Not exact matches
The High
Court unanimously allowed the appeals, concluding that the «decision in Barbaro does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and a court is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.&r
Court unanimously allowed the appeals, concluding that the «decision in Barbaro does not apply
to civil penalty proceedings and a
court is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.&r
court is not precluded from receiving and,
if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty
submission.»
Supporting Etiaba's
submissions, Onwugbufor said it was not for the
court to choose for Metuh «which witness
to call first, when
to call the witness or
if the defendant himself wants
to give evidence.»
Reacting
to Shehu's
submission, Falana wondered
if the media aide had «suddenly become so power drunk
to the extent that he can conveniently set aside the judgment of the federal high
court?
What
if oral
submissions to court were the exception rather than the rule?
Your newsletter is not a
submission you are presenting
to a
court so don't write it as
if it were.
Article 2 (c) of the 1927 Geneva Convention states: «Even
if the conditions laid down in Article 1 hereof are fulfilled, recognition and enforcement of the award shall be refused
if the
Court is satisfied: -LSB-...](c) That the award does not deal with the differences contemplated by or falling within the terms of the
submission to arbitration or that it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the
submission to arbitration.»
Article V (1)(c) provides that
courts may refuse
to recognize or enforce an award
if it addresses disputes outside of the terms of the «
submission to arbitration».
Before taking new matters into account based on statistics which have not been considered in the judgment under appeal, the adversarial process requires that the
court ensure that the parties are given an opportunity
to deal with the new information by making further
submissions, oral or written, and allowing,
if requested, fresh material in response.
Having the same judge hear both motions encourages both parties
to be credible in their initial temporary hearing
submissions, as they are more likely
to lose credibility with the
court if they must appear before the same judge
to whom they previously provided inaccurate information.
But the
court heard no
submissions from any of the parties on how or
if these factors or prior case law should contribute
to the hard cap.
But the parties were agreed that when counsel for the secretary of state was making
submissions in the Inner House on the appropriate remedy she had conceded that the appellant would be granted indefinite leave
to remain
if the
court were
to decide
to restore the decision of the adjudicator.
If the
Court continues
to find fault with those
submissions, the fault should not be attributed
to individual prosecutors.»
The latter can lead, as reflected in the husband's
submission in this case,
to the contention that,
if one party has made an exceptional contribution, the
court must consider whether the other party has made an equal, matching contribution.»
The
submission that the issues which arise here were matters for the Executive or Legislature under Article 120 of the UAE Constitution because they concerned foreign affairs and questions of public policy (ordre public) or a matter for the UAE Supreme
Court if there was any serious issue / doubt under the Constitution as
to the organ which should determine such questions, falls away once it is seen that waiver of immunity is a question
to be determined by the judiciary as part of the contractual and procedural law of the DIFC.
The ONCA had directed that
if the parties were unable
to agree on the precise amount of support arrears arising from the
court's decision, they could make brief
submissions on the issue
to the
court.
If the
submissions of the appellant were correct, it would not have been necessary for the Supreme
Court of Canada
to have mentioned the constitutional limit of s. 91 (24) in para. 103 quoted above.
As a final comment, notwithstanding the error noted by the
Court of Appeal («In the normal course, someone on the acquisition team would have been assigned responsibility for determining whether financial instruments that gave a lender the right
to veto a change - of - control existed and,
if there were, communicating with the lender
to ascertain its position»)(see para. 22, FN 18), the
Court acknowledged counsel's «excellent» oral and written
submissions on appeal — even stating that the interests of the parties «could not have been better served».
Section 46 (b) of the Arbitration Law provides that the
court may refuse
to recognise and enforce a foreign award,
if any of the following in
submission for recognition and enforcement of foreign award can be proved by the respondent:
In Accentuate Ltd v ASIGRA Inc. [2009] EWHC 2655, however, the High
Court suggested that an arbitration agreement will be considered «null, void and inoperative»
if it purports
to require the
submission of disputes governed by mandatory EU law
to an arbitral tribunal seated in a non-EU state applying non-EU law.
The
Court noted that credibility issues «almost inevitably arise in antagonistic employer - employee relations» and that the power in the statute
to proceed by written
submissions would be «rendered completely meaningless and deprived of Parliament's intended effect»
if oral hearings were required whenever credibility issues arose.
Instead, lawyers for the two men hope Indonesian President Joko Widodo will come under political pressure
to reassess their pleas for mercy
if the
court rules that the constitution requires the president
to properly consider clemency
submissions.
If the parties do not agree
to submit
to adjudication or have missed any deadline for
submission to adjudication, ie 28 days from the end of the tenancy for the DPS scheme, they must then litigate through the county
court.
In my experience,
if a
court wishes
to make a decision on a point not raised by counsel, they will request further
submissions on that subject.
If a party or a party's attorney fails
to participate in good faith in the development and
submission of a proposed discovery plan as required by Rule 16.1 (b)(2) or 16.2, the
court may, after opportunity for hearing, require such party or party's attorney
to pay
to any other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by the failure.
The new policy states that the ICC
Court expects draft arbitration awards
to be submitted
to the
Court within 3 months of the last substantive hearing, or
if later, the filing of the last written
submissions (excluding any
submissions on costs).
Or
if a prosecution was in the SFO's opinion necessary this could be confined
to a limited part of the suspected criminality and there would be potential for a joint
submission on sentence
to the
court.
The
court considered whether the interpretation exception offended the principle underlying the Rule, namely
to encourage parties
to speak freely and
to promote settlement, and accepted TMT's
submissions that: «
if a party
to negotiations knows that, in the event of a dispute about what a settlement contract means, objective facts which emerge during negotiations will be admitted in order
to assist the
court to interpret the agreement in accordance with the parties» true intentions, settlement is likely
to be encouraged not discouraged».
Using a sample case file, the Osgoode Certificate in Provincial Offences
Court Practice drills down on the key stages in a POA file from meeting your client for the first time, conducting the trial, and making
submissions on sentencing,
to understanding
if and how
to appeal a decision.
Learned senior counsel placed reliance on the judgment delivered by the
Court of Appeal in case of Thoday Vs. Thoday (1964) 2 WLR 371 in support of the
submission that a party can be estopped
to relitigate the matter only
if the cause of action or the plea in defense in the second action is precisely the same and has been raised in the previous case and where that has been the subject matter of a full examination and adjudication in the previous case.
If driving privileges are already suspended and a formal application for reinstatement has been submitted
to the
courts, a New Mexico Defensive Driving has
to be completed within 90 days of application
submission.
(3) The independent children's lawyer must,
if satisfied that the adoption of a particular course of action is in the best interests of the child, make a
submission to the
court suggesting the adoption of that course of action.
If they are
to be conducted fairly, a review or inquiry will have
to be conducted with many of the trappings of
Court proceedings, including an adequate opportunity for all parties concerned
to provide material and make
submissions.
The Commission recommends that items 6 and 12 of Schedule 1
to the Bill be amended
to clarify that,
if the
Court is considering appointing a person or body for mediation, who is not the Registrar, a Deputy Registrar, a District Registrar, a Deputy District Registrar of the
Court, or the NNTT, that the
Court must give the claimants an opportunity
to make
submissions to the
Court on the appropriateness of the proposed mediator.
That items 6 and 12 of Schedule 1
to the Bill be amended
to provide that,
if the
Court is considering appointing a person or body for mediation, who is not the Registrar, a Deputy Registrar, a District Registrar, a Deputy District Registrar of the
Court, or the NNTT, that the
Court must give the claimants an opportunity
to make
submissions to the
Court on the appropriateness of the mediator.
(3) The
Court or a Judge must exercise the discretion under section 47B of the Federal
Court of Australia Act 1976
to allow a person
to appear before the
Court or Judge, or make a
submission to the
Court or Judge, by way of video link, audio link or other appropriate means
if the
Court or the Judge is satisfied that:
(3)
If, under subsection (2), a bankruptcy trustee is a party
to proceedings with respect
to the maintenance of a party
to a de facto relationship, then, except with the leave of the
court, the bankrupt party
to the de facto relationship is not entitled
to make a
submission to the
court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation
to the bankrupt party.
(15)
If a bankruptcy trustee is a party
to property settlement proceedings in relation
to the parties
to a de facto relationship, then, except with the leave of the
court, the bankrupt party
to the de facto relationship is not entitled
to make a
submission to the
court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation
to the bankrupt party.
(3)
If a bankruptcy trustee is a party
to proceedings with respect
to the maintenance of a party
to a marriage, then, except with the leave of the
court, the bankrupt party
to the marriage is not entitled
to make a
submission to the
court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation
to the bankrupt party.
(12)
If a bankruptcy trustee is a party
to property settlement proceedings, then, except with the leave of the
court, the bankrupt party
to the marriage is not entitled
to make a
submission to the
court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation
to the bankrupt party.
(6)
If the trustee of a personal insolvency agreement is a party
to proceedings with respect
to the maintenance of a party
to a marriage, then, except with the leave of the
court, the party
to the marriage who is the debtor subject
to the agreement is not entitled
to make a
submission to the
court in connection with any property subject
to the agreement.