Not exact matches
The Niskayuna Central School
District believes that participation
in athletics contributes to a well - rounded education, supports students» classroom success,
gives them skills and experiences that help them
succeed in school and beyond.
One can even say that it is underlying disdain for the very kids
in his
district that is a critical reason why he is such an abject failure as a school leader: If you don't care for kids, you can not do the hard work of transforming the quality of instruction, curricula and leadership that is needed to
give kids cultures of genius
in which to
succeed.
In a district like mine, with high poverty and minority representation in the schools and terrible academic outcomes, it is an unfortunate given among those middle class people who have succeeded in school (or think they have) that the only reason that the district has such lousy test scores and graduation rates is «the parents.&raqu
In a
district like mine, with high poverty and minority representation
in the schools and terrible academic outcomes, it is an unfortunate given among those middle class people who have succeeded in school (or think they have) that the only reason that the district has such lousy test scores and graduation rates is «the parents.&raqu
in the schools and terrible academic outcomes, it is an unfortunate
given among those middle class people who have
succeeded in school (or think they have) that the only reason that the district has such lousy test scores and graduation rates is «the parents.&raqu
in school (or think they have) that the only reason that the
district has such lousy test scores and graduation rates is «the parents.»
Then again, a school
in Hartford, now judged as «failing,» might be
succeeding RELATIVELY, as students might be doing better than expected
given the criminal underfunding of their
district.
Let's
give the students of the nation's second - largest school
district the tools to not only graduate high school but be prepared to
succeed in college and life.
Here is the connection: The federal Every Student
Succeeds Act (ESSA), which was signed into law last December, includes provisions that
give states much greater latitude
in using evidence for improvement — and it allows schools and
districts to more deeply explore evidence - based approaches that are best suited to local needs and improvement plans.
Passed
in 2015, the Every Student
Succeeds Act, or ESSA,
gives states the responsibility to ensure schools and
districts meet the new guidelines and demonstrate accountability with funds used
in association with the new law.
In short, if you want to
give your
district's most vulnerable students the best chance to
succeed — YOU NEED SUMMER.
Ms. Downey and opponents of
giving students additional opportunities to escape the monopoly known as
district - run schools should attend the April 22 screening
in Brookhaven of the documentary, «Most Likely to
Succeed.»
Similarly, Cecil et al. found that defendants moving for summary judgment were awarded summary judgment
in full 64 % of the time, whereas plaintiffs moving for summary judgment were awarded summary judgment in full only 39 % of the time.90 In a subsequent study of all federal district court summary judgment activity in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in full 64 % of the time, whereas plaintiffs moving for summary judgment were awarded summary judgment
in full only 39 % of the time.90 In a subsequent study of all federal district court summary judgment activity in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in full only 39 % of the time.90
In a subsequent study of all federal district court summary judgment activity in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
In a subsequent study of all federal
district court summary judgment activity
in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties
succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties
in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in federal court
in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates
in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in our sample were higher than success rates
in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sampl
in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected
given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sample.