Sentences with phrase «such claims does»

Such a claim does little more than reduce theological truth to catechesis.»

However, this effort failed in 1973 as a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in San Antonio v. Rodriquez that such claims did not have a basis under federal equal protection laws.

Thus, any company that claims its products to be «human grade» on its website when such a claim does not appear on the label itself should be eyed with due suspicion as to the truthfulness of the claim.

While some are claiming that trees fully foliated with dead leaves is normal or natural, such a claim does not hold up to objective investigation of the leaf abscission process.

So, I take it you understand that the claim «there has been no statistically significant warming since 1995» is merely an indication of the speaker's ignorance of this meaning, and are happy to acknowledge that those on the «sceptical» side of the debate who parrot such claims don't know what they are talking about.

An uninsured motorist claim should not increase the insured's rates and filing such a claim does not preclude bringing a claim against the negligent driver.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

«Yelp has never done this and individuals making such claims are either misinformed, or more typically, have an axe to grind — whether businesses upset that Yelp will not remove reviews they don't like, or unscrupulous internet marketing «experts» trying to make a buck off of honest business owners with dubious reputation management schemes.»

Cargill claims to be the largest private company in the U.S. in terms of revenue and, although private companies like Nilsson Brothers and Cargill are not required to have independent directors, forward - thinking ones do such as McCain Foods.

They do it by posing to be a legitimate entity — such as the IRS — and sending an email message claiming that there's a problem such as a refund which can be fixed by installing attached software.

The Arbitration shall be held either: (i) at a location determined by JAMS (or, if applicable, AAA) pursuant to the Applicable Rules (provided that such location is reasonably convenient for you and does not require travel in excess of 100 miles from your home or place of business); or (ii) at such other location as may be mutually agreed upon by you and NBCUniversal; or (iii) at your election, if the only claims in the arbitration are asserted by you and are for less than $ 10,000 in aggregate, by telephone or by written submission.

Thompson and others, however, argue that given the amount of resources Facebook is throwing into video, it is bound to solve these problems eventually, and doing so will make the platform — as well as other strong contenders such as Snapchat, which claims 10 billion video views a day — far more competitive when it comes to bidding for traditional consumer ad spending.

Heidi Shey, a senior analyst at Forrester who studies the cyber insurance space, says insurers are in an excited «land - grab» state, gobbling up as many customers as they can because insurers believe most businesses will not file a claim, or there could be a cyber event that doesn't get covered due to an exemption, such as human error, credit card fraud, or email fraud.

Fortune pointed to the quarterly report Tesla had filed just three days after the crash, warning that»... we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected resulting in personal injury or death,» and specifically calling out Autopilot as a technology that could result in such claims and materially affect financial performance.

Primer's approach has already won over U.S. spy agencies (Gourley claims he doesn't know which, since In - Q - Tel manages the relationship with the individual agencies) and other early customers, such as Singapore's sovereign wealth fund GIC and retail giant Walmart (wmt).

Despite those claims, several chaebols contacted by CNBC indicated they didn't encounter any such ambivalence when it came to sponsoring the games.

But practitioners, such as the employee - owners of Reflexite, a maker of reflective material in Avon, Conn. (see «Collective Effort,» January 1992, [Article link]-RRB-, claim ESOPs do all of the above and more when employees play an active role in company decision making.

Written by insurance - claims specialists at Coopers & Lybrand, the brochure is chock - full of useful information, such as what your company should do during the first 30 days after a disaster, how you should quantify your losses on work in process and finished goods, how to calculate business - interruption costs, and most important of all, how to wrap up all the paperwork quickly.

Amid the harsh criticisms are notes such as «Why do people working for lululemon claim to be «authentic» when actually they end up robotically cloning their charismatic leader, Chip Wilson?»

Claims made in this article do not constitute investment advice and should not be taken as such.

You might think these days such a claim would not pass the laugh test, but that did not stop financial liberalization from being pushed at the WTO ministerial meeting held in July 2008.

You acknowledge, consent and agree that we may access, preserve, and disclose your registration and any other information you provide if required to do so by law or in a good faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) comply with legal process; (b) enforce this Agreement; (c) respond to claims of a violation of the rights of third - parties; (d) respond to your requests for customer service; or (e) protect the rights, property, or personal safety of The Defense Alliance of Minnesota, The Defense Alliance of Minnesota Affiliates, its users and the public.

If our records show that documents proving age or citizenship / lawful alien status have already been submitted for an earlier Medicare or Social Security claim (such as Disability, Supplemental Security Income, etc.), you do not need to submit the documents again.

Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.

There is no evidence for such a claim, and it doesn't pass the smell test.

However, despite Wylie's dramatic claims that he and Cambridge «broke Facebook,» the harvesting of such data, even from users» friends who didn't clearly consent, does seem to have been clearly allowed by Facebook at the time, and many app developers had similar practices.

Is this a Lieutenant Governor in Council Policy or total incompetence at AHS??? Or is it Staff reluctant to do the extra paper work and not having access to billing code numbers such as the staff at the dentist office or other health services who can claim the benefit directly??

Further, we do not warrant or make any representations concerning the use, validity, accuracy, completeness, likely results or reliability of any claims, statements or information in this note or otherwise relating to such materials or on any websites linked to this note.

Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that such alleged scientific truth regarding ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.

his whole point was that those who * feign * humility in claiming «no one can make such exclusive claims» are actually DOING the very thing to which they're objecting.

As such it would seem that you are either claiming Jesus doesn't support the Bible or you are being disingenuous by claiming that Jesus did not speak those words but did support the same concept.

Everything «good» that religion claims can be done full well without it in the first place — things such as charity and compassion.

BUT... if the Church is going to claim and treat sexual deviance (if in fact that is what they believe it is) with such force over and against all other indiscretions, how do they justify that... and how isn't it hypocritical of them when they simply wink at other things that are clearly outlined by Jesus» own words as grievous.

Numbskulls who make these statements are so dim they don't realize that making such a claim indicts them!

Finally, I don't think I need to offer statistics to address such claims as women are «taking control of everything» and «starting to dominate» among «doctors, lawyers, bankers, accountants.»

Jesus didn't «love» his persecutors; there is nothing whatsoever in the bible that supports such a claim.

And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or argument for / about god doesn't show they make any positive claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.

I make no such claims... you do.

As for the insults, you might wish to skip the hypocrisy when it is you who claimed that without religion there can be no morals, simply power - you insult many by making such a ludicrous claim and you fail to comprehend that there are only 2 billion Christians in this world... does that make the remaining 5 billion immoral?

Actually you did claim that basically God the Father and of the Bible as well as Jesus Christ you did not believe in which is why I went by you not believeing in such a God.

How can you make such an ignorant and blatant «over-generalization'to claim this fallacious If / then logic which goes like this... (If) you disrespect (a)(muslim)... (THEN)(they) kill 3,000 people., blah blah, blah... So... If I should go out and disrespect a muslim, which I wouldn't do, but if I would (hypothetically speaking) 3,000 people are going to die...?

Falk wrote that the book contains many incorrect claims such as «Meyer correctly concluded that no RNA molecule had ever been evolved in a test tube which could do more than join two building blocks together.

They claim it's a life changing experience, that their god is so powerful yet history has repeatedly shown it does no such thing because let's face it if they truly followed the teachings of their Christ, this world and specifically America would be a very different place.

If believers have been wrong in the past when they claimed God did something, they could be just as wrong in claiming God did something else, such as create the universe.

Stating something is «true» is not impressive, making such a statement does not rise above a «claim».

Does it serve her, this community or the subjects of her claims to promote such an outworking of animus in such a public forum?

They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations in insurance claims for loss of body parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth of a human being, the lowered crime rate would not come near justifying the number of abortions.

Doug had nothing to do with it, so I'm not sure why you've heard he has allegedly claimed such.

Personal Attack on John Musick # 4: «Does it serve her, this community or the subjects of her claims to promote such an outworking of animus in such a public forum?»

Even judicial «originalists» do not claim that the Court can be or should be entirely indifferent to such legislative expressions.