Sentences with word «subjectivist»

Is, then, the reformed subjectivist principle of Whitehead finally identical with the Hegelian principle that subject and object mutually and reciprocally determine each other?

After quoting the passage diagnosing Descartes» difficulties (which uses the term subjectivist bias), Rorty adds:

And Whitehead can summarize his own reformed subjectivist principle as follows: «that apart from the experiences of subjects there is nothing, nothing, nothing, bare nothingness.»

My contention is supported by the explicit diagnosis of the difficulties of Descartes and his followers in which the term subjectivist bias is used:

Take, for example, the charge against Wycliffe that he was an extreme subjectivist who insisted on the authority of a literal sense disjoined from and set above theology.

When Western thought took a decisively subjectivist turn in the seventeenth century, and when that subjectivism eventually gave birth to a principled skepticism about the human capacity to know anything with confidence, the result, which is much with us today, was the emergence of an intellectual culture of radical moral relativism lacking any thick notion of the common good.

He is primarily concerned to argue, not with Judaism, but with views of revelation which he sees as subjectivist and therefore arbitrary.

To some extent this type of subjectivist approach has set Dine apart throughout his career from other artists.

This preserves the purely subjectivist stance in R v Williams (Gladstone)[1987] 3 All ER 411.

I suggest that Whitehead intended to say subjectivist bias in the first statement.

Rather than helping sinners find redemption, subjectivist laxity locks them into their personal suffering.

4Although the term «conceivability» has a more subjectivist shade of meaning, in Hartshorne's usage it seems to mean the same as the term «possibility.»

Indeed, it is precisely in this respect that he diverges from the traditional subjectivist approach: his insistence on a more primitive mode of experience than is generally recognized as the starting point for metaphysical investigation.

The Industrial Revolution — along with its strongly anthropocentric and subjectivist philosophical trends, especially those resulting from the influences of Kant, Hume, and Hegel — led to the emergence of Marxism and positivism.

By approaching the problem from this more critical stance it may be hoped that a less subjectivist, more balanced account of the place of mind and nature in the general scheme of things will result.

It would then read as follows: «The difficulties of all schools of modern philosophy lie in the fact that having accepted the [subjectivist bias], they continue to use philosophical categories derived from another point of view» (PR 253).

This is the famous subjectivist bias which entered into modem philosophy through Descartes....

Though it avoided theological abstraction and academic trivialization, it was lured toward technique, theological vacuousness and an individualistic, subjectivist orientation.

4However, this does not confuse empirical theology with «speculative theology» or speculative philosophy» — a theology or philosophy that may be built around, for example, Whitehead's categoreal scheme, Hegel's absolute scheme, Kant's subjectivist scheme.

Leclerc then goes on to claim that «a similar inconsistency with his [Locke's] dominant subjectivist sensationalism is found in Locke's doctrine that external things have the «power» to produce sensory ideas in us.»

Ultimately Whitehead articulates what he calls the revised subjectivist principle: «that apart from the experiences of subjects there is nothing, nothing, bare nothingness» (PR 167).

Secondly, this psychological - subjectivist understanding of symbolism assumes the primacy of sense perception and the supremacy of clear and distinct ideas.

Deprived of an understanding of reason that transcends science, people are tempted by purely subjectivist attitudes toward their deepest moral and political commitments, leaving them vulnerable to manipulation and cynicism.

In Cardinal Sarah's judgement, the family in the West faces «subjectivist disintegration» through easy divorce, abortion, homosexual unions and euthanasia.

Or did you pick a Marvel movie combox to ask me whether I am an aesthetic realist or an aesthetic subjectivist?

More generally, it stands within the «realist» tradition in affirming the objective reality of the orders of truth and other kinds of excellence, as against nominalists and subjectivists who believe that knowledge is essentially a human construct and values are nothing but human preferences.

From its evolution out of fundamentalism, evangelicalism has been an individualistic, subjectivist, and pietistic project.

This is also the burden of Whitehead's «reformed subjectivist principle»: all togetherness is experiential togetherness, or an abstraction from experiential togetherness.

Once again, this could easily be misunderstood in a subjectivist way.

I don't think that's the same thing as saying that hermeneutics are a subjectivist scrum, though.

The subjectivist principle is that the whole universe Consists of elements disclosed in the analysis of the experiences of subjects.

By the period of Enlightenment, the Western tradition took a subjectivist turn.

It follows that the philosophy of organism entirely accepts the subjectivist bias of modern philosophy.

In the conclusion of his chapter on the subjectivist principle in Process arid Reality.

Now, after having presented his reformed subjectivist principle, Whitehead forthrightly affirms that the final analogy of his philosophy to philosophies of the Hegelian school is not accidental.

The point that brings Whitehead directly to the concerns of the phenomenological method is his affirmation of the «subjectivist principle»: «The philosophy of organism entirely accepts the subjectivist bias of modern philosophy.

Hartshorne has for years accepted something like Whitehead's «reformed subjectivist principle» as the point of departure for philosophical thinking.

This would be to reject rather than to reform Descartes» subjectivist principle.