Sentences with phrase «such as arbiter»

Not exact matches

(c) Science may claim that its knowledge of the universe is such as to entitle it to be the sole and final arbiter of existence and its problems.

As such, it is not capable of bigotry but is the arbiter of the bigotries of others.

The fund would act as a de facto arbiter of the developed world's carbon emissions, allowing offending countries to offset their pollution through such payments.

We run the leading pan-industry awards and the main arbiter of book trade success - including categories such as Publisher of the Year, Independent Bookshop of the Year and Literary Agent of the Year.

Each book argued that the art critic as art - world arbiter may be a thing of the past, and that that may not be such a terrible development.

Yet, there are no lawyers explicitly invited to advise on the smart contracts people are placing on blockchain platforms such as Ethereum, and if there is a dispute it is solved by a lay panel of arbiters, which again may include no lawyers at all.

Counsel need to ensure that the expert witness understands matters such as the difference between the legal burden of proof and scientific certainty, the need to clarify the facts and assumptions underlying the expert's opinion, the need to confine the report to matters within the expert witness's area of expertise and the need to avoid usurping the court's function as the ultimate arbiter of the issues.

As such, you should carefully consider any such clause in the agreement you sign, especially how arbiters and mediators are appointed.

With language that speaks to a variety of issues, such as the selected administrative body, the delineated powers of the arbiters, the scope of discovery and more, arbitration clauses can shape and frame the overall dispute resolution strategy.

Nor can I discern in those First Amendment considerations that led us to restrict the States» powers to regulate defamation of public officials any additional interest that is not served by the actual malice rule of New York Times, supra, but is substantially promoted by utilizing this Court as the ultimate arbiter of factual disputes in those libel cases where no unusual factors, such as allegations of harassment or the existence of a jury verdict resting on erroneous instructions, cf. New York Times, supra, are present.

Does it carry too much baggage with it around issues such as expecting search engines to be arbiters, and what its ramifications are to the concept of consent?