As expected, Huber and Knutti find that greenhouse gases contributed to
substantial warming since 1850, and aerosols had a significant cooling effect:
As expected, Huber and Knutti find that greenhouse gases contributed to
substantial warming since 1850, and aerosols had a significant cooling effect:
Not exact matches
Background on the
Warm Front and the successor scheme:
Since 2000, when the Home Energy Efficiency Scheme was re-branded as
Warm Front, with
substantial additional funding and the introduction of heating measures to supplement insulation works, the scheme has formed a major element in fuel poverty policy.
The response to global
warming of deep convective clouds is also a
substantial source of uncertainty in projections
since current models predict different responses of these clouds.
Since most of the measures required to slow the warming, from greatly increasing energy efficiency to land reform in poor nations, would carry other great benefits, and since the probability of unprecedented change appears to be in the vicinity of 50 percent, a very large social effort, one incurring substantial costs, seems to us not simply justified but virtually manda
Since most of the measures required to slow the
warming, from greatly increasing energy efficiency to land reform in poor nations, would carry other great benefits, and
since the probability of unprecedented change appears to be in the vicinity of 50 percent, a very large social effort, one incurring substantial costs, seems to us not simply justified but virtually manda
since the probability of unprecedented change appears to be in the vicinity of 50 percent, a very large social effort, one incurring
substantial costs, seems to us not simply justified but virtually mandatory.
The study, described in an article today in The Times, finds that poorly understood variations in water vapor concentrations in the stratosphere were probably responsible for a
substantial wedge of the powerful
warming trend in the 1990s and a
substantial portion of «the flattening of global average temperatures
since 2000 ″ (to anyone who hates talk of plateaus and the like, those are the authors» words, not mine).
Paul S (# 1)--
Since the Planck Response dominates over positive feedback responses to temperature, wouldn't a La Nina - like failure of surface temperature to rise lead to an increase rather than a reduction in energy accumulation compared with accumulation during a surface
warming — presumably a small increase, so that the observed rise in ocean heat content would still be
substantial?
You provide no evidence of some
substantial increase in volcanic and / or earthquake activity in the global
warming period
since 1900, or the more recent global
warming period of
since 1970.
It is likely that there has been an anthropogenic contribution to the very
substantial Arctic
warming since the mid-20th century.
Delegates agreed to include new text on multiple lines of evidence supporting very
substantial Arctic
warming since the mid-20th century.
They seem unaware of the
substantial warming from 1920 to 1950 nor of the
warming around 1818 to 1860, nor that of the first few decades of the 18th century nor of the first half of the 16th century when the northern sea route probably became navigable for the first time
since....
«Combining the evidence from ocean
warming and mass loss of glaciers we conclude that it is very likely that there is a
substantial contribution from anthropogenic forcing to the global mean sea level rise
since the 1970s.»
As a layman, I can not understand how the «no
warming since insert year here» can coexist with the fact that we have just completed the hottest decade on record, containing a
substantial number of the hottest years on record.
Meanwhile, more than half of all industrial carbon emissions have occurred
since 1988 - and the world remains on a trajectory for
substantial and dangerous global
warming.
If the recent internal cooling was
substantial, this assumption is almost certainly incorrect
since energy budget considerations limit the earlier internal
warming contribution to no more than 0.1 C and probably less.
The increases are
substantial since about 1970, and are likely
substantial since the 1950s and 60s, in association with
warming Atlantic sea surface temperatures.
The combined anthropogenic RF is estimated to be +1.6 -LSB--- 1.0, +0.8][2] W m — 2, indicating that,
since 1750, it is extremely likely [3] that humans have exerted a
substantial warming influence on climate.
CO2 has increased 40 %
since industrial revolution, climate has
warmed 0.8 °C
since 1900 (most of which has occurred recently),
substantial warming in store if GHG emissions continue unabated.
The proxy evidence shows an oscillation — including
substantial cooling between the 1940s and 1970s — and no net
warming since the early 1940s.
They argue that this «very likely made
substantial contributions to the flattening of the global
warming trend
since about 2000» and that temperatures between 2000 - 2009 would have
warmed about 25 percent had stratospheric water vapor remained constant.
That range covers
substantial warming, eg 0.18 C / decade
warming since 2000.
Since the tropical West Pacific is already
warmer on average than the East, this trend led to a
substantial increase in the west - to - east temperature differential across the Pacific Ocean basin over a 15 year period.
Since the tropical Pacific Ocean has a profound influence upon global climate, this relative
warming of the West Pacific had
substantial atmospheric effects around the world.
If greenhouse
warming causes a
substantial increase in hurricane activity, then the century scale increase in global and tropical Atlantic SSTs
since the late 1800s should have been accompanied by a long - term rising trend in measures of Atlantic hurricanes activity.
If greenhouse
warming causes a
substantial increase in Atlantic hurricane activity, then the century scale increase in tropical Atlantic SSTs
since the late 1800s should have produced a long - term rise in measures of Atlantic hurricanes activity, similar to that seen for global temperature, for example.
In comparing human - caused and natural «radiative forcing,» (which is defined as «an index of the importance of [a] factor as a potential climate change mechanism»), the IPCC's February 2007 Working Group I Report «The Physical Science Basis» concluded that
since 1750, «it is extremely likely [> 95 % probability] that humans have exerted a
substantial warming influence on climate.
This can be a critical issue,
since the northern high - latitude regions not only include very important ecosystems, but they could also face a
substantial increase of human population in a changing world with a
warming climate.