Not exact matches
The word doctrine is therefore being used in a way that is flexible enough to accommodate the variety
of biblical teaching on these and other
subjects as well as the factor
of development in some themes as we move from the Old Testament into the New Testament.
A wise interpreter would set this verse aside as too vague and unclear on this particular issue and seek
Biblical truth on this
subject in the clear passages throughout the Bible that
teach that God does not hold children to account for the sins
of their parents!
In essence, tradition means neither theologoumena ecclesiastically imposed nor superstitions ecclesiastically sanctioned (the common Protestant stereotype), but the sum
of attempts down through the ages to expound and apply
biblical teaching on specific
subjects.
If I am asked to identify more precisely what
biblical scholarship and Reformation traditions have
taught us on this
subject, I quote one
of the eminent theologians
of the first part
of this century, who wrote:
My constant purpose was and is to adumbrate on every
subject I handle a genuinely canonical interpretation
of Scripture - a view that in its coherence embraces and expresses the thrust
of all the
biblical passages and units
of thought that bear on my theme - a total, integrated view built out
of biblical material in such a way that, if the writers
of the various books knew what I had made
of what they
taught, they would nod their heads and say that I had got them right.
From Chris, and the community at rethinkinghell.com: Proponents
of the eternal conscious torment view typically hold to the
biblical teaching that the unsaved are likewise resurrected and that both body and soul are
subject to hell.