The question is almost semantic: what is the meaning of the expression «no - feedback», when
such changes are considered that are themselves at least partially feedback.
The poor whose survival depends on
such changes are considered enemies.
The poor whose hopes for a dignified life or even survival depend on
such changes are considered enemies.
When should
such a change be considered likely to occur?
As the Department has explained in the Response to Comment section above,
such changes were considered but rejected.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in
such forward - looking statements and that should
be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but
are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of
changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any
changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones
such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by
such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate
changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws,
such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws
such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of
changes in tax law,
such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that
was enacted on December 22, 2017, and
changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of
such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not
be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse
changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
If you don't, and aren't thrilled with the one you do have, it may
be time to
consider a career
change — despite the stress, retraining and income disruption
such decisions invariably entail.
While Facebook can (and probably will) retroactively
change its terms of service so that
such ads aren't
considered unwanted, the ombudsman may have a point.
«We have no specific indication or information that Ottawa
is seriously
considering such a
change... other than to note that [the Department of Finance]
is casting about for revenues, they
are taking a long look at all so - called tax expenditures, and this government seems to have few qualms about taxing the «rich».»
It sets out how the Reserve Bank Board thinks about
such changes and its focus when
considering the implications and whether a policy response
is necessary.
Factors
considered by Mr. Buffett in setting Mr. Hamburg's salary
are typically subjective,
such as his perception of Mr. Hamburg's performance and any
changes in functional responsibility.
At the same time, technological
changes spawned new competitors in some industries,
such as telecommunications, that once
were considered natural monopolies.
The typical economic reports
such as the consumer price index, GDP growth, Tankan index, and so on,
are also
considered potent drivers of the EUR / JPY cross, but they don't reach the degree of consideration accredited to stock market
changes and the Bank of Japan decisions.
Considering that US stocks have
been in a 5 - year bull market, it would
be unreasonable to expect
such bullish momentum to
change overnight.
«We have advised our clients to
consider reducing their equity exposure, especially in 401 (k) and other tax - deferred accounts since there would
be no tax implications in making
such changes,» he said.
Here
's the rest of it:»... Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can
be shown to exist, each grade
being useful to its possessor, as
is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations
be inherited, as
is likewise certainly the case; and if
such variations should
be useful to any animal under
changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could
be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not
be considered as subversive of the theory.
It must
be acknowledged, however, that questions
such as those raised by the awareness of
change are not usually included among the inquiries
considered appropriate to science.
Such a Christianisation would not discredit all theories or
change all work habits in domains generally
considered to
be non-religious.
If you continue with
such claims you'll get the fortress, if you
are open to
considering my request about attending to how you express then perhaps things can
change in the way you see me engage.
Yet when God
is interpreted in this fashion, the consequence
is that
such a negative attitude towards novelty and
change is given augmented power and those who think in this way
consider their own established interests divinely approved and heavenly sanction given to their own rejection of developments which would call these interests in question.
Theories of modernization, despite the rather serious attacks to which they have
been subjected in recent years, have
been so prominent in the social sciences, and have played
such an important role in our thinking about social
change, that any effort to
consider the
changing relations between states and religious institutions must begin here.
The fact
is though, the religious community would
be the most up in arms about
such a
change if one
were seriously
considered.
Ether the bible and by extension god condones slavery or the verses
are completely scrambled through translation and transcription over time
such that their message
is substantially
changed from the original intent, in which case nothing in the bible can
be considered a reliable record of the original.
Some may believe that the most reasonable response to some of what we as humans experience — for example,
changed lives or unusual events —
is to assume that God unilaterally intervenes at times in earthly affairs and thus conclude that any theistic perspective that does not allow for
such intervention must
be considered inadequate.
Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can
be shown to exist, each grade
being useful to its possessor, as
is certain the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations
be inherited, as
is likewise certainly the case; and if
such variations should
be useful to any animal under
changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could
be formed by natural selection, should not
be considered as subversive of the theory.»
But since, according to Locke, all our ideas when carefully
considered contain some sort of relation (to action or
change), and sensible qualities
such as colors and smells have some relation to our perception, the idea of power
is no more complex than our ideas of figure, motion, and sensible qualities.
Considering that mutations, to name one method of generating new DNA sequences, can
be detrimental as well as beneficial and each to varying degrees of hurt or help, I seriously doubt that just the number of DNA
changes would
be such a measure, even if
such a number could
be known given possibility of overwrites and deletions.
For health benefits and how long it will take to experience them, there
are a lot of factors to
consider such as other dietary and lifestyle
changes.
I have seriously
been considering a few
changes for my site but it seems like
such a big undertaking, I didn't know where to start.
Of course it would
be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let
's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has
been for this club... I
'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I
'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad
are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real
change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel
such thoughts and it
's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary
changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it
's not your fault, both sides
are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have
been percolating for several years... it
's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we
are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie
's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which
was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to
be honest, the thing that scares me most
is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which
considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players
is more than a little disconcerting
This
is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it
's former self, only to
be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions
are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud
was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances
was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin
's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which
was obvious to Wenger because there
was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that
being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka
is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he
is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let
's face it Wenger
was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this
was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he
's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense
considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team
's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player
was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround
such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who
are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would
be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all
change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that
is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there
is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest
such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he
's lack of mobility
is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would
be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other
was just sold to Juve... man, this
is theraputic because following this team
is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Wenger has suggested that he had
considered the
change in formation long before Arsenal's disastrous spell of defeats this season, but felt the players
were not experienced enough to make
such a transition during a difficult period.
«It may
be that American mothers
are so desperate for power, recognition, and validation that we'd rather take on the burden of
considering ourselves «expert» moms rather than
change the circumstances that demand
such an unreasonable role for us.»
Considering equipment, this diaper
changing pad comes with handy front zip compartment that has a purpose to keep your personal items
such as cellphone, wallet or keys and also contains a small clipped - strap that can
be hang easily in order to stroller your waist.
All of us involved in youth sports - from parents, to coaches, from athletic trainers to school athletic directors to the athletes themselves - have a responsibility to do what we can to make contact and collision sports safer, whether it by reducing the number of hits to the head a player receives over the course of a season (
such as N.F.L. and the Ivy League
are doing in limiting full - contact practices, and the Sports Legacy Institute recently proposed
be considered at the youth and high school level in its Hit Count program), teaching football players how to tackle without using their head (as former pro football player Bobby Hosea has long advocated),
changing the rules (as the governing body for high school hockey in Minnesota did in the aftermath of the Jack Jablonski injury or USA Hockey did in banning body checks at the Pee Wee level), or giving serious consideration to whether athletes below a certain age should
be playing tackle football at all (as the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend).
Despite
being a natural rite of passage for small children, behaviors can also
be brought on or exacerbated by what babies
consider dramatic life
changes,
such as:
Stress and anxiety
are important to
consider, especially if your child has experienced a recent major
change in her life,
such as the birth of a new sibling, a family move, parental divorce, the death of a family member or pet, or starting preschool.
Without the demonstrated support of
such large volume buyers, many companies may not
consider making big
changes in their products beyond what
's mandated by the new federal regulations.
While it
is intimidating to
consider sending your son away from home,
such programs can
be life
changing for troubled teens.
However, when it came to globally contested serious issues
such as the meaning of power, she
was equally forthcoming: «I think that we must
change the ideology of
being powerful... A country with more literate and educated people, a country with more skillful people, a country which has given equal rights to its citizens should
be considered the superpower.
Being recently affected by this I
am considering whether to campaign for a
change in the law to grant
such a right (unless the testator explicitly revokes it) so I
am interested in arguments for and against it.
Hence much of the
changes that many Argentines credit the Kirchners for having brought about (
such as family subsidies, higher employment levels and stronger purchasing power despite rising inflation, as well as access to services and products that the poor
were suddenly able to access post-2001)
are expected to yield wide turnout among Argentina's poorer classes, without the Frente para la Victoria having to worry about registering — and then turning out — those who might
be considered marginal voters in the US.
Jerome Bonso, Chairman of the National League for Free and Fair Elections, told IRIN in Kinshasa underlines that these elections
are taking place in a different context from 2006: «We have to
consider events
such as the Arab spring where the population spearheaded
change in their countries» leadership.
If we try to summary the whole answer, then we may say that the norms
are not there, but two important aspects have to
be considered: Threat to peace and security and massive human rights violations; meanwhile, if there
are not
such cases, and the
change has gone through the due process of law and the new government has
been able to gain the most support of the member states, then the new government
is recognized.
The format of the initiatives meant that they not only learnt about the science of environmental problems
such as climate
change, but
were also engaged in
considering solutions and how to bring them about, both in terms of their own lives and community and the wider political context.
When an Espaillat supporter, after prefacing his question with a reference to «middle east... dictators... in power for
such a long time, 30 years, 40 years» asked «when
is too long», King first noted Espaillat's 18 years in the state legislature, but then veered off message saying that «if someone wants real
change» they should
consider the third candidate, Michael Walrond.
[27] Contrastingly, Livingstone believed that grassroots campaigning —
such as the 1968 student protests —
were ineffective, joining Labour because he
considered it the best chance for implementing progressive political
change in the UK.
The New York State Law Revision Commission
is tasked by Section 72 of the Legislative Law with examining and
considering proposed
changes in the law, recommending
such changes in the law as it deems necessary, and reporting its proceedings annually to the Legislature with proposed bills to carry out any of its recommendations.
«However, the central lesson that future governments must learn from the experience of these reforms
is that never again should
such substantial
changes to qualifications that
are critical to the life chances of young people
be handled in
such an incoherent and ill -
considered way.»
Fellow county executive candidate, Legislator Ilan Schoenberger, contends that any
such changes can not
be made until 2020 and that there
are a few issues the public and the government must
consider before reducing the size of the County Legislature.