Sentences with phrase «such arguments have»

While such arguments have mainly used approaches based on distributive justice and equity, this paper examines the issues of economic efficiency involved in the protection of TK.

First, the member state could argue that its obligations under EU law take priority over its BIT obligations, in which case the priority of one obligation over the other can only be established by applying conflict rules, but such arguments have not been raised in intra-EU arbitrations (apart from conflict arguments challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunals which is a different matter).

Such arguments have failed to convince the Community, which wants to help poverty - stricken fishermen and stop overfishing by giving fishermen other occupations.

Moreover, whenever such arguments have been advanced, well - known counter-arguments have been rehearsed, including the difficulties in disentangling «English» from «UK» legislation; the knock - on effects for the allocation of funding across the UK; and risk of an in - built bias in favour of the Conservatives.

Such arguments have been dismissed by advocates as wrinkles that could be overcome.

Such arguments have a long and distinguished pedigree, and they certainly strengthen my own faith.

Such an argument has great populist appeal; trade union demagogues love it.

Such an argument would mean that owning stock could also not be private ownership.

Such argument has been put up by ACEP, who know very well that both the first and the second KARPOWER barges do not operate on gas or light crude, hence the operators can not be bothered about the availability or otherwise of the two types of fuel.

In theory it's arguable whether putting attractive people doing suggestive dance moves on film constitutes cinema, but when you actually see it, the style, energy and sex appeal included, you'd realize any such argument would fail.

Substituting race for class in such an argument would make it perilously near to the views that were attributed to Charles Murray and Richard Hernnstein in their controversial book The Bell Curve.

But it seems to me that such arguments would be focused on a range of likely magnitude — not whether any anomalous increases will be observable.

And no, this is not an argument from authority, although such an argument would be as flimsy as saying that because lots of people review something, the reviewing process is better.

As to renegotiations, it seems that accepting such an argument would be highly unlikely in light of the case law of the Court.

However, the law is mixed in this area, and the success of any such argument would be highly fact - specific.

But it seems that such an argument would be a theoretical extension of the current constitutional framework.

I had thought that such arguments had been debunked a lot of years ago, when there are other legitimate criteria for appointment, diversity being the main one.

Not exact matches

That's not to say Fraser - Jenkins is opposed to bucking conventional thought — he readily acknowledges the importance of such behavior throughout history and says research - driven arguments have helped shape the world we live in today.

So while there are certainly arguments to be made in favor of a rules - based Fed over the pure discretion of the current PhD standard, such reform should not be viewed as a solution to the real issue, which is a central bank having a monopoly on money at all.

* But there is also a valid policy argument that companies that own both cable channels and cable wires have excessive power over pricing, and that blocking such a merger is a good use of anti-trust power — even if it's an argument you'd usually hear from the left side of the aisle.

It would be interesting to know whether Pfizer could have used such an argument or whether it would have been a moot point given its problems with well - known status.

In a fascinating post on The Conversation blog, Maynard makes an argument that won't surprise anyone who has read any fictional account of human's interplanetary future — colonizing other planets probably won't bring out the better angels of our nature, and any attempt to put people on Mars will require overcoming serious social and political problems, such as:

In the olden days, voters during presidential races would get into heated arguments over such amusingly quaint topics as tax policy, health care, and the future of Social Security.

Fischer, who has argued in the past that the Fed needed to be wary of being too slow in raising interest rates, made no such argument on Sunday.

Critics have argued that Twitter only allows such behavior because it is desperate for engagement and user growth, which is similar to the argument for why Facebook doesn't care about fake news.

Such over-egged warnings have cost the PM credibility, and weakened better - founded arguments about how Brexit would hit the economy.

But he has studiously avoided using such arguments to market his product.

Tolling has proven to be politically dangerous in Canada because of such arguments.

The «bank for central banks» has released a paper on the possible impact of state - issued cryptocurrencies, as well as arguments for and against the introduction of such monetary instruments.

«Canadians broadly believe in shifting towards cleaner sources of energy, because they are convinced doing so will benefit the planet, and are unconvinced by the argument that such a transition would gravely damage the economy.

You make the classic argument that the benefits of a booming tradable sector such as oil and gas must, ipso facto, outweigh the decline in other sectors — otherwise they wouldn't be generating enough demand to result in an increase in the country's currency.

For example, some time back HFT was blamed for higher volatility in the cattle market, even though such trading represents a smaller fraction of cattle trading than it does for other contracts, and especially since there is precious little in the way of a theoretical argument that would support such a connection.

Other counterarguments describe Fiat currency creation and distribution costs, such as printing bills or minting coins or the cost of building a bank or credit union branch, however the latter argument is less impactful given that substantial number of branches that have already closed and are projected to close over the next decade as consumer preferences switch to mobile banking.

In light of what you said about the need to look beyond bilateral trade flows, how would you reply to such arguments?

What about the argument that the equity - risk premium (the premium that investors demand over risk - free assets such as government bonds) has fallen close to zero because of greater economic stability?

A strong argument could be made that the stock market has changed to such a degree that equity prices are operating on a new plateau.

While this sounds like monetary madness, it should be remembered that Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the US Federal Reserve, urged such action on the Japanese government a decade ago to deal with that country's deflationary crisis, and referenced Milton Friedman's argument that a central bank financed stimulus via a «helicopter drop» of money could have saved the United States from the Great Depression.

And that 2:1 ratio of today's earnings yield versus a triple - B bond rate adjusted for taxes is such a compelling argument that people have a hard time with the rationality of it.

Politicians who advocate for more bitumen pipelines and LNG exports are making a «have your cake and eat it too argument» because there is no way Canada can meet its climate change commitments under such a scenario says David Hughes, one of the nation's top energy experts.

Much of your argument such as I've seen, for your sky fairy (and I really think that is an appropriate term for your obviously fictional deity with all the self - contradictory tales about it in the bible), really seems to consist of a combination of willed ignorance and arguments from ignorance.

Since January, DeMoss has spent about half his time making such arguments, stressing to clients that the work is not official firm business.

2) I don't know where you got this idea of life not being capable of symmetry, I've never heard such an argument, what is this based on?

Ironicus, I do understand your argument, but if you're correct and this is so clear - cut, why has it taken this long for such action?

The argument being, that to allow such a person who is openly advocating something that the Church has historical deemed a «sin»... you get the point.

If there are no such lines in the bible (there aren't) then you have absolutely no argument to make.

I'm sorry but you're not making an argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible when then you start casting stones left and right and attacking your fellow man?

I wonder if Joel Baden would make such an over-simplified argument to a group of Holocaust survivors.

Of course, to put abortion in such simple, black and white terms can be shocking to some — and many pro-abortion activists would disagree, saying that a child is not human or nor a person or does not possess rights, or some other such argument.

It is no accident that Percy summons Flannery O'Connor to such questions as well; but unlike her, he does not anchor his response in St. Augustine and St. Paul (we have here no abiding place) nor in St. Thomas, whose argument is insistent that the poet's, the artist's, responsibility is to the good of the thing being made, not with the correction of appetites in his audience.

It is embarrassing to admit it, but I did think Chad might be sufficiently well informed to hold up his end of an argument and perhaps enjoy doing so such that it would be a friendly and provocative interaction.