These included the misperception that disclosure of major findings may negatively prejudice
subsequent journal publication; limitations in technical capacity to share information; concerns that data would be analysed and published without due recognition; and the possibility that data sharing could lead to the development of products that source populations are unable to afford.
Not exact matches
The
journal's editor, who is likewise friendly to the cause of same - sex marriage, stands by its
publication, and in a
subsequent issue publishes a follow - up article by its author, who cogently defends and restates his findings.
It only gets worse with his
subsequent (2007, 2010, 2014)
publications — all in obscure
journals that have no credible reviewing capability for radiative transfer modeling topics.