Sentences with phrase «such alleged misconduct»

Not exact matches

The Liberals have also attempted to counter the image of Prime Minister Stephen Harper put forth by the Conservative Party, instead portraying him as a controlling and secretive leader with a hidden agenda, and attacking his judgment by tying him to past Conservative scandals, such as the Cadman affair, alleged spending misconduct in the last election, and the conduct of Maxime Bernier, the former Conservative minister of foreign affairs.

Needless to say that the alleged misconduct of the National Chairman does not warrant such a sanction, a more matured and unifying flagbearer would have intervened for a reversal of this illegal decision for the sake of unity and peace.

Like every such revelation, Harvard's August disclosure of Hauser's alleged scientific misconduct sparked interest in the causes and frequency of scientific deception.

From where Casey sits, the criticism of Brown and others about the unwillingness of the AFT to embrace any reform of the obsolete process for teacher dismissals — including the Big Apple affiliate's successful opposition to Bloomberg's effort this year to give the city's schools chancellor final say over dismissing those alleged and convicted of criminal misconduct (and those engaged in inappropriate behavior with students)-- amounts to» a vicious slander» geared to «chip away at public support for the due process rights» and to «distract» people from the city's failures to put more effort into firing such teachers.

The charges must be in writing, set forth the alleged misconduct explicitly and in detail and be filed in duplicate with the Corresponding Secretary together with a deposit of $ 250.00, which shall be forfeited if such charges are not sustained by the Board or a Board committee following a hearing.

This expertise includes handling cases alleging constitutional violations and police misconduct such as excessive force and unlawful arrest claims as well as state claims of negligent training, investigation and malicious prosecution.

The case creates a «very high threshold» for regulated health professionals seeking to challenge a proposed interim suspension or interim conditions, in the face of a complaint alleging serious misconduct, such as sexual abuse, says Lad Kucis, partner and co-chairman of the health law group with Gardiner Roberts LLP in Toronto.

As the article describes, Daniel Elia, a former disgruntled client of Buffalo based law firm, Damon & Morey has created a website, damon-moreymisconduct.com, to broadcast Elia's complaints about the firm's alleged misconduct, such as charging unreasonable fees and failing to disclose a conflict of interest when the firm represented Elia and one of his creditors in a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy case.

To obtain the order, a plaintiff must show the Court that it has the makings of a strong case, that the damage to the plaintiff of the defendant's alleged misconduct is very serious, that there is convincing evidence that the defendant has in its possession incriminating documents or items, and that there is a real possibility that the defendant may destroy such material before discovery.

The necessity of such immunity (as well as the limits of such immunity where a plaintiff alleges bad faith conduct) is illustrated in the Ontario case of Deep v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 5248 (September 23, 2010), where the College revoked the claimant's certificate of registration based on findings of professional misconduct and incompetence.

Even if one could say that such treatment reflects some policy of the various foreign states involved, or indeed of the United Kingdom, it goes far beyond any conduct previously recognised as requiring judicial abstention... The critical point in my view is the nature and seriousness of the misconduct alleged in both cases before the Supreme Court, at however high a level it may have been authorised... Sovereign states who without justification and without permitting access to justice detain or mistreat individuals in the course or in relation to their conduct of foreign relations or affairs have sovereign immunity in foreign domestic courts.

Scott routinely defends employers in investigations conducted by governmental agencies such as the EEOC, PHRC, DOL, and NLRB, and he conducts and oversees internal corporate investigations of alleged fraud, embezzlement, theft, discrimination, harassment, and other forms of employee misconduct.

«It's difficult to believe that such a widespread, intentional, alleged misconduct went unnoticed by senior executives,» says John Ratchford, principal and general counsel for Navigator Ltd. in Toronto.

A no fault divorce means that neither spouse is alleging that any misconduct — such as abuse, adultery or abandonment — led to the end of the marriage.

If your spouse denies his misconduct or contests the divorce, you may have to provide evidence, such as testimony or documents, to prove the grounds you alleged.