Such a view might help interpret the «smeared - out» character of atomic and
subatomic events and explain some supraluminal relationships even better than suggestions made here that the)» may result from God's mediation.
There are certainly some features of human subjectivity that can not plausibly be attributed to
subatomic events.
If both human occasions of experience and
subatomic events are best understood as syntheses of prehensions of other events, then their relation to one another is not as puzzling as has been supposed in the modern epoch.
Nevertheless, process thinkers in general propose that anything actual at all —
subatomic events, amoebic experience, human experience — has some capacity for novelty, at no matter how rudimentary, even negligible a level.
There is little or no direct connection between the subjectivity of the molecular or
subatomic events that make up the computer and the value it has for me.
Some think that, indeed, the subjectivity resides only in
the subatomic events of which molecules are ultimately constituted.
As such they would be instances of, rather than exceptions to, the very kind of experiential activity that occurs in all living things and, so process thinkers speculate, in all existents, even
subatomic events.
From Whitehead's point of view, at least, evolutionary thought requires that there be continuity from the simplest
subatomic event to the most complex human experience.
A pair of physicists announced the discovery of
a subatomic event so powerful that the researchers wondered if it was too dangerous to make public.
Not exact matches
The miracle of life is but a low probability
event, so low that we throw up our hands and say well given enough billions of years and billions of random collisions of
subatomic particles anything can happen.
Whitehead's ontological principle implies that everything is an actual entity (in the strictest sense of the word) or combination of actual entities: both mental experiences and
events on the
subatomic level are actual entities.
Also, it seems more reasonable to think of these periodic
events as aggregate
events which are the outcome of coordinated activities of constituent occasions than to think of them as acts of single individuals (although Whitehead does identify
subatomic pulses with single actual occasions).
In PR he identifies
subatomic occasions with
events which are only millionths of a second in duration.
The analysis of the
subatomic entities leads to quanta of energy that are much better described as energy -
events than as substances.
The issue that was posed above was whether the exhaustive analysis of tables into
subatomic entities yields tiny substances with attributes, or instead,
events in relation.
But what about unitary nonhuman
events, for example, those at the
subatomic level?
Either the relation between successive
events in the
subatomic world is analogous to the relations we experience, or we have no way of thinking of them at all.
The implication of the new
subatomic physics was that certainty was replaced by probability, or the notion of tendencies rather than absolutes: «we can never predict an atomic
event with certainty; we can only predict the likelihood of its happening»... This directly contradicts the mechanistic model we explored above, and it implies that a subject such as normal birth needs to be looked at as a whole rather than its parts...»
Energetic
events at the
subatomic level are measured in megaelectronvolts (MeV), and when two bottom quarks fuse, the physicists found, they produce a whopping 138 MeV.
A major criticism of Russell's view of uncertainty as God's tool for shaping the world is that quantum
events usually play out only on the
subatomic level.
Today some of the best minds in physics are fixated on the
event horizon, pondering what would happen to hypothetical astronauts and
subatomic particles upon reaching the precipice of a black hole.
These particles are high - energy neutrinos:
subatomic hints of apocalyptic
events occurring millions of light years away.
Itforms when a massive object implodes and shrinks below a criticalcircumference, called the
event horizon, and then keeps on implodinguntil all that mass is concentrated in a singularity — a point far, farsmaller than a
subatomic particle.
These turbulent
events also send out a burst of solar wind — energetic
subatomic particles — that strikes Earth's magnetic field within 21 hours, creating a geomagnetic storm.
One of the potentially lethal menaces of space travel comes from being bombarded with energized
subatomic particles, expelled from solar flares and
events such as supernovas.
Before crossing the point of no return (the
event horizon), this material generates huge amounts of electromagnetic radiation and, in the case of quasars, blasts out two jets of
subatomic particles that travel in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light.