should also know the negative aspects of online trading so you can determine if it's a strategy that will truly fit your needs and style.

When you treat the prospect as intelligent, base your business on ethics, and actually anticipate those prospects needs, your growth can be exponential — but if you use old - style interruption - oriented marketing that insults your prospects, you're writing a recipe for failure

If your business doesn't have travel needs or you just want simple cash back, the Capital One Spark Cash Select for Business might be more your style.

If you like the style of the original Echo, but don't need the smart hub functionality of the $ 150 Echo Plus, this is your chance to get a device that probably won't be available for too much longer.

For example, if one of the perks is a T - shirt, having too many colors and styles could make fulfillment more difficult than it needs to be.

If style can be attributed to some aspects of reality independent of man — Camus need not attribute beauty to all aspects of nature — without reference to an «artist - God,» then a naturalistic or pantheistic interpretation of Camus is possible.

So Alpha - style statements like, in the first video: «If you say sorry in your heart then you are forgiven» need the significant qualification that full forgiveness involves actually hearing Jesus's words «I absolve you», and presence at the Mass..

bootyfunk your and idiot because that passage in mathew 10 its a parrable he is trying to get people to realize that God needs to be the most important thing your life because with him you would not be period so to say that Jesus Christ the son of God is promoting volience is ridiculous, it tares me up that people like you take bit's and peices of the bible and make sound like you want it to if your going to read the Christian hand book then read it all do nt take stuff out of contence just to suit your life style your truly and always be a devoute Christian

If there is a need for new institutional forms and styles, however, this theology doubtless has a great deal to say.

Fourth, the old - style shepherding image shows, if it is rightly set forth, that our culture's movement from an agricultural to an industrial civilization need not render the metaphor irrelevant or meaningless, and that the basic needs that pastoral care tries to meet remain the same from age to age.

Another preacher preaching what ever goes is ok with Christianity... If your going to preach Christianity based on the Bible, then you might as well forget gay marriages are ok... If you want to twist it around then thats up to you... Paul said, «The Berens were of noble charachter because they didn't believe what they heard, but they took what they heard and confirmed it with the Bible... So its like the Yen or Yang... Its either Gods church or Satans Church... Can't be any other way... Do I hate gays, no... I have some very close friends that I have had for over 30 years that are gay, but I think they will be accountable for their life styles... Thats the thing about Christianity, we are held accountable, its not an everything goes belief... Its rules we have to follow... And rules we will be held accountable... So maybe this preacher needs to start a dfferent faith or religion... One where there are no rules and where its people are not accountable for their actions...

If they need the stricter community of Calvary Chapel (Costa Mesa style), it is ok.

Funny I never thought of Jesus as having a hercules style body... Just average build... He did work as a capenter and the carpenters I know have good muscle tone... by are not body builder status, Hercules built to excess... They are just like a average farmer, strong and even in muscle tone... Jesus's whole life was about being humble and coming from the low end of the society... he was born with the animals in a very humble place... I do not see him as a super strong human... but then being the son of God, he would have had super powers if he wanted them... he just did not need them...

bottom line is girls need to wrestle girls think of it like this would you let a girl get in a ring and box against a boy» even if they were wearing amatuer style pads... hell no!

I don't understand why gay people need other people to approve of their life style if you like being gay go be gay fine.

You don't even need a bread pan, if artisan - style loaves are your thing.

If you're planning a deli - style meal or potluck, these gluten - free Vegan Mini Potato Salad Cups need to be on the menu.

If you need to spruce up your recipe library, I'm available to style and photograph the recipes that have already been developed by your company.

If you're looking for a go to Asian style sauce to implement into your cooking routine or simply need to break into the world of buffalo cauliflower wings,

Greeters ask guests if they've been there before, and then let the server know if their style of humor needs to be adapted to a particular situation.

If you want to prepare Matcha in the traditional Japanese style, all you need to do is just add water to it — it's pretty straightforward.

Canned vegetarian refried beans (thinned with a little water if need be), thinly shredded lettuce and sliced tomatoes, and black olives in a wrap; optional, add grated Cheddar - style nondairy cheese and / or salsa.

If you think you need mad baking skills like Martha Stewart to make a bakery - style pie crust, there's no need to worry.

It's a great companion to many Italian - style pasta dishes or simple grain dishes during the cooler months, especially if the meal needs a protein boost.

If you're looking for the right selection of fish to complement your culinary style, we have a great selection to suit your needs.

If you're going to get into Sichuan cuisine — the most fiery and, to my mind, most flavorful of Chinese cooking styles — you are going to need some chili oil.

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

If he can learn to pass more often he wouldn't need to change his style at all because defenders will be too afraid to tackle when he's doing one twos in the penalty area.

if you are going to cut it at barca, you better be excellent in pocession, ball skills in tight space... he did not cut it, problem is we need the same skill set in our style of play, alexis would fit most systems, we rely on ball handling, crisp passing, small spaces, now he is struggling....

What that means is that no matter the records two boxers may hold, you need to know how their particular boxing styles match up before you can make an educated guess not only about who will win, but if it will even be an entertaining bout.

if we do nt watch it, today was excellent win over the moany one and in a different style, so no over attacking when we didn't need it, great stuff.

If you have balls I need you tomorrow to resign, will win the la liga and copa with you or without you, Gtfo I hate you, I always doubted you I've never soported you, y ’ all can check my profile, I knew your style was Gona lead to this but sad part is not this bad, we blew a 4 - 1 lead to Roma, no disrespect to Roma but they ain't no Barca, I guess they are after today, I've been drinking and feeling real bad, because I love this club and I knew we were heading this way, it's so sad, I'll be a Barca fan forever no mater what.

We do need a first team replacement for him I wouldnt mind Max Meyer similar in build and playing style or if want to go for someone under the rader who can do a more effective box to box I would say Leon Goretzka he reminds me of a young is Sergio Busquets..

If we plan to stick with possesion style Wilshere need's to leave, i'm serious, if jack doesen't start worriying more on passing than on selfish runs he will need to look for another team more suited to his wayIf we plan to stick with possesion style Wilshere need's to leave, i'm serious, if jack doesen't start worriying more on passing than on selfish runs he will need to look for another team more suited to his wayif jack doesen't start worriying more on passing than on selfish runs he will need to look for another team more suited to his ways.

for me i am jst so shocked that arsenal have a set style to dominate and when they are dominated by munich or barca (games you expect to be chasing shadows) there is just no plan B — they do nt hold there shape they do nt do anythign urgent if anything solidified my want for wenger to go was Wednesdays performance — another year gone and no progress made also the lack of depth — ozil needs to be dropped but who replaces him??? — we cant replace him so we just keep playing him and hope he comes good again

The sad thing is is that we shall only get a few more years out of Monreal at his highest ability, before age starts to play a part on his style of play, at which point Arsenal will have to consider whether Gibbs (if he's still with us) is ready to retake his position, or if a new player is needed.

While his style of running is what I think the Lions need (patience, lateral mobility), he just looks like Joe Mixon if he wasn't quite as good.

I support you on the fact that Araenal need a player who can make an immediate impact.However, it's also naive to try to create an impression that he's going to fail due to similar playing style and stature of the players you mentioned above.Even Eduardo would have world class and possibly better than Van Persie if not for his leg breaking.It's likely Mbappe is going to succeed and if he gets signed up by another club we'll be chasing him on the future.The same gamble being taken on Mbappe is the same that was taken on Henry.If Henry had failed I don't think Arsenal would've been this great club today.This is a very similar situation to Mbappe.Weneed players now to have an immediate impact but we should not be inclined to think Mbappe would fail if Arsenal should sign him.

The problem is that any new manager will want to make their own signings to fit their own style like Pochettino did at our friends down the road, but I doubt if Kroenke will make the funds available for that, plus other staff will need to be brought in, ideally at board level, to fill the other roles that Wenger does, like a director of football and / or technical director.

playing with g - rod up front is like sticking to fingers up to traditional arsenal play of fast movement one twos and pass and move football this is very unlike wenger to make such a major shift away front his normal trends of style of play big man up front with no pace just isn't the wenger way really he needs to go back to the past really to answer the current problem i have noticed all the other top 4 teams are more wenger they are (wengerites to coin a phrase) than wenger himself playing with a big srtong pacey team like we use to have they all copied wengers blueprint and left him behind somewhere along the line and he altered his and its not been the same since do nt change a winning system of power and pace if it is was working for you mr wenger

They say goals will be distributed from midfielders to strikers, lets say: Alexis scores 20, Walcott 20, OG 20, mid scores around 20, thats 80 goals, and we all know OG wont score 20 plus, Chelsea won with 74 goals, but their defence was so solid that they did nt need more goals, while our style demands goals, if we do nt score in first half, our players are starting to panic, something like against Swansea last year, we were better but they won, to win those type games you need someone to produce something special, OG simply cant do it

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I can't stand welbeck for one reason he's not better than what we have but if you played a front two of welbeck and Sanchez then Cambpell left and Walcott or chaimbo right that would give us a huge counter attacking style with lots of skill and pace, but here is the problem to do this you need big strong DM to win the ball back when we defend and we do t have them, flaming is reckless and getting old, Arteta is good on the Bala but not quick or strong enough, please don't say Diaby as we all know he will be inj soon again, then also what to do with Ozil and Corzola?