Sentences with phrase «successful appellant»
A "successful appellant" refers to a person who has won their case on appeal, meaning they have convinced a higher court to overturn the decision of a lower court. Full definition
Douglas has had successes in the Court of appeal including Matthews v Metal Improvement Company, Vicar of Spalding v Chubb Fire and was the only successful appellant in the Timmins v Gormley group of judicial bias cases.
dacbeachcroft.com
Vernon Flynn QC of Essex Court Chambers, was instructed by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson (London) LLP and Harneys (BVI) for the successful Appellant.
M&C Energy Group Ltd v St Cuthberts Mill Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 935: Acting for the successful appellant in the Court of Appeal.
P. James Zibarras and Justin W. Anisman of Brauti Thorning Zibarras LLP were counsel for the successful appellants.
Among them, he represented the successful appellant Harish Bhasin, in Bhasin v. Hrynew, in which the Supreme Court of Canada for the first time recognized a legal duty to act honestly and in good faith in their contractual obligations.
According to Daniel Lublin of Whitten & Lublin in Toronto, lead counsel for the successful appellant - employee in Wood, «Oudin was overruled without expressly overruling it as the Court of Appeal here made it clear that «intentions are irrelevant»; it's the language that counts, and this is basically the antithesis to Oudin.»
Represented the successful appellant in the appeal of the original plan of reorganization of the bankruptcy case of DBSD North America, Inc..
Rose v. Lynx Express Limited Ref: [2004] 1 BCLC 455 (Court of Appeal) Acted for the successful appellant on an appeal concerning the appropriate test for a Court to order pre-action disclosure.
BWE International Ltd v. Jones Ref: [2004] 1 BCLC 406 (Court of Appeal) Acted for the successful appellant on an appeal concerning the proper construction of pre-emption articles.
Crawford Adjusters v Sagicor General Insurance (Cayman) Limited [2013] UKPC 17: Isaac Jacob and Conn MacEvilly of 9 Stone Buildings represented the successful Appellant before the Privy Council in a ground - breaking decision which sweeps away centuries - old restrictions on the availability of the tort of civil malicious prosecuti
Close v Wilson [2011] EWCA Civ 5 (gambling, wagering, restitution, void contract, agency)- Rory Brown acted pro bono for the successful appellant.
Crawford Adjusters v Sagicor General Insurance (Cayman) Limited [2013] UKPC 17: Isaac Jacob and Conn MacEvilly of 9 Stone Buildings represented the successful Appellant before the Privy Council in a ground - breaking decision which sweeps away centuries - old restrictions on the availability of the tort of civil malicious prosecution in English law and the recoverability of damages for the loss caused thereby.
Toby Landau QC and James Willan represented the successful appellant, NNPC, instructed by a team led by Kamal Shah at Stephenson Harwood LLP.
Joseph Curl represented the successful appellant lender.
Isaac Jacob and Conn MacEvilly appeared for the successful Appellant before the Privy Council in Prime Sight Limited v Edgar Lavarello (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Benjamin Marrache)[2013] UKPC 22, an important decision on estoppel by convention.
Vivian Chapman QC and Edward Hewitt represented the successful appellants in this appeal against the finding of two prescriptive rights of way over their land and the calculation of damages for trespass.
Notable cases include acting for former Dresdner Kleinwort bankers, who succeeded in obtaining bonuses promised by Dresdner Kleinwort to its investment bankers prior to its takeover by Commerzbank in 2008, and Tillman v Egon Zehnner Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1054 in which Daniel Oudkerk QC was instructed by the successful appellant in litigation concerning the enforceability of a non-competition clause.
In this Lawyers Weekly article, Eugene, who acted as counsel for the successful appellant states, «The Supreme Court's holding that the trial court's interpretation of standard form contracts are reversible if they are incorrect is important for the construction and insurance industries, but its impact goes much further than that.»
The general expectation in the EAT is that the successful Appellant should be awarded their costs limited by Rule 34A (2A).
The normal rule that the Respondent pays the successful Appellant's issue and hearing fees in the EAT holds true even when the fees were actually paid by a third party
He was refused permission by the commissioner on the ground that he had been a successful appellant.
The issues arose as to (i) whether or not the court could or should hear the secretary of state's appeals, in view of the fact that he was the successful appellant before the commissioner; and (ii) whether a social security commissioner had jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal from an LQPM who had refused to extend time or had struck out a proposed appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The Court of Appeal is not necessarily precluded from hearing appeals by the secretary of state for work and pensions on jurisdictional points against a decision of a social security commissioner, notwithstanding the fact that he was the successful appellant before the commissioner; a social security commissioner does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a legally qualified panel member who has refused to extend time or who has struck out a proposed appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Roger ter Haar QC, who acted for the successful appellant Mr Jones against Dr Kaney, said: «Often things go drastically wrong during expert meetings and you can't undo the damage done by cross-examining on the decision making process.»