As explained below, two possible uses of school food revenue —
subsidizing paid meals and providing competitive foods — raise concerns that low - income children may not be getting the full benefit of the federal reimbursements intended for those meals.
Not exact matches
Fringe benefits such as a company car,
subsidized meals and insurance can be a great way to
pay for services and decorate a more enticing employee package.
The USDA knew all along that the
Paid Meal Equity provision of the HHFKA would likely drive participation downward, and while the intent is well - meaning (to make sure that reimbursements for low income kids»
meals are not unintentionally
subsidizing lower prices for slightly more affluent
paying students), no one benefits when fewer kids eat the school lunch.
Upgraded nutrition standards — including more helpings of vegetables, more whole grains, fewer French fries and other potato products, and much less salt in food — are expected to cause more
paying kids to reject the federally -
subsidized hot
meal.
Republicans who pushed for the bill argued that the CEP is a waste of taxpayers» money as it
subsidizes the
meals of kids who can afford to
pay for them.
The jolt in demand for government -
subsidized meals comes as many school programs are struggling to balance their food service budgets because of higher costs and a decline in
paying customers, school nutrition advocates said.
They believe CEP unfairly
subsidizes the
meals of kids who could afford to
pay full price, at enormous cost to taxpayers, and have advocated for a 60 - percent threshold to determine a school or district's eligibility.
Third, by eliminating the
paid meal equity provision, the House Republicans» bill does exactly what it falsely accuses CEP of doing — it puts taxpayers on the hook for
subsidizing meals for children from well - off families at the expense of children from lesser means.
As the New York Times article discusses more fully, the impetus for the price increase was a finding by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a research organization in Washington, that by keeping the price of the full
meal too low, the
paid meals were effectively being
subsidized by the federal dollars which are supposed to be allocated to the
meals provided to kids who are on free / reduced lunch.