Sentences with phrase «such argumentation»

Within this structure, the details are argueable, but we will at least have a reasonable basis within which such argumentation will take place.

Such argumentation should be augmented, not replaced, by a translation into lay language.

While widely controverted, such argumentation is actually as unavoidable for a fully critical theology as are the other types we have considered.

We must also note that Cyprian is using such argumentation techniques to reiterate that water alone is not enough to symbolise the blood of the Lord, but that wine is absolutely indispensable.

Not exact matches

Also, you should know that you should back up your claims with a bit more of argumentation (e.g., why would the multiverse hypothesis fail Occam's razor; you can't honestly believe that I would just accept such a conclusion without asking for the justification).

The way to such heightened sensitivity is not by means of philosophical analysis and argumentation at all.

Indeed, since the movement of the argumentation (such as it is) is towards first principles - including this single first principle - and since scientific argumentation is from first principles, any strictly - speaking demonstrative argumentation would have to be limited to preliminary and ancillary issues, such as whether material substances are properly - speaking forms or rather composites, etc..

As such, testimony is an element in a treatise on argumentation.

That we all crave for such valuation does not need lengthy argumentation.

Indeed, such a form of argumentation ultimately proves to be as much required for a fully critical theology as are the others we have discussed, intended as it is to clarify what they necessarily presuppose concerning the applicability or capacity for existential illustration of the concepts they employ.

I turn now to the types of argumentation required for the critical theological appropriation of such a preliminary interpretation of the data of experience, taken as evidentially relevant for theology.

My main interest here is in the structure and the demands of theological argumentation as such, not in an interpretation of Ogden's theological argumentation.

This type of argument is again broadly evidentiary in nature, although it reflects not the «turn to the subject» characteristic of the appeal to individual experience, but rather a «pragmatic» or «linguistic» turn, as illustrated by Whitehead's observation that the evidence of human experience as shared by civilized intercommunication «is also diffused throughout the meanings of words and linguistic expressions» (cited in TPT 74).12 Such an appeal is an essentially historical form of argumentation.

It is in such illustration that the «coherence» of argumentation may properly be said to consist.

Because first - order theological argumentation does and must presuppose the second - order assertions that presuppositional analysis uncovers, such presuppositional assertions invariably shape the hermeneutical analysis employed in any first - order presentation of experiential data.

Such a hermeneutical aspect of experiential argumentation is not, therefore, distinctive of any particular «methodological alternative,» but rather ingredient in them all.

Rationalistic theologies, such as Charles Hartshorne's, are based largely on a priori reason or rational argumentation, and deem these valuable precisely because they are not particular.

Not to mention the circular argumentation that presents itself by such a belief is astounding... it is or exists because god did therefore it is and exists because god did... etc..

Where I say: God's aim (that of God's consequent nature) is achieved, and remains open, because it is an aim which continually «shifts» (and can be such because God's aim is formally independent of any actual world whatsoever, but materially consequent on the evolving world, Nobo says: the aim of God's primordial nature is never achieved, but the data available at the beginning of every stage are synthesized every time, and this is sufficient for prehensibility — not the same argumentation, as can be seen, but a closely related one, indeed.

In his new book, Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric, University of Winnipeg philosopher Douglas Walton proposes that fallacies such as the ad hominem are better understood as perversions or corruptions of perfectly good arguments.

Such activities should motivate them to question and investigate; make predictions; collect, analyze and interpret data; refine their questions; and engage in argumentation from evidence.

One such concept found within the language arts standards is that of argumentation — teaching students to reason systematically in pursuit of an idea, an action, or a theory, and also to evaluate the reasoning of others.

«Current automated essay - scoring systems can not directly assess some of the more cognitively demanding aspects of writing proficiency, such as audience awareness, argumentation, critical thinking, and creativity... A related weakness of automated scoring is that these systems could potentially be manipulated by test takers seeking an unfair advantage.

The introduction of such essay should bring the light on your mindset, analysis and argumentation skills as regards to the main idea.

; I suggest that this is a very common argument (perfected by Daly and acolytes) and we should think about this as a sub-category of argumentation and address it as such.

I'm sure such articles exist which make the point that a need exists to stop entertaining irrational pseudo-scientific argumentation

Such cases have made economic argumentation less convincing but believing that the situation is the same for all other problems is just naive.

«The system of scholastic disputations encouraged in the Universities of the middle ages had unfortunately trained men to habits of indefinite argumentation, and they often preferred absurd and extravagant propositions, because greater still was required to maintain them; the end and object of such intellectual combats being victory and not truth.

Earlier planned litigation strategies (such as campaigns for school desegregation and for the abolition of capital punishment) took place primarily within the court system, employing legal argumentation as the mechanism for social change.

The above arguments are based upon the constitutional law doctrine of «structural argumentation» (see: Robin M. Elliott, «References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size argumentation» (see: Robin M. Elliott, «References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size they see fit.

The firm says the partnership will enable it to apply a range of leading - edge computer science expertise in areas such as text processing, network analysis, computational argumentation and data mining.