Whitehead introduces God's consequent nature for a number of reasons, one of them being that this integration of God's conceptual feelings with physical feelings makes propositions and consciousness as
subjective form possible, and this makes it conceivable that God possesses consciousness.
Not exact matches
The integration of this experience is essentially determined by God's all - embracing, permanent
subjective aim (his aim for his ongoing self), which is to realize all
possible forms of definiteness and thus to achieve an absolute intensity of experience (PR 345 / 523).
The only
possible alteration is in the intensity of
subjective form with which it is felt.
This mutual sensitivity of
subjective forms thus makes
possible, indirectly, a reciprocal activity among the «contemporaneous» prehensions.
They are warranted by statements about the inescapable inclusion of the sense of obligation in the
subjective forms of their imaginative feelings of certain
possible modes of behavior.
The sense of obligation is the
subjective form of an imaginative feeling of a proposition of which one's future self is the logical subject and a
possible mode of behavior is the predicate.
First, are there any
possible modes of behavior the
subjective form of the imaginative feeling of which inescapably includes the sense of obligation?
The observations in his REStat paper are artefacts of a specific theory of decision under risk (
Subjective Expected Utility) and (to boot) a specific functional
form for one of the great universe of underlying functions
possible in the SEU framework (logarithmic utility of outcomes, which is unbounded both below and above... a very special case in the universe of
possible utilities of outcomes).