This is
in the main true, but, as I have pointed out elsewhere, Suarez shifts the emphasis
in his metaphysics of material substances from the phenomenon of
substantial change to the problem of substantial unity, which is precisely the problem that so vexed both Leibniz and Leclerc (For an account of Suarez's metaphysics of material substances, see my article «The Importance of the Concept of Substantial Unity in Suarez's Hylomorphism», in the special Suarez volume of the American Catholic Philosophical
substantial change to the problem of
substantial unity, which is precisely the problem that so vexed both Leibniz and Leclerc (For an account of Suarez's metaphysics of material substances, see my article «The Importance of the Concept of Substantial Unity in Suarez's Hylomorphism», in the special Suarez volume of the American Catholic Philosophical
substantial unity, which is precisely the problem that so vexed both Leibniz and Leclerc (For an account of Suarez's metaphysics of material substances, see my article «The Importance of the Concept of
Substantial Unity in Suarez's Hylomorphism», in the special Suarez volume of the American Catholic Philosophical
Substantial Unity
in Suarez's Hylomorphism»,
in the special Suarez
volume of the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.)
The ocean conveyor system, Rutgers scientists believe,
changed at the same time as a major expansion
in the
volume of the glaciers
in the northern hemisphere as well as a
substantial fall
in sea levels.