Pekin v. Murphy held that a lease which clearly shows the parties» intention for one party to accept responsibility for specific damage, the tenant is not a co-insured under the landlord's policy and therefore
subrogation against the tenant may proceed, allowing the landlord's insurance company to make a recovery and keeping rates distributed fairly.
You (and your insurance company) may have trouble recovering through
subrogation against that tenant's policy because you're a party to the policy and not eligible for liability coverage.
Then that insurance company would prosecute a claim based upon
subrogation against the tenant for their negligent use of the property and request reimbursement.
You (and your insurance company) may have trouble recovering through
subrogation against that tenant's policy because you're a party to the policy and not eligible for liability coverage.
Not exact matches
The
tenant doesn't have to pay to defend
against the
subrogation, their policy will generally take care of that as well.