Factors giving rise to claims can range from simple administrative mistakes, such as missing key time limits, to
substantive errors in legal advice.
The reason why I've asked climate scientists for source code is because they all too often do not describe their methods accurately and the inaccurate descriptions sometimes conceal
substantive errors in methodology.
Not exact matches
In a budget in which a billion dollars is a rounding error, killing a program that costs a few million a year may be worse than useless, since it lets activists FEEL like something substantive has been accomplished when nothing has, other than to deprive the people who received benefits under the program in questio
In a budget
in which a billion dollars is a rounding error, killing a program that costs a few million a year may be worse than useless, since it lets activists FEEL like something substantive has been accomplished when nothing has, other than to deprive the people who received benefits under the program in questio
in which a billion dollars is a rounding
error, killing a program that costs a few million a year may be worse than useless, since it lets activists FEEL like something
substantive has been accomplished when nothing has, other than to deprive the people who received benefits under the program
in questio
in question.
Errors in self - published versus traditionally published books Typically, there are more editorial eyes on a manuscript published by a publishing house than on a self - published manuscript, simply because an indie author usually doesn't have the financial resources to hire a developmental editor,
substantive editor, line editor, copy editor, and proofreader.
In addition to marking it up, a good
substantive or developmental editor will make lots of queries (questions for the author) on the manuscript, where a copy editor will mostly clean up the language as - is, and a proofreader is usually purely focused on correcting any
errors of usage or formatting.
Look no futher than Manns own page where he has posted up
substantive corrections (based on
errors McIntyre pointed out) without A. crediting steve B. issuing a correction
in the literature.
In addition, as nine state attorneys general argue in their June 25, 2014 amicus brief, the Senate's conforming amendment is «clearly» a drafting error «because it sought to make a clerical correction to Section 111 (d) rendered unnecessary by a superseding substantive amendment.&raqu
In addition, as nine state attorneys general argue
in their June 25, 2014 amicus brief, the Senate's conforming amendment is «clearly» a drafting error «because it sought to make a clerical correction to Section 111 (d) rendered unnecessary by a superseding substantive amendment.&raqu
in their June 25, 2014 amicus brief, the Senate's conforming amendment is «clearly» a drafting
error «because it sought to make a clerical correction to Section 111 (d) rendered unnecessary by a superseding
substantive amendment.»
Even worse, that review contains numerous
substantive errors, some of which appear to have been introduced by a failure to consult cited sources directly, notably
in a discussion of a key quote from Edward Wegman himself.
I am happy that you have confirmed the «1994»
errors I found
in your two papers, and I am also happy that they are typographical, rather than
substantive.
To do this effectively, the researcher must have the
substantive, foundational knowledge discussed
in the preceding sections.111 And, admittedly, if a student has had less instruction on where to click, then the task of locating information may take a bit of trial and
error.
The classic case is that of Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission
in which the House of Lords made it plain that
errors of process and
substantive errors that failed to match administrative law standards were reviewable notwithstanding a privative clause
in the statute that conferred the decision - making power under challenge.
At the Court of Appeal, UBC alleged that the Tribunal had made several
errors of fact and law, including
in refusing to consider modifications of the residency program as relevant to finding that disability was a factor
in Dr. Kelly's adverse treatment and
in considering both the procedural and
substantive elements of the duty to accommodate.
From the claims LAWPRO has seen, it is clear «dabblers» (lawyers acting outside of their usual practice area) are more likely to commit malpractice
errors, and
in particular a failure to know or apply
substantive law.
Green J. reviewed the caselaw on the issue, and concluded that
in that case, where the intention of the judge was to impose two years (24 months) and not twenty - five months incarceration, and where the
error, although not clerical or administrative
in nature was «an
error, a slip of the tongue or clerical change rather than a
substantive change,» he concluded he still had jurisdiction to make the necessary amendment to the sentence.
The prevalence of shorter, simpler emails is also consistent with my recent legal experience as a litigation associate
in a large law firm before starting to teach legal writing full - time — an experience I have drawn on
in trying to design realistic assignments.59 The emails I wrote often dealt with relatively straightforward
substantive matters, procedural questions surrounding litigation, or some combination of the two, such as the steps for having an appellate court relinquish jurisdiction to correct a scrivener's
error in a lower - court judgment or the timeline for responding to an
in rem civil forfeiture action.
Most recently,
in R v Oakes, 2016 ABCA 90, the case that is my topic here, the majority ruling of Justices Myra Bielby and Frederica Schutz, at para. 11, adopted the opinion
in R v Truscott (2007), 225 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont CA) where a unanimous five member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal stated, at para. 110, that the power to overturn a conviction founded
in a miscarriage of justice, ``... can reach virtually any kind of
error that renders the trial unfair
in a procedural or
substantive way.»
Students
in the midst of law school, with its mountain of reading on cases and
substantive law, might be surprised to learn that «
errors of law» are not the biggest pitfall to watch out for
in the world of private practice.