If you are reasonably healthy there isn't any reason that you can't have
substantially more life insurance using a universal life policy with a no lapse guarantee, for less money.
Not exact matches
Cash value
life insurance also includes a death benefit that is initially
substantially more than the cash value in the policy.
Life insurance for elderly people costs
substantially more as they are at a greater risk of dying during the term.
Whole
life insurance tends to cost
substantially more than term
life insurance.
At that age,
life insurance becomes
substantially more expensive and options are extremely limited (assuming you can even still qualify).
With convenience typically comes cost, and no exam
life insurance used to be
substantially more expensive than traditional term
life insurance that required an exam.
Whole
life insurance is not necessarily bad but it may not be right for you as it can be
substantially more expensive than a term
insurance.
Permanent
life insurance usually costs
substantially more than term
life insurance, depending on your age and health factors.
Since you're not receiving tailored rates dependent on your particular health status, both final expense and guaranteed issue
life insurance are
substantially more expensive than term
insurance and offer less coverage.
When I say collapses what I mean is that they no longer have
insurance unless they agree to pay
substantially more than what they were led to believe would be their level premium for
life.
A whole
life policy does cost
substantially more than what you would pay for a term
life insurance policy.