Not exact matches
Graham's philosophy of «
value investing» — which shields investors from
substantial error and teaches them to develop long - term strategies — has made The Intelligent Investor the
stock market bible ever since its original publication in 1949.»
If you purchase shares of our common
stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and
substantial dilution of $ in the net tangible book
value per share, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus).
We would happily return to the
stock should it again sell at a
substantial discount to our
value estimate.
We believe that at our purchase price, the
stock traded at a
substantial discount to the company's asset
value net of debt.
We look for
stocks trading at a
substantial discount to our estimate of intrinsic
value.
If a corporation / parent company has a
substantial egregious record or history of working against our
values — organics, sustainability, non-toxic food, social and environmental responsibility, etc., we remove their products from our shelves, or don't
stock them in the first place.
Gifts of
stock or securities may offer a
substantial tax break because you may take the full
value of your gift of securities while you support Kessler Foundation's mission.
We then require the
stocks we add to our portfolio to be trading at a
substantial discount to our estimate of that intrinsic
value.
You should also keep in mind that investing in individual
stocks is extremely risky: If that one
stock does poorly, then the
value of your portfolio can take a
substantial hit.
While growth
stocks are those that are anticipated to generate
substantial capital gains,
value stocks are those that the market sees as underrated or ignored.
Instead, I am trying to disprove, by showing
substantial disconfirming evidence, that ignoring what appears to be an «expensive»
stock is a costly mistake made by
value investors — a mistake, which is underweighted by them because it does not show up in their P&L (as it's an opportunity loss), but hugely affects their long - term net worth...
ABTL's liquidating
value of $ 0.78 is 82 % higher than its
stock price of $ 0.43, which is a
substantial margin for error (or safety).
A large
stock price decline can destroy
substantial amounts of intrinsic
value due to its effects on morale, retention and recruitment, and the perception and reputation of a company.
The same is true for other wealth creation common
stocks acquired during the quarter at
substantial discounts from readily ascertainable net asset
values — including the probable real estate
values in Alexander & Baldwin and Catellus; the probable securities
values in Brascan (including real estate), Phoenix Companies, MONY and Toyota Industries; and the probable
values of Assets Under Management (AUM) for BKF and Legg Mason.
A majority of the TAVF common
stock investments are in companies acquired at
substantial discounts from Fund management's estimates of net asset
value (NAV), where Fund management believes that prospects are good that NAV will be steadily increased over the long term.
The «Tangency Portfolio» noted in the graph is the theoretical point at which you can maximize return without taking on
substantial additional volatility as compared to holding 100 % mid cap
value stocks.
As I understand it, any increase in the
value of the
stock is tax free which COULD be quite
substantial.
Although the rule of thumb is that a company won't go public, and probably can't go public, if a common
stock issue can be priced only at or below private business
value, once a typical, private company does go public, it ordinarily does so at a price which represents not only a
substantial premium over private business
value but, more importantly, also represents a meaningful discount, usually based on comparative analysis spread sheets, from anticipated market prices for the new issue.
While there is
substantial value on the balance sheet relative to the
stock price, the risk is that the company continues to trade and destroys that remaining
value.
The few
stocks that do have a positive net current asset
value are generally trading a
substantial premium to that
value, with the exception of NWD and ZING, which qualify as Graham net nets.
But the reward for patience and discipline can be
substantial because, as we've seen time and time again,
value stocks tend to outperform over long - term, full market cycles.
The ITQ
values are closer but the lower volatility
stocks» ITQ are 50 % better, a
substantial difference along with having a higher «% of Winners.»
In contrast, a majority of the common
stocks held in the TAVF portfolio are issues of companies with ultra-strong balance sheets where the issue was acquired at prices that represent a
substantial discount from readily ascertainable net asset
values; e.g., Toyota Industries, Tejon Ranch, MBIA, Millea Holdings, Forest City Enterprises, Radian Group, St. Joe, and Brascan.
When the opportunities are ripe and the par
value has risen to a comparative degree sell or dispose your
stocks with
substantial profits and buy properties and preferably real estate or lands.
Graham's philosophy of «
value investing» — which teaches investors to buy
stocks for less than the company's intrinsic worth is renown for shielding investors from
substantial error — has made The Intelligent Investor a
stock market bible ever since its original publication in 1949.
If you're the kind of investor who has the patience and discipline to stay with a
stock for the truly
substantial long - term gains... if you're not a get - rich - quick, instant gratification type of person... then
value investing is perfect for you.
My favorite
stocks are those trading at a
substantial discount to net current assets or liquidation
value, with an activist pushing for a catalyst to unlock the
value.
Oddly enough, it's
value investors who often skip this step... maybe because they're too busy drooling over what they see as a free lunch — i.e. an obvious &
substantial share price discount to a
stock's intrinsic
value, something you're far less likely to see up - front with a growth
stock.
However, my reasoning probably isn't so different — the more bullish I get, the more rapidly I expect deep
value stocks to be revalued in the market (or be acquired), and / or special situation catalysts to deliver
substantial value & upside.
Buying more
stocks that then increase in
value results in a greater gain for the investor; however, buying more
stocks that lose
value exposes the investor to much more
substantial losses.
The executive's high tax bracket and
substantial NUA, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of her company
stock's market
value, enabled the NUA rule to produce considerable tax savings.
We have deployed
substantial experience in evaluating small - and mid-cap
stocks with the
value approach.
«While waiting to participate in the
substantial value that the firm can realize over time, investors are nicely compensated with the
stock's 6 % + dividend yield.
There are actually two; 1) the Greek situation will probably stumble along in its current form for a while, creating
substantial volatility in world
stock markets, and 2) given all this negative news there may be some nuggets of gold in the Greek
stock market that are worth a look for adventurous
value investors (the WSJ had a piece on Greek shipping companies today, so I'm not alone with this line of thinking... beware!).
With ZLC trading at a
substantial 33 % discount to its
value in liquidation and Breeden continuing to buy
stock, ZLC seems like a good bet to us.
If I am reading you right, you are saying that
value applies to a
stock (not a company), and that
value investing does not require (earnings) growth to be successful, whereas growth investing is paying a premium, and thus requires sustained,
substantial earnings growth to be successful (because you are paying so much for the shares).
Very occasionally, you'll find a
stock with significant proved up / producing reserves / resources that's priced at a
substantial discount to intrinsic
value.
Of course, we must acknowledge the gap between a company's share price and its intrinsic
value can sometimes be a long & difficult journey... But in terms of a key event / catalyst, this Sunday Times story (from March) is critical: «Tom Roche, the largest shareholder in NTR, has wrested back control of his 38 % stake in the investment firm after a receiver was appointed to the company that holds the
stock... It is understood Roche had been seeking a
substantial discount on the borrowings guaranteed by shares in NTR... Roche, who is the chairman of NTR, won a last - minute reprieve by writing a cheque for the full amount of the loans last Monday».
For example, new building costs in Berlin are estimated to be around EUR 1,200 - 1,400 per sq mtr, while a
substantial % of its existing housing
stock's
valued at (& can be purchased at) about EUR 900 per sqm, or less.
With the
stock trading at a
substantial 30 % premium to that
value and the business continuing to lose ground, I'm taking the money and running.
As originally practiced by
value investors,
stock - picking was something close to a sure thing: you looked for
stocks trading close enough to their asset
value that they provided a
substantial «margin of safety» against loss, and you looked for business fundamentals that offered
substantial upside in the future.
There are some
Value Investors that have identified value in the growth path they expect for Amazon — for instance, London based value investors Mundane Asset Management have held a substantial position in Amazon: recently, more than 20 % of their World Leaders Fund was in Amazon stock (as of October 2
Value Investors that have identified
value in the growth path they expect for Amazon — for instance, London based value investors Mundane Asset Management have held a substantial position in Amazon: recently, more than 20 % of their World Leaders Fund was in Amazon stock (as of October 2
value in the growth path they expect for Amazon — for instance, London based
value investors Mundane Asset Management have held a substantial position in Amazon: recently, more than 20 % of their World Leaders Fund was in Amazon stock (as of October 2
value investors Mundane Asset Management have held a
substantial position in Amazon: recently, more than 20 % of their World Leaders Fund was in Amazon
stock (as of October 2015).