Generally, if you are
successful in a Court action you will be entitled to recover your judicial expenses from the other side.
Not exact matches
«The DOL has created a new private right of
action,» said Fleckner, who led Goodwin's
successful defense of an excessive fee claim against John Hancock
in the 3rd Circuit
Court of Appeals
in 2014, and was a signatory to an amicus brief filed with the Supreme
Court on behalf of the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association
in Tibble v. Edison.
Unions have challenged parent choice
in the
courts, including a lawsuit against vouchers
in Florida, a
successful action against charter schools
in Washington, and a new civil rights lawsuit against charter schools.
Here, the
action takes place
in family
court, where a
successful judge faces personal challenges as well as a complicated case that pits faith against medicine.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in the
successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a
court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed
in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of Registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in the
successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in connection with the securities being registered, Registrant will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a
court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed
in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issu
in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Polar bear
in the dock - The polar bear was put on the official endangered species list by the US government back
in 2008, after a previous
successful court action.
Assisting with Davies v Davies [2014] EWCA Civ 568, a proprietory estoppel claim over a farm, livestock and business worth
in excess of # 4million,
in relation to
successful initial High
Court action and defence
in the
Court of Appeal.
Alternatively, if the matter proceeds
in the Supreme
Court, it is open to the defendant to ask that a
successful plaintiff be denied costs on the basis that there was not sufficient reason to bring the
action in the Supreme
Court in the first instance.
Condominium Plan 9320022 v. Acta General Inc., 2009 ABQB 623, [2010] AWLD 130 I represented the plaintiffs of a related
action in this
successful application which sought approval from the Alberta
Court of Queen's Bench for settlement between some of the parties
in the form of a Pierringer agreement.
The claim makes a point
in para. 12 of noting that Tasini was also the lead plaintiff
in the class -
action, New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001), which was
successful at the Supreme
Court of the United States
in finding that the New York Times could not license freelance journalist work
in back issues of electronic databases.
After the conclusion of a civil trial
in Hong Kong, an unsuccessful party to an
action will usually be ordered by the
court to pay the majority of the legal costs incurred by the
successful party.
Successful defense of over $ 40 million
in claims for breach of an alleged partnership agreement, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty against a large Southern California homebuilder
in a multi-state litigation, including a six week jury trial, two state
court appeals, a Ninth Circuit appeal, an Idaho state court action and appeal to the Idaho Supreme C
court appeals, a Ninth Circuit appeal, an Idaho state
court action and appeal to the Idaho Supreme C
court action and appeal to the Idaho Supreme
CourtCourt.
The second legal proceeding asks the Quebec Superior
Court for certification as a class
action for the purpose of seeking reimbursement of government processing fees
in the event that the first legal proceedings is not
successful.
Notable mandates: Defence of class
actions in the health - care sector; acted for the government of the Northwest Territories
in its
successful defence at the Supreme
Court of Canada of a fatality claim arising from the death of nine miners; represented a large number of former residential schools victims
in their claims; acted for the vendor
in a transaction involving the sale of 120 rehabilitation and physiotherapy clinics across Canada
Examples include serving as lead defense counsel on the
successful appeal to the Louisiana Supreme
Court of a decision certifying a toxic tort class
action in Alexander v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 82 So.3 d 1234 (La. 2012).
Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of
successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company
in a trademark and trade dress
action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate
court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.
Research and briefing associate on a
successful appeal
in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that affirmed judgment
in favor of corporate timberland owner
in an
action involving claims of trespass by the landowner and claims of adverse possession made against that owner.
Research and briefing associate on a
successful appeal
in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that reversed a dismissal by the trial court in an action seeking to enjoin state court proceedings pursuant to the Anti-Injunction
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that reversed a dismissal by the trial
court in an action seeking to enjoin state court proceedings pursuant to the Anti-Injunction
court in an
action seeking to enjoin state
court proceedings pursuant to the Anti-Injunction
court proceedings pursuant to the Anti-Injunction Act.
Platt v. Platt Ref: [1999] 2 BCLC 745 (first instance); [2001] 1 BCLC 698 (
Court of Appeal) Acted at first instance and on appeal for the
successful former shareholders
in an
action against a director who purchased their shares on the basis of misrepresentations and / or non-disclosure and / or
in breach of his fiduciary duty.
Notable mandates: Acted for Soltoro Ltd.
in connection with its
successful disposition by plan of arrangement to Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.; co-counsel for Trillium Motor World Ltd.
in class
action against General Motors of Canada Ltd. and Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP; acted for Canadian Solar Inc.
in connection with raising an aggregate of US$ 50 million
in equity and US$ 100 million
in debt financing for acquisition financing and working capital purposes; external counsel to the Regional Municipality of York, providing a wide range of municipal, real estate, expropriation, litigation, and commercial law advice and services; counsel to minority shareholder of a Nevis LLC worth more than US$ 500 million with respect to a claim for relief from unfair prejudice
in litigation
in Nevis and the Commercial Division of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme
Court in British Virgin Islands, and
in contemporaneous related
actions in Belize and the United States.
Successful High
Court action in defamation against a well known leisure retailer following publication of defamatory statements against an individual.
Successful defense of the Republic of Indonesia and its state - owned agencies and instrumentalities
in federal district
court and on appeal
in actions involving fraudulent banking and securities transactions.
He has been lead counsel
in the
successful prosecution of class
action ERISA claims and
in the defense of a class -
action wage claim that has industry - wide application and was argued to the Supreme Judicial
Court.
P1102900227):
Successful defence as lead counsel of a property management company
in a wrongful dismissal
action at trial
in Provincial
Court (Red Deer).
Town of Cochrane v. Austech Holdings Inc. (
Action No. 1101 - 05026):
Successful representation as lead counsel on behalf of the Town of Cochrane
in regard to two summary dismissal applications at the
Court of Queen's Bench.
Co-counsel for a leading manufacturer of appliances (front - loading washing machines)
in the
successful opposition of a multi-province consumer class
action before all levels of the Ontario
courts, and on a leave application to the Supreme
Court of Canada
[34]... [the Applicants] state as a fact that a
Court which, having agreed that certain government
action was inconsistent with the Constitution and having therefore set it aside, will nonetheless be seen to be, and will
in fact be, «
in bed» with the government if it fails to award the
successful applicant its solicitor client costs.
Successful representation of US - based and international clients
in federal and state
courts in a wide range of matters, including claims of breach of licensing, distribution, franchise, agency, brokerage, long - term supply and manufacturing services agreements; cross-border disputes, and trademark infringement
actions on behalf of a fashion house.
Other highlights include securing a third consecutive victory for Credit Suisse
in Idaho federal
court in July 2016 that defeated all remaining claims
in a $ 24 billion class
action regarding loans made to developers of luxury resorts, which followed our
successful defeat of class certification.
The
Court in Perez declined to order that the insurer who defended the
action pay the costs of the
successful plaintiff.
As a result, subject to a
successful appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada — I can't see leave being granted — the
action will proceed, for now, on claims which could produce personal liability for Mr. Trump for, at least, negligent misrepresentation and perhaps fraudulent misrepresentation (see the summary
in para. 159, particular items (3) and (4)-RRB-.
Before both Mr Justice Jack and the
Court of Appeal the employee argued that the clause was not a condition precedent to the payment; instead it was only an ordinary condition giving the employer an
action in damages (ie once the amount had been paid); if
successful in this, he would then have argued that the employers had not exercised their right to rescind the agreement and so had lost the right to damages.
Successful representation of a leading multinational food company
in a wave of false labeling class
actions and private attorney general matters filed
in California, New York, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, Florida, and other state and federal
courts.
We have achieved
successful results for clients at every phase of the class
action litigation process
in both trial and appellate
courts,
in jurisdictions across the country.
We have achieved
successful results for clients at every phase of the class
action litigation process
in both trial and appellate
courts, including obtaining dismissals of class
action complaints, defeating class certification, winning summary judgment motions, prevailing at trial or on appeal, and obtaining highly favorable settlements.
Highlights Monitor the progress of various clients and institute adjustments when necessary Effectively communicate with parolees, fellow parole officers and representatives of the
court Compile and analyze various
court reports Ensure full compliance with State regulations and standard operation procedures of the facility Apply strong problem solving skills
in different situations Assist parolees
in securing jobs and other necessary resources to transition into civilian life Strong public relations skills Proficient
in Microsoft Office Experience Probation Officer 1/1/2010 — Present Central Offender Services — Augusta, GA Manage the cases of several different parolees simultaneously Ensure that parolees have access to needed resources to make a
successful transition out of the system Maintain an
in - depth understanding of the criminal justice system and current and pending laws Hold periodic meetings with paroles to ensure that they are meeting all requirements for their parole Analyze various
court reports to determine appropriate courses of
action with clients Receive and address parolee issues to help keep them on the right path
While the general rule is that a
successful party
in a litigation is entitled to costs from the
court action, one of the factors judges consider is whether the party behaved... Read more
Karen Conti has been a lawyer for 26 years, and is a member of the Illinois, California, and U.S., Supreme
Court bars, She's handled numerous significant cases, including a
successful United States Supreme
Court appeal for the Cook County Democratic Party, the death row appeals of serial killer John Wayne Gacy, a reversal
in the Illinois Supreme
Court in an employment discrimination matter, and a wrongful arrest and injury
action against the Chicago Cubs and Los Angeles Dodgers.