Sentences with phrase «such claims pointed»

Not exact matches

Fortune pointed to the quarterly report Tesla had filed just three days after the crash, warning that»... we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected resulting in personal injury or death,» and specifically calling out Autopilot as a technology that could result in such claims and materially affect financial performance.

Many people pointed out that Roku has a powerful multi-service search function (the company claims to include more than 100 providers) while others highlighted useful third - party search options such as reelworld.com and canistream.it

his whole point was that those who * feign * humility in claiming «no one can make such exclusive claims» are actually DOING the very thing to which they're objecting.

But yeah... I will point out the silliness of any statement claiming that such a belief is in any way «testable».

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Rosemary Ruether and other sympathetic but critical scholars have noted this point as observers of such groups; Goldenberg, Christ and Daly have made the claim from within their movement.

In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

No other structure in the world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made in the name of some nation, race, social class, religion, or ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

Rather, each one points out how legalization of such practices would achieve a goal that is the opposite of the one its supporters claim it would.

but the point is this: is it logical to claim one group has such grand sophistication while * simultaneously * arguing for that level of naiveté?

We recognize that Jesus is telling a story to illustrate a moral point, and that such stories often don't claim to correspond to actual events.

Elsewhere, Berger elaborates by pointing out that religions provide legitimation and meaning in a distinctly «sacred» mode, that they offer claims about the nature of ultimate reality as such, about the location of the human condition in relation to the cosmos itself.

Nicodemus, for all his claims to be a religious expert, is very literal in his understanding of Jesus» saying about being born again, and points out the physical impossibility of such a thing.

Northrop observed such a confluence, and held that Whitehead and Berg - son differed only on one major point of doctrine: he alleges that, for Bergson, spatialization in science constitutes a falsification of experience, while he thinks this is not the case for Whitehead.30 There are two problems with this claim by Northrop.

The claim that one can get all this by starting with such an openness to other points of view may seem surprising, and perhaps altogether incredible.

Lanzetta also points to abusive claims after the Council of «a material completeness of the Bible» by theologians such as Hans Kung.

I want to weep when there's a disaster and people are hurt or die and some self - described Christian personality claims that God made it happen to punish X because of Y. Unfortunately there are people who are gullible enough to believe such drivel to the point of sending the drivel masters money so they can continue to spout their nonsense.

It's ironic because you said that creationist have no evidence to support their claims but you mentioned organizations that find such evidence And again their point is that history and science will not contradict the Bible

Religious people in disguise like to call themselves «spiritual,» while claiming religion is toxic or poison in itself, without realizing that such spiritual beliefs and behaviorally based controls are the POINT of religions in the beginning.

However, despite the directive to «respect their point of view» he marginalizes such dissent by claiming that the «majority of Americans... have come to a consensus» and that the «proper course has become clear».

The question which immediately arises at this point is whether causal objectification as such can substantiate the claim that objectified actual entities are to be conceived not merely as superjects but subjects as well.

I have read far more history books than I have read the bible... and those that point to the murderousness of religion lack the knowledge to back such a claim.

In Lamech's claim to the right of revenge «seventy and sevenfold,» (Genesis 4:23 - 24) we have the historic starting point for a study of the growing ideal of forgiveness, and the first step up from such unrestricted vengeance was the adoption of retaliation as a substitute.

This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth about the universe, about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».

Yet, as was pointed out, Hawking and Mlodinow already concede that, for their ideas to work, a law such as gravity has to exist, and thus their «spontaneous creation» is not as «spontaneous» as they claim.

So canned and promiscuous a characterization does precisely what progressives such as Mrs. Clinton claim the bigots do: generalize and demonize others to the point of dehumanization.

It's easy to point fingers and claim causation, but such assumptions and mud slinging as we see in these comments are why we have a problem in this country.

There is a role for pointing out the higher education and IQ of atheists, such as when Christians wrongly claim the opposite or when discussing analytic skills and education, but is not, in itself, an argument for atheism.

And Sheehan also claims that «it is clear that the narrative does indeed point beyond itself» — not, however, to an alleged happening in the past, since «the story's purpose is precisely to show that such past «events» do not bring about faith» (p. 144).

This is why Jesus could say such radical things as; «If you see me, you see the Father» (Jn.14: 9) and could claim that all Scripture points to him (Jn 5:39 - 45; Lk 24: 25 - 7; 44 - 7).

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

If we need evidence to back up such a claim, we only need to go back as recently as the Liverpool game earlier this month where he produced a stunning save to ensure his side picked up a crucial point at Anfield.

Or more to the point, why believe such an expansive claim?

It doesn't point to a specific claim, and then asks whether all such claims use or ignore wireless access.

However, there are points in every parliament's lifecycle when no government can lay claim to such support — between parliamentary dissolution and a general election; after a general election and before the new government is formed; or when an incumbent government loses the confidence of parliament.

Opponents of Corbyn have hit back at such claims by pointing to the current leader's dire personal approval ratings.

The government also pointed to the 14 New York State legislators convicted of on federal public corruption charges — including Skelos» three immediate predecessors — over the past decade, claiming a «dire need» to deter such conduct.

As is usual at such events, the witnesses and senators generally adhered to their talking points, mostly claiming that there's a technical talent shortage that requires admitting more workers from overseas.

Others, like me, are convinced that no theoretical or empirical evidence exists for such a claim, and that a widespread belief in the existence of such a point of no return threatens to push ecological science and its application in the wrong direction.

Others point out that such a claim is hard to prove because the same factors that lead people to use marijuana in the first place might also lead them to use other drugs.

The point of my [1992 book] What Robots Can and Can't Be can be distilled to this stark but, by my lights, accurate claim: We are sliding inexorably toward a time when AI will supply — despite demanding tests of «unmasking» [like the movie's Voight — Kampff test]-- creatures behaviorally indistinguishable from human persons, such as Blade Runner's replicants.

There have been similar claims for an extensive plane of dwarf galaxies about our own Milky Way Galaxy, with some claiming that the existence of such strange structures points to a failing in our understanding of the fundamental nature of the Universe.

The fossils form such a neatly graded series, getting less and less ape - like and more and more human as they get closer in time to the present, that the most earnest creationist can do little more than muddy the waters by inflating and distorting the existence of points of disagreement between specialists, or trying to revive long since discredited Homo sapiens specimens once claimed to have been from extremely ancient deposits.

Such claims, they point out, are often based on estimates of «disease - specific mortality,» which measures how likely a person is to die from a particular disease within a particular window.

At one point, for example, it was even thought that digital music players, such as iPods, could interfere with pacemakers; later studies — including one by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — later refuted that claim.

In addition, it's also worth pointing out that the symptoms claimed for «adrenal fatigue» are significantly more common occurrences in regular healthy people, and are not specific to low cortisol states or people with chronic fatigue issues, such as weight gain, cravings for sugary foods, anxiety, waking up tired, and trouble sleeping.

Your message should be clear and to - the - point., free of gimmicks and fillers, such as exaggerated claims.

Supporters also point to high test scores, but the editorial claims «there is no way to accurately compare voucher [sic] students with Florida public school students» because the latter are required to take the state achievement test while the former are required to take one of several national achievement tests, such as the Stanford Achievement Test or PSAT.