Sentences with phrase «substantial grounds not»

Not exact matches

New York State Supreme Court Judge Bruce Cozzens Jr. of Nassau County ruled that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Commuter Tax was unconstitutional on the grounds that the law is «a special law, which does not serve substantial state interest».

But you can use coffee grounds for most plants as the acid level is not as high as you would think as a substantial amount of the «acid» is cooked out of the coffee and drunk.

When the global EF is decomposed into its six components (Figure 1), none of the five non-carbon land - use categories has any substantial ecological deficit — suggesting that depletion of cropland, grazing land, forest land, fishing grounds, and built - up land is not occurring on an aggregate, global level.

Most importantly, in the NS & ME case (Case C - 411 / 10 and C - 493 / 10), decided in December 2011, the CJEU followed the ratio of MSS, holding that «Dublin» transfers must be suspended where the transferring State can not be unaware of systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the responsible State which give rise to substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker will face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 4 of the Charter.

When deciding if you have substantial grounds for a case, a professional malpractice attorney will look at: the doctor - patient relationship; whether or not the doctor made a mistake in diagnosis, treatment or lack of treatment; the connection between the breach of care and the patient's harm; the extent of harm; and the dates the injury, loss or damage occurred or were discovered.

An employer can not lawfully dismiss an employee unless substantial grounds exist to justify termination, such as the employee's conduct.

There are thus substantial grounds for contending that even so - called hard - core cartels may be regarded by a jury as not satisfying the high threshold needed in order for the conduct to be rightly criminalised.

Whether the conditions for the making of a disclosure order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 existed or did not exist was essentially a question of fact, the question being whether there were «reasonable grounds for believing» that the material relied upon by the Serious Organised Crime Agency was likely to be of substantial value and that it was in the public interest that the material should be produced or that access to it should be given having regard to: (a) the benefit likely to accrue to the civil recovery investigation if the material was obtained; and (b) the circumstances under which the person concerned had any of the material in his possession, power or control (criteria (a) and (b)-RRB-.

This appeal considered whether, when a defendant pleads not guilty to murder on the grounds of diminshed responsibility, the judge must direct the jury as to the meaning of «substantial» for the purposes of the phase «substantially impaired» in the Homicide Act 1957, s 2 (1)(b).

situations involving the removal of a seriously ill person in which substantial grounds have been shown for believing that he or she, although not at imminent risk of dying, would face a real risk, on account of the absence of appropriate treatment in the receiving country or the lack of access to such treatment, of being exposed to a serious, rapid and irreversible decline in his or her state of health resulting in intense suffering or to a significant reduction in life expectancy.

If the parties can not agree, the Crown will let the presiding Judge or Justice of the Peace know that he or she is seeking the detention of the accused person on one of the three grounds in the Criminal Code: i) the primary ground (that the accused will not attend for court and could flee the jurisdiction), ii) the secondary ground (that the accused is a public safety risk and there is a substantial likelihood he or she will reoffend while out on bail), and iii) the tertiary ground (that the public will lose confidence in the administration of justice should the accused person be released).

It is not for the tenant to show that there is a genuine dispute on substantial grounds but to show the appearance of substantial grounds.