Simplified, one could conclude that while the negative decision as regards the petition's admissibility is subject to full
judicial review of the EU judge, any
subsequent decision in regard of a positive petition can not be
challenged before the EU courts, regardless of how the Parliament addresses the petition.
The HRTO moved to dismiss Maula's
subsequent discrimination case given that it appeared to invoke the notion of
judicial immunity and that it was
challenging the decision of an adjudicative process.