Sentences with phrase «submit arguments in the case»

Not exact matches

The plaintiffs emphasized in their Monday brief «the importance that the cases move expeditiously to resolution,» adding that the parties will soon submit a «joint proposed schedule for prompt summary - judgment briefing and oral argument following consolidation.»

After the 2nd Circuit ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the appeal in the Skelos case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments in light of the Silver decision.

At the end of the oral arguments, Fisher asked the plaintiffs to submit further written arguments concerning whether they have standing in the case, and on the «political question» — presumably, whether or not this is a matter to be decided by the courts or political system.

Last week, the petitioners, which also include the Legal Aid Society, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the New York Civil Liberties Union, submitted a motion for preference to the appellate court, asking that arguments in the case be heard by the end of June.

Paul Downes, using persuasive force almost equivalent to that of Mr Gore, has established his case that the views in the film are political by submitting that Mr Gore promotes an apocalyptic vision, which would be used to influence a vast array of political policies, which he illustrates in paragraph 30 of his skeleton argument

You would need to write up your case in court, so it might be more effective to do that and submit your argument to PostNL, in which case they might see the wisdom of your position.

The case was unusual in that the Board and Federal Circuit relied on some of the same prior art that had been submitted to the examiner during the patent's original prosecution, although the examiner had not commented on some of this prior art, and was unaware of the arguments raised by SteadyMed.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinioCases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opiniocases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

The UK offers far more maternity leave than the European law minimum and the charity Working Families, intervening in the case, submitted that the policy arguments for a difference in pay might become less compelling several months after a child is born, a submission which met with the approval of the EAT.

COPOH submits that on the facts of the case on appeal, a s. 7 argument can be made in respect of the «winds» because the «winds» are not «searches» under s. 8.

The Internet Cases blog writes here that in Major v. McAllister, the Missouri court «refused to accept a website end user's argument that she should not be bound by the website terms and conditions that were presented to her in the familiar «browsewrap» format,» i.e., a visible link that read, «By submitting you agree to the Terms of Use.»

I had the strong impression at oral argument that the panel had not understood (or perhaps even read) the briefs we or the government had submitted, and was in any event not particularly interested in the real issues in the case.

[23] When Mr. Chisholm submitted that the Amos test applied to this case, Laskin J.A. rejected this argument, stating, «In my view, the Amos test does not apply, and even if it did, I am dubious whether Chisholm could satisfy it» (para. 18).

First of all, without it being necessary to rule on a potential analogy between the tendering procedure relevant to the present case and the principles that are applicable in public procurement... it should be noted that the applicant's argument concerning that potential analogy is based on the fact that, at the end of the tendering procedure, no bid or no appropriate bid had been submitted.

In this high conflict case, the appellant mother made extensive arguments on appeal, submitting:

The applicant submitted certain sexual harassment cases in argument which involved higher awards of general damages: see for example S.H v. M -LSB-...] Painting, 2009 HRTO 595 (CanLII), 2009 HRTO 595 (CanLII)($ 40,000), and Smith, supra (total of $ 50,000).

When an individual, group or body is given leave to intervene in a case, they usually submit a written argument (called a factum) and are also given permission to make a brief oral submission to members of the court.

This particular case was a short arbitration and closing argument was submitted post hearing in writing.