Sentences with phrase «subject and object of»

I understand what it means to be the subject and object of bigotry.

Upon becoming a ward of the state, the child is a commodity of the system, one with physical structure and financial value, and is a subject and object of inquiry and investigation.

Indeed, this conversion can repeat the forms of violence it seeks to redress, as it can sustain the distinction between the subject and object of feeling.»

Welcome to the virtual worker of recent fame — and the subject and object of Om Malik's new blog, Web Worker Daily.

An elegant visual pun, the choice to develop a flag into the subject and object of his artwork is also significant.

For over a decade, drawing and its methodology have been both subject and object of Tara Geer's artwork.

Through his use of the material of inscription, the door becomes both subject and object of its own creation.

Schneemann, then, became the consummate auto - didact: subject and object of her process.

But only the transdisciplinary approach could achieve the authentic understanding of all astronomical information and discoveries concerning the Universe; only through a TD methodology the role of the Subject is recuperated and the Subject and the Object of knowledge could be unified in order to understand the deep meaning of existence.

To realise its being and life, and to experience the fullness of human experiencing, the human person must be the subject and object of love, for it is precisely in love that the human person most fully actualizes itself, and thus reaches the fullest realization of its being and life (66).

And this is so, I contend, precisely when, on both constructions, it is taken in its fullest sense — as meaning that God is both the subject and the object of experience, not only reflexively in relation to self, but also nonreflexively in relation to others.

We are a religiously mad culture, furiously searching for the spirit, but each of us is subject and object of the one quest, which must be for the original self, a spark of breath in us that we are convinced preceded Creation.

The subject and object of this Gnosticism is not God as God but God as or of or in the self.

Strictly speaking, ideal compassion was not conceived as a form of love according to the definition of love in this chapter, for in it there was ultimately no distinction of subject and object of love.

He is both the subject and object of our confidence, and as generations of saints who have come before us have testified in word and in deed, he is sufficient.

Only the dualistic form of the modern Western consciousness, which is grounded in an absolute distinction between the subject and the object of consciousness, instills us with the seemingly irrevocable sense that the world or reality stands wholly outside of consciousness itself.

This statement reminds us that God is both the subject and the object of faith.

It is even more dependent than the scientific community on the direct relation of the knowers to theological reality — the God of faith and believing men, the subjects and objects of ultimate love, the commander and the commanded, the forgiver and sinner.

Bridging art and life, Gilbert & George are the subjects and objects of Photo - Piece (1971), an installation of photographs of themselves in nature interspersed with images of a forest.

Not exact matches

The study was conducted by researchers at the University of Sydney and examined three groups of students, who were tasked with completing an «alternate uses» test — a common creativity drill wherein subjects are given an object and asked to come up with as many uses for it as they can.

«Additive manufacturing technology permits production of extraordinarily accurate duplicates of objects that are the subject of IP protections,» said Teresa Rea, acting director of the Patent and Trademark Office, which is part of the Commerce Department.

According to Paul Greenberg, adopt they must for buyers want to be «subjects of an experience» and not an «object of a sale» as Greenberg eloquently states.

One of my favorite comments I heard last year was Paul Greenberg's manifesto that buyers and consumers do not want to be an object of a sale but rather a subject of an experience.

This is because both processes presuppose a duality of subject and object.

In this structure of knowing there is a fundamental split between the subject of knowing and the known object.

He pointed out how, because of the dominant reductionist view of human nature, scientists are increasingly tempted to treat the human individual as «an object to be investigated, measured and experimented upon» rather than as an «irreducible subject».

And from There You Shall Seek by Joseph Soloveitchik Ktav, 230 pages, $ 29.50 Near the end of Courage to Be, Paul Tillich writes: «God as a subject makes me into an object which is nothing more than an object.

Here Lindblom quotes with strong approval Harold Knight, The Hebrew Prophetic Consciousness (London: Lutterworth Press, 1948), p. 96: «Here we have a state of the highest integration, for the attention is wholly focused upon a single object which gradually fills the consciousness until the connexion between the subject and the outside world is broken.»

One can see here the connection between the internal relation between eternal objects, and the fact that from the standpoint of the prehending occasion, its datum, as a logical subject placed within a functional context, is internally related to it.

While Tillich provides a system to overcome the subject - object dilemma of Cartesianism, he denies that Being - itself is actually increased or decreased by events, i.e., it is not in process, and, therefore, does not share in human adventures.5 Camus» position implies that if there is a God, such a God would be tolerable only if God is involved in the struggle of man's existence.

Such an aim is the feeling of a proposition of which the novel occasion is the logical subject and the appropriate eternal object is the predicate.

If so, the initial phase of the subjective aim is also the feeling of a proposition of which the occasion itself is the logical subject and the appropriate eternal object the predicate.

In the New Testament, beginning with Jesus himself, the projection of personal destinies into the future world plainly accentuated the importance of the individual and made souls the objects of solicitude and the subjects of salvation.

Whitehead points out that not all of our sentences are about objects and subjects.

In a proposition, «The definite set of actual entities involved are called the «logical subjects of the proposition»; and the definite set of eternal objects involved are called the «predicates of the proposition.»

The very act of recognition withdraws the subject from the object being observed and analysed.

In contrast to religious understanding of transcendence, Marx asserted that human beings shape the universe and their own destiny, and human being is not any more the object of history but its subject and agent.

God does in fact treat us as subjects — that is as those having their own agency — but many preach a gospel in which we have been reduced to objects forced to live life in according to some divinely mapped - out and pre-ordained «plan», or to be the at the mercy of divine manipulation.

This comparison of an actual entity to the structure of a linguistic proposition can be misleading, however, since the concrete wholeness of a process is the creating subject (which is closer to the simple predicate linguistically) and the subject / whole's parts are objects (the subjects linguistically).

Let us call the two parties A and B. B's property or treasure, B's heritage, B's right, is adjacent, or appears to be adjacent or is declared to be adjacent — adjacency is a phenomenally flexible term, subject to interpretation according to what is deemed to he adjacent by the powerful covetor; B's thing which is B's by rights, by inheritance, becomes in its adjacency an object of passionate desire, an obsessive craving, on the part of a more powerful A.

The actualizing of an actual entity is a subject, and the actualized result of its coming - to - be is an object.

Whereas the dichotomy of subject and object has been challenged by experiments in modern physics, a Cartesian dualism still provides the philosophical background of modern molecular biology and, more recently, sociobiology.

Scandalously to oversimplify his argument, it is, says Heidegger, the history of this nihilistic impulse to reduce being to an object of the intellect, subject to the will, that has brought us at last to the age of technology, for which reality is just so many quanta of power, the world a representation of consciousness, and the earth a mere reserve awaiting exploitation; technological mastery has become our highest ideal, and our only real model of truth.

Given the standard Enlightenment view of the world as composed of human subjects and nonhuman objects, this dualism of humans and commodities seems appropriate.

In the opposite case, negative value or the experience of the ugly represents a clash or incongruity between object and subject.

He wants an eternal object to be «the same for all actual entities» (Process 23), and yet needs each creating subject to have its own subjective form of that object (Process 227, 232, 246), in other words, to create its own, novel «eternal» object.

Looked at that way, the essential content of revelation, or perhaps the very nature of God (whatever is the ultimate «subject matter» or «object» of the inquiry) dictates certain methods and movements of thought which, if followed, denominate the inquiry as «theology.»

Perhaps «rule» or, better, the active participle «ruling» would come nearest to the original, but constant reference to the «ruling of God» would be both clumsy and subject to the facetiousness of reading the genitive as a genitive of object!

A precise statement of what the correspondence or the clash might be is not easy to produce and is not necessary here, since our main purpose in these remarks is merely to emphasize the point that value experiences depend for their character upon the kinds of relationships that exist between subject and object.

The relationship between subject and object is no longer that relationship of knowing postulated by classical idealism, wherein the object always seems the construction of the subject, but a relationship of being in which, paradoxically, the subject is his body, his world, his situation, by a sort of exchange.