There will still be reporting requirements to disaggregate data for five
subgroups of students based on race, income, special education, ELLs, and migrant status.
Not exact matches
Schools were assigned an overall rating
based on the pass rate
of the lowest - scoring
subgroup - test combination (e.g., math for whites), giving some schools strong incentives to focus on particular
students and subjects.
The state wants 80 percent
of all
students and
student subgroups to score at a level demonstrating that they are on track for postsecondary readiness by 2024 - 25,
based on state tests; also wants all
students and
student subgroups to graduate at a 90 percent clip by the same year.
The tracker has a seating plan function in place which allows you to analyse your cohort
of students based on their
subgroups and ensure that these are tracked effectively.
Schools must report all results by
subgroup, but if the number
of students in a group won't produce statistically reliable results, the state need not identify the school as not making AYP
based on the
subgroup results.
For example, the idea that the success
of LEAs will be determined
based on: «the number and percentage
of participating
students by
subgroup who have daily access to effective and highly effective teachers» is problematic in the way that it potentially limits the innovative staffing models possible to serve
students if educator is defined as one being co-located with the
student.
Similarly, we urge those states that
base a portion
of their grade on the progress
of low - achieving
students, or other
subgroups, not to overdo it.
In its analysis
of the eleven waiver applications, the Center on Education Policy found that nine state applicants will
base almost all accountability decisions on the achievement
of only two
students groups; i.e., all
students and a «disadvantaged»
student group or «super
subgroup.»
As with schools, that determination must be
based not just on overall
student achievement, but also on the performance
of student subgroups, broken down by categories such as race and ethnicity.
ESSA requires states to «establish a system
of meaningfully differentiating, on an annual
basis, all public schools in the State, which shall be
based on all indicators in the State's accountability system... for all
students and for each
subgroup of students.»
With respect to the research on test -
based accountability, Principal Investigator Jimmy Kim adds: «While we embrace the overall objective
of the federal law — to narrow the achievement gap among different
subgroups of students — NCLB's test -
based accountability policies fail to reward schools for making progress and unfairly punish schools serving large numbers
of low - income and minority
students.
Identification
of, and targeted, evidence -
based intervention and support in, schools in which any
subgroup of students consistently underperforms.
Identification
of, and comprehensive, evidence -
based intervention in, the lowest - performing five percent
of title I schools, all public high schools with a graduation rate below 67 percent, and public schools in which one or more
subgroups of students are performing at a level similar to the performance
of the lowest - performing five percent
of title I schools and have not improved after receiving targeted interventions for a State - determined number
of years; and
While this replaces the statutory approach
of basing all accountability decisions on the separate performance
of numerous
student subgroups, including
students from low - income families, the assessment results for all
of these «disadvantaged»
student subgroups designated in the ESEA statute must be reported each year and must be taken into account in determining performance consequences for public schools.
The ESSA also requires that, if
students fall behind in meeting these standards, States and local educational agencies (LEAs) implement evidence -
based interventions to help them and their schools improve, with a particular focus on the lowest - performing schools, high schools with low graduation rates, and schools in which
subgroups of students are underperforming.
In many waiver states, some
of the primary accountability determinations, such as the selection
of Priority schools, are
based on the performance
of all
students plus
students in a limited number
of demographic
subgroups.
Evaluators also analyzed annual
student achievement data from the criterion -
based Mississippi Curriculum Test for
subgroups of students at each grade in each school in the state.
U.S. Secretary
of Education Arne Duncan today recognized 337 schools as National Blue Ribbon Schools for 2014
based on their overall academic excellence or their progress in closing achievement gaps among
student subgroups.
Instead
of basic workshops about bullying, Villenas says more targeted information about bias -
based bullying, specifically, would help teachers understand the issues faced by particular
subgroups in their schools and how they play out among
students.
Schools and districts receive a score on a scale
of 0 to 100
based on
student reading and math test scores and growth, closing
of achievement gaps between
student subgroups, and various measurements
of postsecondary readiness.
In addition, the bill requires states to develop a plan to address problems in their «achievement gap schools» — the 5 percent
of elementary and middle schools and the 5 percent
of high schools in each state with the largest achievement gaps among
student subgroups, or the lowest
student subgroup performance
based on achievement tests and graduation rates.
Schools and districts receive a score on a scale
of 0 to 100
based on
student reading and math test scores and growth, closing
of achievement gaps between
student subgroups, and various measurements
of post-secondary readiness.
Requested by the Arizona Department
of Education, this Regional Educational Laboratory West (REL West) brief examines reading and math proficiency levels among
subgroups of Arizona public school
students based on:
Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) targets are set
based on percent proficient in each
of language arts and mathematics for each school and
subgroup in annual equal increments toward a goal
of reducing by half the percentage
of students in the all -
students group and in each
subgroup who are not proficient within six years.
The first
of its kind to be granted to districts as opposed to states, the waiver will allow the eight districts to implement a new accountability model called the School Quality Improvement System which is
based on a holistic vision
of student success, a collective moral imperative to prepare all
students for college and career, and an emphasis on eliminating disparities between
subgroups of students.
ESSA maintains a strong focus on accountability and requires all states to have in place systems
of accountability and supports that include annual accountability determinations for all public schools
based on multiple indicators for the school overall and for certain
subgroups of students.
Comparisons were made
based on subject, grade level and
subgroup and showed in 82
of 96 comparisons, the percentage
of charter school
students making learning gains was higher than the percentage
of traditional public school
students making learning gains.
(e) The board shall establish the information needed in an application for the approval
of a charter school; provided that the application shall include, but not be limited to, a description
of: (i) the mission, purpose, innovation and specialized focus
of the proposed charter school; (ii) the innovative methods to be used in the charter school and how they differ from the district or districts from which the charter school is expected to enroll
students; (iii) the organization
of the school by ages
of students or grades to be taught, an estimate
of the total enrollment
of the school and the district or districts from which the school will enroll
students; (iv) the method for admission to the charter school; (v) the educational program, instructional methodology and services to be offered to
students, including research on how the proposed program may improve the academic performance
of the
subgroups listed in the recruitment and retention plan; (vi) the school's capacity to address the particular needs
of limited English - proficient
students, if applicable, to learn English and learn content matter, including the employment
of staff that meets the criteria established by the department; (vii) how the school shall involve parents as partners in the education
of their children; (viii) the school governance and bylaws; (ix) a proposed arrangement or contract with an organization that shall manage or operate the school, including any proposed or agreed upon payments to such organization; (x) the financial plan for the operation
of the school; (xi) the provision
of school facilities and pupil transportation; (xii) the number and qualifications
of teachers and administrators to be employed; (xiii) procedures for evaluation and professional development for teachers and administrators; (xiv) a statement
of equal educational opportunity which shall state that charter schools shall be open to all
students, on a space available
basis, and shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need, proficiency in the English language or academic achievement; (xv) a
student recruitment and retention plan, including deliberate, specific strategies the school will use to ensure the provision
of equal educational opportunity as stated in clause (xiv) and to attract, enroll and retain a
student population that, when compared to
students in similar grades in schools from which the charter school is expected to enroll
students, contains a comparable academic and demographic profile; and (xvi) plans for disseminating successes and innovations
of the charter school to other non-charter public schools.
Calculated
based on whether all
students and each
subgroup are meeting or making progress toward their state - set targets for the percentage
of students achieving at grade level
Percentage
of students making meaningful growth in English language arts and mathematics
based on state assessments, for all
students and for each
subgroup
ESSA requires that states adopt state accountability systems
based on the challenging state academic standards for reading / language arts and math, as well as on ambitious state - designed long - term goals for all
students and separately for each
subgroup of students.
NCLB mandated that states judge schools and districts, and impose punishments,
based on test scores
of the entire school and district and
of subgroups of students: different ethnic groups, English language learners, children living in poverty and
students with disabilities.
Schools are chosen for the award
based on overall academic excellence or progress in closing achievement gaps among
subgroups of students.
The U.S. Department
of Education had proposed that principals, like teachers, be evaluated as «effective» or «highly effective»
based on a year or more
of student academic growth across all
subgroups.
* I DO NOT believe that it is fair to identify a district or school as a «Low Performing School»
based only on a «
students with disabilities»
subgroup that varies by having different disability clusters
of students, at different ages, at different levels
of severity and need, and in schools with different levels
of resources.