Secondly, this psychological -
subjectivist understanding of symbolism assumes the primacy of sense perception and the supremacy of clear and distinct ideas.
Not exact matches
I
understand the «reformed
subjectivist principle» as both naturalizing the human / historical and humanizing the natural — or perhaps better, as seeking an ontological system midway between them and able to account for both.
Deprived of an
understanding of reason that transcends science, people are tempted by purely
subjectivist attitudes toward their deepest moral and political commitments, leaving them vulnerable to manipulation and cynicism.
Our
understanding the symbolic process in terms of the bipolar theory of perception avoids the one - sidedness of an exclusively psychological or
subjectivist location of religious symbolism.
Usually symbols are
understood in what may be called a
subjectivist or psychological sense.