They act as the basis for
subsequent legal decisions.
Not exact matches
The facts of the case under review are briefly presented below, followed in
subsequent parts, by an analysis of the
legal bases for the court's
decision.
Such a capacity, which suggests at least partial awareness, distinguishes minimally conscious patients from those in a vegetative state and therefore has implications for
subsequent care and rehabilitation, as well as for
legal and ethical
decision making.
Wolters constructs a largely chronological history since the first half century of the 1954 Brown
decision, and his case studies of desegregation - in - action are drawn from contemporary news coverage and
subsequent historical,
legal, and political science scholarship.
Natasha Bakht and Jordan Palmer point out in a 2015 journal article in the Windsor Review of
Legal and Social Issues, that the Supreme Court's
decisions in R. v. Kapp and Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, and
subsequent jurisprudence, likely make the analysis in Duarte obsolete.
But they have a duty to themselves, participants in their
decision - making processes, and to the public, to speak clearly through their reasons for
decision, and not in whispered affidavits or
legal submissions in
subsequent judicial review proceedings.
The process of pulling dusty
legal books off the shelf in the law library to check a
decision's
subsequent citation history was a tedious, tiresome affair.
In a very general sense, it means that if a court has already decided on a particular
legal issue in one case, the court should follow its
decision on that same issue in
subsequent cases.
Also, there is no
legal obligation to revisit a lawfully made
decision if
subsequent to the
decision being made, the employer becomes aware that the employee is pregnant.
Two
subsequent WSIAT
decisions have confirmed the finding, yet the failure to address required law or policy changes (with the exception of an amendment creating presumptions for first responders with post-traumatic stress disorders) means other workers with chronic mental stress face lengthy
legal battles for entitlement to benefits.
The court relied heavily on the doctrine of stare decises to support its conclusion stating that «common - law
decisions should stand as precedents for guidance in cases arising in the future» and «generally be followed in
subsequent cases presenting the same
legal problem.»
In the
subsequent years, this
decision was cited in numerous others, and written
legal holds became central to an effective eDiscovery preservation process.
The judgment deals with this argument by citing the
decisions in Zaiwalla & Co v Walia [2002] IRLR 697, [2002] All ER (D) 103 (Aug) and Governing Body of St Andrew's Primary School v Blundell [2010] UKEAT / 330/09, [2010] All ER (D) 68 (Oct), in each of which aggravated damages reflected the abusive way in which the employer had defended the
subsequent legal proceedings; from this it was extrapolated that there can be consideration of post-termination conduct generally, provided that it is causally linked to the original discrimination.
Analyzing how a given opinion has been impacted by
subsequent decisions is an essential part of
legal research.
I forgot, the Bureau does not go on fishing expeditions, it only reacts to complaints from outfits / people like, say, previously court ordered /
decision supported - losers of their cases in the first place re admission to and
subsequent rescinding of membership in a trade association... all by the way via court upheld
legal means employed by said trade association (s).