Sentences with phrase «subject of scientific»

Growth deficits in children receiving stimulant treatment for ADHD have long been the subject of scientific discussion.

The role of video games (particularly violent ones) in aggression is an ongoing subject of scientific debate.

It wasn't until 100 years ago or so that the first attempts at standardization were made and rendering became a subject of scientific research.

They are a common subject of scientific research because of their sensitivity to environmental changes.

The efficiency of these supplements is still a subject of scientific debate mostly because the problem may not lie in the lack of these ingredients in our diet, but our body's ability to absorb these key nutrients.

This nopal cactus juice drink has not been the subject of scientific or medical studies but ingredients contained in this cactus drink have been studied extensively.

His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy.

The population affinities of the remains have been the subject of scientific and legal controversy.

«Aboriginal Australians have been the subject of scientific mystery,» notes senior author Professor Eske Willerslev, from the Copenhagen - based Centre for GeoGenetics, Cambridge University and the Sanger Institute.

Greenhouse effect and the prospect of global warming is the subject of scientific and political controversy.

As consumers around the world have become increasingly dependent on electronics, the transistor, a semiconductor component central to the operation of these devices, has become a critical subject of scientific research.

Clouds are not just an amazing subject of scientific inquiry but also beautiful to look at.

Many in the general business community have expressed concerns about the erosion of trust, and indeed the topic is the subject of scientific inquiry, because of the connection of trust to competitiveness.

Over the last quarter century, it has been the subject of scientific studies in the areas of pain, digestion, and circulation, and there have been some interesting results.

This is not to say that nothing is known, but simply that caution must be used in talking about a reality which has only recently become the subject of scientific research.

This has been a subject of scientific research, but up to now those who have studied the problem have not reached a clear understanding about the soul.

Every year, over 100 million animals are used as subjects of scientific and medical research, as well as for educational purposes.

Ancient seals, drawings, prints, books, and medieval, music and literary manuscripts will illustrate the place of animals in the creative process — as symbols, teachers of moral lessons, talking characters, companions, and subjects of scientific study and artistic inspiration.

In fact, it was only in the late 1800s that pediatrics, infant care and child psychology actually became subjects of scientific interest.

Not exact matches

One way to ensure you have the requisite medical proof is to research scientific papers on the subject, such as those from the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

In a 2007 review of the scientific literature on the subject, published in Clinical Psychology Review, researchers found that parenting, on average, explained only about 4 percent of the variation in anxiety issues among children,» notes the WSJ article.

According to a new scientific study published in Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, subjects who meditated for about 30 minutes a day for eight weeks had measurable changes in gray - matter density in parts of the brain associated with memory, sense of self, empathy, and stress.

In the two years I've been writing about open - plan offices, I've read dozens of scientific studies on the subject, all of which point out that they're a productivity disaster.

For biotech companies, prior art searching includes not only the search of patent databases, but also the search of scientific literature and conference proceedings for potential public disclosures of the intellectual property (IP) subject matter.

Science Even Mass (missa) as practiced by Catholics has baryonic matter that can be observed and measured but that part where transformation of the matter occurs is not subject to mans scientific capacity to record or measure.

Of course, they wouldn't have a clue what I meant on an experiential level, but they'd be able to find plenty of objective scientific research on the subjecOf course, they wouldn't have a clue what I meant on an experiential level, but they'd be able to find plenty of objective scientific research on the subjecof objective scientific research on the subject.

Fr Holloway makes the same point: «Scientific Positivism has no criterion of intellectual and moral values, because these are not subject to experimental analysis and verification.»

Anyhoo, as I stated at the beginning of this post, it certainly is an interesting subject about which to speculate as the scientific data continues to challenge our traditional understanding on this highly personal as well as socially important subject.

The only highly publicised letter we have from a recent Pope on a scientific subject is Pope John Paul's letter to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in 1996 on the subject of evolution.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

The conviction that this something must be both subject to empirical scientific examination, and workable in the sense of allowing and demanding human effort, was stronger in the last period than in the earlier years, very certainly because of the awesome advances in science, and especially in the arts of war.

You're simply crazy if you think your 2000 year old book of fairy tales holds more evidence than the scientific research done on this subject, research that is within this decade.

Burhoe's point is that if cultural evolution is the subject for discussion, then the religious traditions whose wisdom has survived millennia of selective pressures can be left out of the discussion only at the cost of scientific adequacy and competency.

Even though scientific theories may have folk - theories as their origin and folk - theories may have to serve as reliable guides to a given subject in the absence of a developed scientific theory, when truth is the primary concern and time is no object, folk - theories are usually superseded by their scientific counterparts.

She is a well versed scientist who happens to be Christian, and with a Ph.D., she must have dissertated a serious scientific subject that is to the benefit of all.

Science can only provide explanations on phenomena that can be subject of inquiry under the scientific method, which is a very limited scope of reality.

To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.

It is a sort of miscellaneous collection of material on a great variety of subjects, literary, social, scientific, and religious, for instance one book discusses astrology, another miracles that have occurred, another morality and custom.

These objections are likely to be reinforced in the minds of those who make them by the qualifications which Buber sets for the philosophical anthropologist: that he must be an individual to whom man's existence as man has become questionable, that he must have experienced the tension of solitude, and that he must discover the essence of man not as a scientific observer, removed in so far as possible from the object that he observes, but as a participant who only afterwards gains the distance from his subject matter which will enable him to formulate the insights he has attained.

Scientific method is man's most highly perfected development of the I - It, or subject - object, way of knowing.

There are differences, finally, as to the relation between subject and object: whether the object is known through dialectical or analytical reasoning, scientific method, phenomenological insight into essence, or some form of direct intuition.

There are differences, secondly, as to the nature of the subject, which is variously regarded as pure consciousness, will to life, will to power, the scientific observer, or the intuitive knower.

, suggests that in order to be accepted as valid Buber's anthropology would have to be grounded on empirical psychology and an objective and scientific hierarchy of values, in other words, on pure subject - object epistemology.

How about if we use our schools and the money that they consume to teach academic and scientific subjects, not a bunch of make - believe religious nonsense?

But when the psychologist is most «scientific,» he regards these answers as a part of the behavior of the subject and not as a source of knowledge of some inner, unobservable state.

While well - acquainted with the tradition of philosophical reflection on the soul and its relationship to the body, Fr Selman's knowledge of recent scientific research relevant to his subject appears less impressive and his terminology, and even some of his ideas and arguments, can therefore appear outdated or irrelevant.

The result of this is that the «thinker» occupies an altogether unassailable position, from which he is able to discern and pronounce upon the limits of every other discourse (scientific, metaphysical, religious, cultural, or what have you), without himself being subject to critique from any other quarter.

These remarkably contradictory, and unexplained, claims by one of the very few Australian creation «scientists» who has genuine scientific qualifications, calls into question whether anything said by this group on the subject can be taken seriously.

Thus we hold that creative synthesis, as such, is then not subject to localization, and thus without contradicting the current laws of physics God is free to participate in the creative process across the entire universe, because God's contact with the world is not mediated by scientific abstraction and is therefore not subject to the restrictions of a local, postprojective theory.

Buoyed by a self - confidence that, paradoxically, can only be justified by the theistic premise of man's capacity to transcend nature, these scientists began subjecting man himself to an increasing amount of scientific study.