Not exact matches
«Any payment by a person
such as Cohen on behalf of or in
consultation with a candidate to influence an election is an in - kind «contribution'to the candidate under campaign finance law subject to a $ 2,700 limit and disclosure
requirements,» he said.
Any payment by a person
such as Cohen on behalf of or in
consultation with a candidate to influence an election is an in - kind «contribution» to the candidate under campaign finance law subject to a $ 2,700 limit and disclosure
requirements.
In modifying or omitting
such a
requirement on the basis of infeasibility, the Administrator, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall ensure, with an adequate margin of safety, the integrity of international offset credits issued under this section and of the greenhouse gas emissions cap established pursuant to section 703.
-- In promulgating regulations under subsection (b)(1) with respect to the issuance of international offset credits under subsection (c), (d), or (e), the Administrator, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, may modify or omit a
requirement of this part (excluding the
requirements of this section) if the Administrator determines that the application of that
requirement to
such subsection is not feasible.
-- The Secretary of Transportation shall require the appropriate person to develop a plan for carrying out this subparagraph that reflects
consultation with individuals with disabilities affected by
such plan and that establishes milestones for achievement of the
requirements of this subparagraph.
-- On the application of a State or local government, the Attorney General may, in
consultation with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, and after prior notice and a public hearing at which persons, including individuals with disabilities, are provided an opportunity to testify against
such certification, certify that a State law or local building code or similar ordinance that establishes accessibility
requirements meets or exceeds the minimum
requirements of this Act for the accessibility and usability of covered facilities under this title.
This was the first occasion that the Supreme Court (or indeed the House of Lords) has considered the
requirements of a lawful
consultation and as
such will be the leading case on this area of law.
There are of course other obligations and protections which derive from EU law,
such as the Data Protection Act 1998, and collective redundancy
consultation requirements.
Evidence Code technology wasted and still needed: in 1976 - 77, I conducted an extensive national
consultation process with judges and lawyers for the federal Department of Justice as to replacing legislation
such as the Canada Evidence Act, and the binding
requirement of existing case law, with the Evidence Code that was proposed by the (LRCC's) Law Reform Commission of Canada's Report on Evidence (December 1975).