Sentences with phrase «such conjectures»

Would the uncertainties attached to these cause such conjectures to be considered as science were it not for the context of GW?

Initially, there was some conjecture as to whether such an event might be considered illegal under the constitution but such conjecture dissipated and in light of the rousing success of this match Fenerbahçe is moving forward with plans to limit a certain section of the stadium, comprising 470 seats, to women only.

Not exact matches

I have read statements from his peers in the past saying that there is inconclusive evidence in regards to age old mysteries, and I respect him for standing firm with what he believes, but I would expect someone with such a scientific background to have more than conjecture to back their claims.

If God entertains such a propositional feeling, we may conjecture that the new occasion prehends God in terms of this propositional feeling about itself and does so with a subjective form of appetition conformal to that of God.

But (conjecture on my part) any moral standard acceptable to almost anyone would call such acts evil.

However the case for the existence of the conjectured «outline» really requires for its proof some such objective indication of its existence as would be provided by Mark following it in his narrative.

The only thing quoted is «any such artifact to their door,» the rest of the statement is conjecture and doesn't make reference to the sign I mentioned.

This, as Maritain acknowledged, is a bold conjecture, since it has no support in Scripture or tradition, and contradicts the usual understanding of texts such as the parable of the Last Judgment scene of Matthew.

We shall now attempt such a «synoptic» reading of selected biblical images and relevant process - relational concepts to try this conjecture.

But with such vague conjectures we have no concern at present, for our interest lies with the faculty rather than with its organic seat.

(This will also involve an affirmative answer to a question posed by Donald W. Sherburne, namely, whether these Whiteheadian «conjectures» could «provide a systematic, rational framework capable of grounding the many insights into the relation of «mind» and «body» which have emerged from the reflections of such phenomenologists as Merleau - Ponty» [WPP 406].)

Super small beings of intelligence, building and maintaining molecular machinery within all megalithic life formations may well be considered ID yet to think of such issues outside the veins of rudimentary sciences is where debates of, are to be made manifestations for thought inspired conjectures.

Up to a comparatively recent date such distinctions as those between what has been verified and what is only conjectured, between the impersonal and the personal aspects of existence, were hardly suspected or conceived.

But the imminent retirement of such a spectacular star and such a reticent star was bound to cause all kinds of conjecture.

It is a matter of conjecture as to why and how Barcelona could let go such a great artist of transfers!

But such estimates are not evidence, either; they are conjecture.

Such paradoxes are what led Stephen Hawking to propose his «chronology protection conjecture».

Sensing technology confers the ability to recognize such issues early, replacing speculation and conjecture with verifiable information about how people interact at work.

Such claims are an obfuscating amalgam of theory and conjecture, reality and fantasy, nonfiction and science fiction.

The twin - prime conjecture, often attributed to the Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria, posits that there is an infinite number of such pairs.

From the fossil and sediment records, Tarduno and his team were able to conjecture that the bird's environment in the Canadian Arctic during the Turonian age would have been characterized by volcanic activity, a calm freshwater bay, temperatures comparable to those in northern Florida today, and creatures such as turtles, large freshwater fish, and champsosaurs — now - extinct, crocodile - like reptiles.

Never mind a delay of weeks or months — pity poor Thomas Hales, an American mathematician who has been waiting for five years to hear whether the mathematical community has accepted his 1998 proof of astronomer Johannes Kepler's 390 - year - old conjecture that the most efficient way to pack equal - size spheres (such as cannonballs on a ship, which is how the question arose) is to stack them in the familiar pyramid fashion that greengrocers use to stack oranges on a counter.

It provides a potentially minimal framework in which it is possible to solve the Einstein equations, which in turn could be a critical step toward the proof of major conjectures, such as Penrose's cosmic censorship conjectures.

Some theorists have conjectured that finite pieces of such walls could exist in the real universe and provide local repulsion.

Such a proposal is not merely pie - in - the - sky conjecturing.

For a long time, this conjecture seemed no more than a historical curiosity — it has no direct applications outside pure mathematics — but it was such a simple question that mathematicians found themselves irresistibly drawn to it.

Additionally, Molecular fossils (or fingerprints) based on atom ratios in Archaean sediments is highly contencious, but scientifically critical, since such subtle molecular traces found in Australia has led to conjecture that microorganisms with nuclei appeared before 3.8 Ba.

These people will probably spend months conjecturing in movie forums about what a genius Night is for such things as having every prominent supporting character's name start with a letter «J» (Julian, Jess, Josh, Jared, Joey, Jake, and Mrs. Jones).

As mathematics teachers think about teaching with technology, they should concurrently consider how to teach mathematical concepts in such a way that students can experiment with ideas, make conjectures, test hypotheses, and form generalizations.

There is much conjecture on how the Maya developed such an accurate calendar.

As such, it's impossible to take your conjecture seriously, because you say definitively that it will be the case, despite 4 decades of evidence pointing to something counter, and you do absolutely nothing to back it up with anything beyond hyperbole.

It is interesting to conjecture on the potential form remaking such an exhibition might entail.

In works reflecting her interests in astronomy, such as the vibrantly colored «The Conjecture» (2007), drippy but dense watercolor is used to impart a sense of bodies moving in different dimensions.

Where, on the span between scientific advance and pointless conjecture materialized should we place an oddity such as Jakob Ottonowitsch von Narkiewitsch - Jodko's «A Spark Captured on the Surface of the Body of a Well - Washed Prostitute» (1895)?

In chapter 1, Wainwright describes how theorists such as Hall, Mercer, and Gilroy have searched for and conjectured a «diaspora (or black) aesthetics» through the implementation of cultural semiotics, and contends that even they betray an understanding of the limitations of such an analytical model.

I realize of course that this is conjecture, and other explanations such as e.g. stochastic behavior or modulation by other modes of variability are perhaps more likely to be correct.

My conjecture — and yes, I realize that it is only a conjecture — is that such a variable may exhibit excursions, in response to the delta forcing, that overshoot its ultimate equilibrium values, as a result of the responses and feedbacks mentioned above.

Much as I would welcome a cogent explanation for the widespread, but only spottily coherent, multi-decadal variations, Wyatt's «stadium wave» conjecture doesn't provide such.

One gets such wholesome returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.»

back in 1859» — but then the greenhouse effect conjecture was itself disproved back in 2003 such as in a peer - reviewed journal paper like Dr Hans Jelbring's http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/EnviroPhilo/FunctionOfMass.pdf

Such was their wholesale catastrophic conjecture, published in a top journal, based on etching in 14 specimens.

Many times you write in such general terms that when you are confronted with instrument records that contradict your speculations, you shift to paleoclimatological timeframes, and then when confronted with paleoclimatological reconstruction data that refute your conjecture, you rely on the generality of your writings to claim it wasn't what you meant.

I notice that in blogs such as this one, the topic of the identity of the statistical events underlying the conjecture does not arise unless I introduce it into the discussion.

What is interesting is that people want to reject this conjecture for no reason except that it is such.

Lets concentrate on such things which actually have some physics to support the conjecture.

Skeptics call such assertions «conjectures» unless they are accompanied by testable evidence.

Two of the admirable features of the paper that deserve more notice are: (a) conjectures are clearly labelled as such before their consequences are worked out; (b) there is a fulsome (if perhaps non-exhaustive — I can't tell) discussion of uncertainties.

One gets such wholesome returns of conjectures out of such trifling investment of fact».

Such a use of mathematics is sometimes called «heuristic» (meaning leading in a useful direction), «hypothesis generation», «the context of discovery» (vs. the context of testing), or «conjecture».

Clearly, this conjecture needs further research to clarify, but this result is consistent with other research that has found considerable benefits to early childhood education programs such as Head Start.