The Appellant Dr. James objected to the procedure followed by the
Motion Judge on the basis that the common issue question was devised by the motion judge himself without the benefit of submissions from counsel and after the conclusion of the hearing of the summary judgment m
Motion Judge
on the basis that the common issue question was devised by the
motion judge himself without the benefit of submissions from counsel and after the conclusion of the hearing of the summary judgment m
motion judge himself without the benefit of
submissions from counsel and after the conclusion of the hearing of the
summary judgment motionmotion.