Sentences with phrase «sub-publics in any free society»
In a free society people should be allowed to spend their money however wisely or foolishly they decide.
https://www.entrepreneur.com/
Part of living in a free society means being bombarded by messages we don't like.
In a free society it is not your job to enforce your god's law any more than I should enforce my god's law.
You don't deserve to live in a free society.
We live in a free society.
This principle alone is key in a free society.
Do they not have a voice in this free society?
He made their economic dream of getting rich come true while sacrificing the political dream of many to live in a free society.
Writing recently in the Wall Street Journal on campus rape accusations, Peter Berkowitz asks, «Where are the professors... who will insist clearly and in public that due process is a fundamental component of American political institutions and culture... indispensable in a free society to the fair administration of justice?
The question is whether that should be voluntary or forced in a free society.
If you can't stand watching your religion being criticized in a free society by free thinking adults, go live in a church without any access to the public or something.
Nor did the Church fully appreciate the role of the media in a free society, and soon» instead of a subject of inspiration or dialogue partner in the media» the Church became a curious object of marginal interest, occasional scandal, and, sometimes, a whipping boy.
Facing weak and scattered criticism for expressing your beliefs is not persecution, it's part of living in a free society.
In a free society the same is true, but the official doctrine is one of responsible freedom rather than of unquestioning compliance to fixed orders.
So also a university in a free society is devoted in intellectual freedom to the pursuit of the universal, liberating knowledge and wisdom that are objectives of the society; it is on the other hand a teaching institution where men are equipped to direct the affairs of the governmental, legal, cultural, educational and economic institutions of the society.
It's astounding here we live in a free society where faeries can be faeries but a normal person can't be normal or even voice an opinion without being castrated.
Yep, that's how things work in a free society.
In a free society we are obligated to respect other individuals, not organizations.
Unlike many global religions with theocratic institutions or faiths that weave intricately into personhood and national identity, Christian belief and adherence is virtually impossible to assume of anyone in a free society.
He is subject to no external compulsion, assuming that he works in a free society.
Who in a free society will say that conferring privilege is a secular version of grace?
The moment you do that, you no longer are living in a free society.
As a result, he judges Esther as he would judge a free woman in a free society, and he judges Mordecai as he would a free citizen who could protest his government's policies without getting himself and his adopted daughter killed for it.
Similarly a Harvard committee appointed to explore the basis for the reorganization of college teaching was instructed to concentrate on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society.
The time of the Crusades and Inquisitions is over, you can't force people to accept your religion in a free society.
We live in a free society; and if artists are free, they can be prophets in that society.
We are ABLE to give specifically because we allow our self interest to build wealth in a free society of self - interested capitalism.
Sadly, we see many Muslims escaping the restrictions of their theocracies, only to try to instill the same type of restrictions upon themselves in free societies.
Erecting the «wall of separation between church and state,» therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.
There would be no external standards of what is right and wrong, just and unjust, moral and immoral, by which its results could be judged; there would be no guarantee that, even in the absence of outside intervention, globalization would be a benign process; and there would be no assurance that in a free society, left to itself, we could count on an evolution of moral beliefs to generate values which would continue to underpin the market order.19
The consensus that will emerge embraces both practical education and general education, with the goals of the latter characterized as giving the student «the values, attitudes, and skills that will equip him to live rightly and well in a free society.»
We believe, however, that the censorship tactics of the Coalition for Better TV limit options and threaten the free exchange of ideas in a free society.»
Gary Bauer, a conservative Christian leader who opposes the Park51 project, responded that «Anybody in public life, in a free society, has nuts that threaten their lives.»
This view is eloquently stated in the influential Harvard Report of 1945 on General Education in a Free Society.
But in a free society if we have cooperative efforts in government, then your neighbors get to have their say.
But there are also important sub-publics in any free society — differing in background, personality and immediate interests.
In a free society people have to have the freedom to be wrong, Legislating and punishing belief would never work.
You said, «but in a free society there have to limits to what you can force your neighbors to purchase, and one of those things is insurance that sponsors things they find abhorrent.»
«we see [atheists] openly challenging Christians and insulting them on their own blog page» — as if an atheist speaking on a public forum in a free country is unacceptable — as if «challenging a christian,» let alone any view in a free society, is unacceptable — as if a public blog is his
No body is saying outlaw contraception... but in a free society there have to limits to what you can force your neighbors to purchase, and one of those things is insurance that sponsors things they find abhorrent.
Well you are in a free society and can vote out leaders who do not agree with your ideas.
There are important values on each side of the generation gap — values which need to be brought together to help persons achieve a full life in a free society.
«This is a dangerous thing to do in a free society.»
According to John Locke, the only reliable tie of obedience the old folks will have on his kids in a free society is money — especially the uncertain prospect of inheritance.
The famous report of the Harvard Committee, published in 1945 under the title, General Education in a Free Society, (Harvard Committee, General Education in a Free Society [Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1945]-RRB-.
He says very little directly about civic or political virtues, since the real advancements in a free society are made by private citizens rather than public representatives.
We do not see how any man who is accustomed to taking the calculated risks inherent in a free society — and not necessarily with his money — can totally subscribe to it.
And it is your damn right to have them, after all we live in a free society.
The British Humanist Association (BHA) has called the ruling «completely ridiculous», and argued that the ASA is «chilling the free mockery of beliefs which is vital in a free society».
The ASA have shown themselves to be absurdly hypersensitive to the possibility of religious offence and are chilling the free mockery of all beliefs which is vital in a free society.