A person who is
the subject of an adverse action may file a complaint with the Colorado Division of Labor.
Not exact matches
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many
of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood
of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number
of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because
of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was
subject to a heightened risk
of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China,
subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks
of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result
of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Conditions The Scheme is
subject to a number
of conditions including: • Coal & Allied shareholder approvals • no regulatory
action in relation to the Scheme • receipt
of regulatory approvals • Foreign Investment Review Board approval • no material
adverse change occurring • no prescribed occurrences
The Cooper Union requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or
adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a violation or suspected violation
of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is
subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective
action, up to and including termination
of employment in the case
of an employee.
The Cooper Union requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or
adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a violation or suspected violation
of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is
subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective
action, up to and including termination
of employment in the case
of an employee.
If the lawyer has been charged criminally or is
subject to civil liability or disciplinary
action or any other
adverse proceeding in relation to the lawyer's representation
of the client, the lawyer may disclose confidential information to defend herself.
(a) A public employee whose employment is suspended or terminated or who is
subjected to an
adverse personnel
action in violation
of Section 554.002 is entitled to sue for:
It is important to note that under this subsection
of the Act, in order to be eligible for relief, the public employee must have actually been suspended, terminated, or who is
subjected to
adverse personnel
action.
«[T] he weight
of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an
adverse impact on the
subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an
action for intentional infliction
of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel
of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal
of claims for invasion
of privacy and intentional infliction
of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context
of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident
of sexual assault.
When a company contemplates taking
adverse action against an employee or applicant based on information found in a background check, the
subject of the check has a right to a copy
of the report.
The purpose
of providing a pre-
adverse action notice is to allow the applicant or employee a chance to discuss the background report with the employer before becoming
subject to any
adverse action.
In other words, if you are using a report provided by Proforma Screening Solutions or another background screening company and decide not to hire, promote, or retain the individual who was the
subject of the background check, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) stipulates that the
subject of the report be notified in writing that the information in the background check may lead to
adverse action.