[28] In Addison, this court interpreted
the substantially similar language of s. 13 (2) of the predecessor Act:
Highlight the quotation, select Find Similar Language, and EVA will find other cases that have the exact quote and others that have
substantially similar language.
Not exact matches
This means that, while policies generally cover
similar perils and
similar types of losses, the
language surrounding that coverage may be
substantially different from what you expect.
Without any doubt, a portion of the Wegman discussion on Tree Rings contains
language that is «
substantially similar» to Bradley 1999, but the majority of the subsection is expressed in Wegman's paraphrase and includes specific points of disagreement (indeed, DC takes particular umbrage at such disagreement.)