Sentences with phrase «subjected expert testimony»

I wonder if anyone's subjected expert testimony to the same scrutiny as, for example, the cost - effectiveness of toothpaste?

Not exact matches

Managing Director of Rebalance IRA, Scott Puritz, is a nationally recognized authority on retirement investing and was asked to provide the Senate with expert testimony on the subject.

When a non-expert in an area can convince another non-expert scientist (you) to have doubts against the testimony, credibility, dozens of research papers by of one of the leading experts in the world on a subject, then score one for Team Heartland...

During the testimony, Laurie admitted she was not an expert in the subject matter she was called to testify on, and qualified experts in additional testimony...

Courts regularly rely on scientific expert testimony, involving for example DNA evidence in criminal trials, where judges and juries have no competence in the subject matter.

Under Florida Statute Section 90.702, experts may offer their opinion on any subject in a case that is appropriate for expert testimony, meaning a matter in which the testimony would assist the jury in determining any fact that is relevant to the elements of a claim or defense.

Regular speaker and trainer on subjects related to international commercial arbitration, franchising law, civil procedure, testimony and expert testimony.

Sworn testimony (subject to cross-examination) by a qualified handwriting expert stating so would be evidence of a forged signature.

Later in the process, as the case gets closer to trial, the attorneys for each side are required to disclose the names of their expert witnesses and to indicate the subject matter of their testimony.

As litigators, it's our job to make sure (1) the expert report is accurate and comprehensive to the needed expert testimony that serves the client's litigation needs and (2) that the expert is well prepared to be deposed and then testify on the subject matter of that report.

If, in fact, the expert's testimony is based on a computer simulation, then it may be subject to a Daubert or Frye test.

The judge concluded that the expert's testimony was subject to a Daubert review even though it was «technical» rather than «scientific,» and that, based on such review, the expert's methods were not reliable.

In the past seven years the Supreme Court has changed the fundamental role of trial judges by expanding, in Daubert, the analyses by which trial judges admit or exclude expert testimony and by broadening, in Kumho, the scope of testimony subjected to this kind of review.

To the extent called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination or relied upon by the expert witness in direct examination, statements contained in published treatises, periodicals, or pamphlets on a subject of history, medicine, or other science or art, established a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of the witness or by other expert testimony or by judicial notice.

Initially, the First Circuit focused on the standards of Daubert / Kumho, stating that this type of expert testimony is subject to a Daubert review, that the trial judge has broad latitude in determining the admissibility of an expert, and that the trial judge's decision will only be reversed for an abuse of discretion.

2786 (1993), the Supreme Court abandoned the «general acceptance» test as the sole determinant in admission of scientific expert testimony in favor of a broader examination, which included such factors as whether the opinions have been or can be tested, whether they have been subjected to peer review or published, their rate of error, and their general acceptance in the field.

The difference between community and separate property, or combinations of both, is a frequent subject of dispute in divorce cases requiring detailed and expert tracing testimony.