Sentences with phrase «substantive ruling on the matter»

Neither FundersClub nor AngelList rely on initiatives mentioned under Title III of the JOBS Act, so it's wrong to think that SEC was making a substantive ruling on the matter with these letters.

Not exact matches

«That this House notes the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Hirst v the United Kingdom in which it held that there had been no substantive debate by members of the legislature on the continued justification for maintaining a general restriction on the right of prisoners to vote; acknowledges the treaty obligations of the UK; is of the opinion that legislative decisions of this nature should be a matter for democratically - elected lawmakers; and supports the current situation in which no prisoner is able to vote except those imprisoned for contempt, default or on remand.»

Judge Cote ruled this week (PDF) that the brief they already submitted — which «contains five pages of substantive arguments that do not address the question of whether leave to file amici curiae responses is appropriate, but rather oppose approval of the proposed Final Judgment» — will suffice as B&N and the ABA's only comment on the matter, and «no additional filings from the ABA and Barnes & Noble shall be permitted.»

With all agreements at the OCDE level, it will be possible to eventually harmonise tax regulations from a global perspective to solve the needs and concerns of international tax and cross border tax, which will bring positive results, benefiting taxpayers fairly, such as avoiding double taxation, being able to access greater knowledge, exchange of experiences among tax administrations with the consequent achievement of strengthening the actors that implement and execute the application of substantive rules on tax matters; to acquire and strengthen an application of the norm in a standardised, equitable, compatible and fair manner.

I am going to leave the substantive discrimination aspects of this decision to others (my colleague Jennifer Koshan posted on Justice Peter Michalyshyn's earlier decision at the Court of Queen's Bench ruling in this matter — Bish v Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2013 ABQB 756), and instead focus only on what the Court of Appeal has to say about standard of review in administrative law.

The ECJ was satisfied with declaring that, although the rules on limitation periods are treated as a matter of substantive criminal law in Italy, requiring domestic courts to disapply these provisions does not violate Article 49 of the Charter.