Sentences with phrase «such allegations which»

Allegations of alienation are extraordinarily painful to all involved, and it seems to me that it is the intensity of our emotional response to such allegations which sparks the fight - or - flight response spurring conflict and... [more]

Not exact matches

These are deals by which prosecutors can obtain multimillion - dollar fines from companies facing bribery allegations while sparing them a criminal conviction that would trigger other consequences such as violating covenants signed with lenders or joint - venture partners.
The main allegations go back to 2015 when Facebook was sued for violation of an Illinois state law called the Biometric Information Privacy Act, which regulates information such as fingerprints, retina scans, and facial recognition data.
The multi-year Dominos growth story, which saw the share price soar and the company expand into counter-intuitive markets such as Europe and Japan, appeared to come unstuck in 2017 as the share price went into a tailspin after committing the cardinal sin of failing to meet expectations and fallout from underpayment allegations.
He alleged that the deposit and transfer were approved by Ghana International Bank's Chief Executive, Joseph Mensah, and an allegation which was flatly denied by the latter who claimed he «didn't even have the authority to sanction such a huge amount».
He expressed regret at what he described as complete waste of time on allegations of a bloated register and NHIS card bearers who are not Ghanaians yet the same NPP which jubilated when the Supreme Court directed for the deletion of such names, has turned round complaining its members stand being disenfranchised if the re-registration period is not extended.
I also believe that the spirit of the 1992 Constitution requires the media not to allow themselves to be used for such coarse character attacks and assassination without the media telling the public that they had previously published similar unsupported allegations which have been refuted by the accused.
«While we understand the nervousness of the APC Federal Government over our rebranding and the renewed popularity of the PDP, which has signaled their inevitable death knell, resorting to outlandish allegations will not help them as Nigerians have since seen through such old - fashioned propaganda and gimmicks.
Outside lawyers hired by the Assembly conducted the investigation, which covered Fierro's claims as well as allegations from several former Garcia staff members alleging heavy drinking and sex talk in the office as well as requests by Garcia to perform personal duties such as taking care of her dogs.
«When you look at the technical report which GII added, such that it is a period of two years in which the perception is compiled, when you look at 2016, in that year, you know all the corruption allegations that came to the fore: the bus branding saga, Ghana Standards Authority, NCA [National Communications Authority], Electoral Commission allegations and a host of them that the [Mahama] government did not show any commitment to fighting revelations and scandals that had been made public.»
«So I agree that if there is a particular allegation, which is a subject matter of a trial, then in that case that particular amount, so for instance in the case of Opuni, if there is an amount which is part of a charge sheet, then the state wants to preserve those funds through a freezing order, of course it'll be within the mandate of the state to prevent dissipation of such fund by saying let's freeze.
The trial involved allegations of corruption that were rare even by the standards of Albany, which has seen its share of such trials.
Though Mr Naabu has denied ever making such allegation, made among others, Mr Mohammed insists the law, which proscribes lesbianism, must take its course.
In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, which rocked Hollywood after bringing down the disgraced movie producer after sexual assault allegations spanning decades came to light, also brought to light the alleged behaviours of former Tinseltown kings such as Kevin Spacey and Ryan Seacrest.
Sadly, that notion has persisted to this day, which is why so many African - American women's rape allegations aren't taken seriously, like that of the NYC hotel maid who recently leveled just such a claim against a well - connected guest from France.
Last summer, Candice Jackson, the acting head of the OCR, dismissed the severity of the issue by asserting that 90 percent of such allegations on campus «fall into the category of «we were both drunk,» «we broke up, and six months later I found myself under a Title IX investigation,... `'» a statement for which she subsequently apologized.
They're also responsible for a few projects they'd rather forget such as How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life, which was withdrawn from market last year following allegations of plagiarism (Boston Globe article).
These trends had been exacerbated since the 1990s by the fragmentation of media (Internet, talk radio), which promoted counter-scientific beliefs such as fear of vaccines among even educated people, by providing facile elaborations of false arguments and a ceaseless repetition of allegations.
Upon receipt of written allegations of research misconduct, the Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School shall promptly provide a copy of such written allegations to the budget executive and budget administrator of the area in which the accused individual is primarily employed, and the Director of The Office For Research Protections.
While the panel took into account «the investment in these proceedings, in terms of time, emotion and money and the genuine public interest and importance in knowing the findings of the panel in respect of the allegations which have been made,» it found that the disclosure failings were «an abuse of the process which is of such seriousness that it offends the panel's sense of justice and propriety».
These instances then become subject to dueling legal arguments as to fault which are best addressed by retaining legal counsel familiar with CA law and who is able to review the police accident report or obtain other evidence such as witness statements that can support an allegation of negligence and provide a means for collection of damages for medical costs, lost wages and emotional distress.
He has a record of achieving success on clients» behalf, such as working with a team to obtain summary judgment in favor of a national actuarial firm which had faced allegations of malpractice.
Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the Innocence Project, says such scandals are definitely more «observable» thanks to the passage of the Innocence Protection Act in 2004, which requires states that receive federal funding for DNA databanks to certify the existence of an independent entity to investigate labs against which serious allegations of misconduct or negligence have been raised.
The Indemnified Party shall have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action and to participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall not be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party if the Indemnifying Party has assumed the defense of the action with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party; provided that the fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party if (i) the employment of such counsel has been specifically authorized in writing by the Indemnifying Party or (ii) the named parties to any such action (including any impleaded parties) include both the Indemnified Party or parties and the Indemnifying Party and, in the judgement of counsel for the Indemnified Party, it is advisable for the Indemnified Party or parties to be represented by separate counsel (in which case the Indemnifying Party shall not have the right to assume the defense of such action on behalf of the Indemnified Party or parties, it being understood, however, that the Indemnifying Party shall not, in connection with any one such action or separate but substantially similar or related actions in the same jurisdiction arising out of the same general allegations or circumstances, be liable for the reasonable fees and expenses of more than one separate firm of attorneys for the Indemnified Party or parties.
The defendant therefore knew the time - frame within which the allegedly defamatory statements were said to have been made, such that the allegations could not be said to be unduly vague.
Google's answer to Bedrock's third amended complaint was submitted on February 10, 2011 by the Texas - based firm of Potter Minton and the top - notch global firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which also defends certain Android device makers (such as Motorola and HTC) against Android - related patent infringement allegations.
Do they also cover other risks the participants may encounter, such as theft of personal property, slips and falls, personal injury resulting from violent clients or allegations of breaching the Human Rights Code, to name a few risks which may be relevant depending on the circumstances?
The «law of multiples» which can take many forms such as multiple lawyers doing the same type of work (or based on the same guidance) that leads to class action potential when there's an allegation that they all did it wrong; or the same lawyer is sued over doing the same (alleged wrong) thing multiple times; or a lawyer undertakes many mortgage transactions without considering that there are red flags that need to be brought to the attention of the lender — such as a significant increase in the value of the property in a very short period of time or inexplicable credits.
The «law of multiples» which can take many forms such as multiple lawyers doing the same type of work (or based on the same guidance) that leads to class action potential when there's an allegation that they all did it wrong; or the same lawyer is sued over doing the same (allegedly wrong) thing multiple times; or a lawyer undertakes many mortgage transactions without considering that there are red flags that need to be brought to the attention of the lender — such as a significant increase in the value of the property in a very short period of time or inexplicable credits.
The Bingham Centre makes the valid point that the fact that cases such as Al Rawi (allegations of rendition and torture by the security services which resulted in a large civil settlement) have meant courts ordering more disclosure from the security services may be more a result of policy changes by the security services than of judicial activism which needs to be reined in.
Experienced counsel can be the difference in such hearings and trials, and can sometimes work with the Crown to reach a compromise in which the Crown agrees to drop allegations of the use or possession of such weapons or firearms.
Stadlen J said the allegations against Bonhoeffer: «Could hardly be more serious... If proved, they would have a potentially devastating effect on his career, reputation and financial position... not only is this a classic case of one person's word against another but because the other alleged victims live in Kenya, neither the claimant nor the FTPP nor the GMC has any legal power to compel their attendance... It is hard to imagine circumstances in which the ability to cross-examine the uncorroborated allegations of a single witness would assume a greater importance to a professional man faced with such serious allegations
It is useful to quote key observations by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay evidence, the requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors pointing against the admission of the hearsay evidence... The means by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my view diminish the weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.
Some readers here, including some of the lawyers perusing the comments section, may enjoy viewing my YouTube video response to the arrogant and aggressive cease and desist demand letter that I received from Stikeman Elliott litigation lawyer Maitre Marc - André Coulombe which, amongst other foolish things, falsely accused me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel for allegedly making «unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the (Unitarian Universalist) Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape.»
The Team draws upon the specialist knowledge and experience that its members have built up throughout the vast range of work in which such allegations are made.
In such actions which involve an allegation of child abuse, abandonment, or neglect as defined in s. 39.01, which allegation is verified and determined by the court to be well - founded, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for the child.
A third party can bring negligent misrepresentation allegations against professional individuals or entities who provide false information due to lack of competence or failure to exercise proper care in preparing information which is relied upon by a third party and such reliance is foreseeable to the professional.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z