Sentences with phrase «subscales ranged»

The correlations of the items to their respective subscales ranged from moderate to high (r = 0.47 — 0.73).

Internal reliability of subscales ranged from ω = 0.66 (peer problems) to ω = 0.83 (hyperactivity).

In our sample, internal consistency across subscales ranged from.85 to.90.

Internal consistency in our sample across these subscales ranged from.93 to.95.

Internal consistency across subscales ranged from.72 to.80 in our sample.

Inter-correlations among the subscales ranged from 0.390 (checking and hoarding) to 0.705 (Contamination and Just Right).

Scores on each MLQ subscale range from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating higher Presence and Search.

According to the methodological rule we were expecting to find positive statistical significant correlations between the items of each subscale ranging from.10 to.60.

Subscale scores are calculated for depression and anxiety respectively (subscale ranges 0 — 17 each).

Scores on each subscale range from 0 to 11; higher scores denote a more positive environment.

Scores on the depression subscale range from zero to 42, with higher scores reflecting greater severity.

Not exact matches

Note that alphas for separate language, reading, and writing subscales by age ranged from.77 to.92, representing strong internal consistency.

While not indicating actual scores on the SDQ, the authors reported that mean scores were mostly within the normal range, but a higher range of «cases» was found for each of the difficulties subscales.

Peer problem alphas range from 0.39 to 0.59 and the hyperactivity - inattention subscale from 0.66 to 0.80 (Goodman, 2001; Hawes & Dadds, 2001; Mellor, 2004; Widenfelt et al., 2003).

Fifty percent of children (mean score = 15.72) scored in the clinical range and scores on subscales were between 36 percent for hyperactivity to 44 percent for emotional symptoms and conduct problems.

This five - item subscale includes a single - item rating of overall health ranging from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor) and four items assessing youths» ratings of their current health status ranging from 1 (definitely false) to 5 (definitely true); e.g., «I am as healthy as anybody I know»; «I seem to get sick a little easier than other people.»

The ICCs ranged from 0 to 6 for the WMT subscale to 0 to 8 to the VMT subscale.

It is also possible that a high score on the cognitive stimulation subscale is a proxy for a broad range of nurturing parental behaviors that are eventually associated with prosocial behavior, such as positive interactions with peers and teachers.

Correlations between each of the subscales and the total scale ranged from 0.698 (hoarding) to 0.889 (Just Right).

The individual scores of items under each subscale are then summed to obtain subscale scores ranging from 1 to 5.

The scale reliability is good, from the study annoyance, personal annoyance and negative life events three subscales composed of 30 topics, using 4 points score, the theoretical score range of 0 - 90 points, the higher the score that the greater the pressure.

A total difficulties score ranging from 0 to 40 was derived by summing all subscales excluding prosocial behaviours.16 Total difficulties scores are considered to provide an indicator of level of risk for emotional or behavioural problems.

An overall score representing total difficulties was computed by summing the externalizing and internalizing behavior subscales; α coefficients for parent and teacher reports ranged from 0.70 to 0.85.

The score of the subscale is the mean of the items (range 1 — 5).

Internal consistency reliability was satisfactory with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 for all subscales.

Comparative median and range of subscale scores of the Instructional Materials Motivation Scale (IMMS) and each of the simulation based learning (SBL) activities.

The stability of the CERS - M's subscales is satisfactory to good (Pearson's r ranging between 0.39 and 0.63).

The items in each subscale were on a four - point scale ranging from «strongly disagree» (1) to «strongly agree» (4) yielding possible scores from seven to 28, with a higher score indicating a greater level of general anxiety and depression.

For the individual subscales, test - retest and alpha reliabilities range from.45 to.92.

Cross-informant and concurrent validity data were not available for most measures in this category, but most convergent validities for these scales were acceptable (although correlations were low for some of the subscales; range =.08 — .85; median =.57).

Except for active coping (α = 0.51), and restraint coping (α = 0.37), the subscales of the COPE - questionnaire showed satisfactory internal consistency in our sample, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.62 to 0.88.

Cronbach's alpha for all the questionnaire subscales was acceptable and ranged from 0.82 to 0.92.

The subscale scores can range from − 39 to +39, with higher scores reflecting greater emotional approach and greater emotional avoidance.

Patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI; score range, 0 - 63), 19 the trait (score range, 10 - 40) and anger expression (score range, 0 - 72) subscales of the State - Trait Anger Expression Inventory, 20 and the state subscale of the State - Trait Anxiety Inventory (score range, 20 - 80).21 Higher scores on all measures indicate greater symptom severity.

The physical violence subscale consists of six items; thus, the total possible score ranges from 1 to 18.

Each subscale has 8 items, to be administered on a continuous scale ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater adherence to the belief.

The StimQ - Infant consists of 4 subscales, which are summed for a total score (range, 0 - 43).

Steger et al. (2006) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranging between.81 and.86 for Presence and between.84 and.92 for Search subscale.

The consistency coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.90; reliability was highest regarding «affective well - being» and lowest regarding the coping subscales.

According to the results shown in Table 2 and Table 3 most inter-item correlations in the two MLQ subscales were positive and statistically significant (p <.001), ranging from r =.32 to.60 as expected.

According to the results shown in Table 2 and Table 3 all inter item correlations in the two DESMOD subscales were positive and statistically significant at the 0.01 level, ranging from r = 0.19 to 0.6 as expected.

Inspection of the subscales of the FDP (as opposed to the overall family dysfunction score), showed that significant improvements over time were evident across a range of variables, including family pride, vulnerability, emotional distance, tension and anger, and global pathology.

Only between 5 % and 12 % of children are reported by their parents to have behaviour which places them within the abnormal range on any subscale indicating severe difficulties.

Significant positive effects were found for narrowband scores for the Anxious / Depressed Attention Problems subscales; effect sizes ranged between 0.34 and 0.38.

The relative risk of being in the clinical or borderline range of the CBCL subscale scores emotionally reactive, anxious / depressed, sleep problems or attention problems, or of parent's having significant concern regarding the child's development in PEDS were non - significant.45

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES SUMMARY: Studies using the TSC - 40 indicate that it is a relatively reliable measure (subscale alphas typically range from.66 to.77, with alphas for the full scale averaging between.89 and.91).

The internal consistency (polychoric ordinal alpha) of the subscales of the DBD ranged between 0.94 and 0.99.

In the present study, the emotional symptoms and peer problems subscales of the SDQ were combined into an «internalizing» subscale, whereas the conduct and hyperactivity - inattention subscales were joined into an «externalizing» subscale (range from 0 to 20; [21]-RRB-.

A shorter version of the scale using two items per subscale reports less than satisfactory reliability with alphas ranging from 0.33 to 0.56.

Results indicated that patients gave high ratings for therapeutic alliance in e-therapy, with the means for the subscales of bond and partnership between therapist and patient (mean 5.97, SD 1.26) and confident collaboration between therapist and patient (mean 6.19, SD 1.24) within the range of reported means for previous face - to - face therapy studies.