The court found
no such compelling state interest.
Not exact matches
Under the free - exercise clause every person is entitled to respect for her or his religious commitments, and their free exercise should not be burdened by governmental interference except to secure «
compelling state interests» (
such as protection of public health and safety, not just public welfare or order) that can be served in no less burdensome way.
Indeed, by allowing parents to meet the compulsory school attendance requirement by sending their children to private institutions that espouse the second approach, the
State tacitly acknowledges that its «
compelling interest» in education is adequately served in
such schools.
Even though respondents had a legitimate expectation of privacy in their e-mails, they could still be disclosed if
such disclosure served a «
compelling state interest.»
As a result, the
state has a
compelling interest in facilitating the transaction between an individual and an insurer, as well as regulating that insurance product in
such a way that there are reasonable odds of the insurance product offering the kind and amount of coverage that the
state expects people to have available for the benefit of others to whom they may cause injury.