Sentences with phrase «subsequent appeal judgment»

Not exact matches

You know the media fireworks that went round in Akwa Ibom State as at the time of the tribunal and the subsequent judgment at the appeal court was way too confusing to most people.

The decision to refuse those requests was the subject of judicial review and subsequent appeals culminating in a judgment from the House of Lords.

After reviewing the key paragraphs of the Court of Appeal's judgment in Mitchell and a number of subsequent authorities as well as outlining the principal criticisms which had been leveled against that case, the Court of Appeal went on to set out the new guidance.

In view of the fact that the judgment in the said case was not appealed to the Court of Justice, the GC followed this reasoning also in the case T - 186 / 11 Schönberger v Parliament, however, this time, the applicant's petition was declared admissible by the Petitions Committee, but, as Mr. Schönberger alleged, not properly handled in the subsequent steps.

Questioned by SBA about the information in the 2010/2011 edition of JUVE, he acknowledged in a letter in May 2016 that his firm had represented Volkswagen Bank in the competition dispute until a judgment of the Munich Court of Appeal in 2010, with a separate lawyer representing it in subsequent proceedings before the Federal Supreme Court in Germany.

On the subsequent appeal, the Court of Appeal noted that summary judgment for divorce should not be granted where it would result in the other spouse losing benefits such as health insurance coverage prior to the determination of the corollary relief iappeal, the Court of Appeal noted that summary judgment for divorce should not be granted where it would result in the other spouse losing benefits such as health insurance coverage prior to the determination of the corollary relief iAppeal noted that summary judgment for divorce should not be granted where it would result in the other spouse losing benefits such as health insurance coverage prior to the determination of the corollary relief issues.

The precautionary principle has received considerably more local attention since the principle was mentioned (albeit in a non-binding part of the decision) in the Supreme Court of Canada's 2001 judgment in Spraytech v. Hudson and in the subsequent Ontario Court of Appeal decisions in R. v. City of Kingston and in Crop Life v. Toronto.

LeNoury now faced the unenviable task of trying to overturn two subsequent lower judgments written by two respected workhorses: Justice James O'Reilly of the Federal Court of Canada and Justice David Stratas of the Federal Court of Appeal.