Sentences with phrase «such cognitive dissonance»

What's odd is that people are having such cognitive dissonance over this phenomenon that they ignore evidence in plain view.

I thought you were asking how we could have such cognitive dissonance!

Not exact matches

A cognitive dissonance occurs over sampling sizes in quantitative areas such as market research.

The level of cognitive dissonance amongst the fundamentalist set is such that any and all inconsistencies are quickly rationalized away.

Could it be that you have been experiencing some cognitive dissonance with being a believer and a high view of scripture whilst advocating the pointing finger where the bible here places such action in the same light as oppression.

You seem to be a somewhat reasonable person, and I presume the cognitive dissonance that is required to defend what can not be defended logically prohibits you from even contemplating such a proposition seriously.

nonetheless, such atheism — for lack of an objective moral anchor — still suffers from a similar cognitive dissonance.

That assumes a level of cynicism that may be cultivated by a Mitt Romney, but probably not many rank - and - file conservatives, who either don't know this, or suffer from such extreme cognitive dissonance that it doesn't effect their thinking.

As the Father saw fit to provide Paul (and us) a certain «cognitive dissonance» as regards the sarx and pneuma — even as He provided such dissonance -LRB-?)

We would not tolerate for one second a human father who behaves in such a sick, sadistic manner, so I don't understand how Pastor and other Christians are able to overcome the cognitive dissonance of excusing this same behavior in their God?

World views, religious and otherwise, are often self - contained tautological constructs, and as such capable of supporting a lot of cognitive dissonance.

Cognitive dissonance is a better descriptor for an internal state, although we should remember that all such descriptions are inferences from behavior, language, brain scans, and so on, not direct observations of someone else's mind.

The only other parting shot I could get in was that I've found that people with children are less likely to believe in GW, than people without children, because GW is such a horrible problem to contemplate for future generations that there's a huge cognitive dissonance about it (I haven't done a study, it's only my sense of things); the man has three small children.

It is no mystery to me why we gain no traction with some people such as Mr. Caruba who, apparently, has the worst case of cognitive dissonance I've ever seen.

That is to say, instead of asking and arguing against what someone says, it is much easier to say they are suffering a «cognitive dissonance» or other such woo.

Heh, your «nuance» such as it contradictorily was, merely illustrates cognitive dissonance.

Having only been to this site a couple of times in the past, I'm not aware of the moderation policy but am surprised to see such accusations as accusing someone of «cognitive dissonance / deceit» (based, as far as I can see, on the poster's own interpretation of someone else's words) being allowed.

But very few questions seem to be asked when psychologists pronounce on the limitations of individual's psychology, based on their own understanding of climate science: the «facts» it supplies to them, such that they can detect «cognitive dissonance».

It's tragic to see a supposed «scientist» in such a confused state of cognitive dissonance: