Sentences with phrase «substantial disagreement in»

There is substantial disagreement in the terms used to distinguish the different Christian traditions.

Not exact matches

And that's before accounting for some of the factors that the model doesn't consider: the disagreement in the polls, the unusual nature of Trump's candidacy and the demographic changes it is producing, Clinton's superior turnout operation, the possibility of «shy Trump» voters, the fact that the news cycle is still somewhat fluid headed into the final weekend, the declining response rates to polls, and the substantial number of high - profile polling misses around the world over the past few years.

If there is a substantial disagreement between you two regarding whether you should give birth to a new life, then there is no sense in getting married at all.

«He wanted to reduce achievement gaps among children and he wanted to improve achievement overall for Indiana students, but there was substantial disagreement about the mechanisms he used in order to achieve that change.»

As the science blogger James Hrynyshyn put it last year (responding to a similar Wall Street Journal piece), there's little merit in the argument that scientific disagreement (a normal part of the scientific process) undermines the basic findings pointing to substantial risks from unabated emissions of greenhouse gases.

Now, the two of us have very substantial disagreements with these environmental economists and most neoclassical economists, many of which we laid out in our on - line debate hosted by Cato, which included participation from Joe Romm.

Tim Lambert links to this article by Eric Pooley in Slate's The Big Moneye which points out that, for all the disagreement among economists regarding the details of climate change policy, there is substantial consensus on the following main points (i) the cost of action to stabilise atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases will be of the order of 1 per cent of GDP (ii) a strong mitigation policy is preferable to business as usual

Nor do you mention the substantial disagreement between the raters, or the fact that the disagreed upon observations were still included in the results.

My point of disagreement with you (and a couple of previous times) was that saying a province of Canada, or a country like Norway, is «100 % renewable» is not particularly helpful in the context of understanding whether it is possible to reach a high penetration of technosolar (e.g. a consistent > 30 %) without substantial fossil fuel or nuclear backup.