Sentences with phrase «such differences in treatment»

He came to the conclusion that, according to the settled case - law of the Court and in line with Article 52 (1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, such a difference in treatment is only justifiable when it relates to a legally permitted aim pursued by the legislation in question, and is proportionate to the aim pursued by the treatment concerned.

As to the second question, the Court held that the PTWD must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes, for the purpose of access to the pension scheme, national law from establishing a distinction between full - time judges and part - time judges remunerated on a daily fee - paid basis, unless such a difference in treatment is justified by objective reasons, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.

Not exact matches

This difference is partly due to differences in the treatment of specific components of earnings such as interest, tax and depreciation, and in company coverage.

It continued: «We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion, and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child.

«It is based on what we are discovering about the tremendous variety we see even in one disease such as DCIS, and how we must design our future treatments to more precisely reflect those differences.»

Spark CEO Jeff Marrazzo says their more potent vector and differences in how the treatment is made, such as the company's use of a surfactant to make sure the vector doesn't stick to the vial when the surgeon injects it, may result in a higher dose of the RPE65 gene getting into retinal cells and long - lasting effects.

Even simple differences such as how big they are at birth correlate with differences in how they respond to drug treatment,» said senior study author Bree Aldridge, Ph.D., assistant professor of molecular biology and microbiology at Tufts University School of Medicine and adjunct assistant professor of biomedical engineering at Tufts University School of Engineering.

In the current study, a number of prognostic factors such as age, stage, comorbidity, hormonal receptor and HER2 status and differences in systemic treatments (medication after surgery) were included and considered as possible explanations for the previously reported survival differences between BCT and mastectomIn the current study, a number of prognostic factors such as age, stage, comorbidity, hormonal receptor and HER2 status and differences in systemic treatments (medication after surgery) were included and considered as possible explanations for the previously reported survival differences between BCT and mastectomin systemic treatments (medication after surgery) were included and considered as possible explanations for the previously reported survival differences between BCT and mastectomy.

How much of this difference stems from unequal access to health care, such as regular screening and aggressive treatment, and how much is rooted in biology?

One thing patients notice just a few weeks into treatment is a marked improvement in energy levels, and it is such a difference that it seems to speed up the rest of the process.

Such treatment may be require more time and effort, but in the long run will make all the difference in your health, longevity, and quality of life.

Scar tissue treatment is one of the areas that is often forgotten about in rehab, and makes such a big difference to your recovery.

It took five treatments and made such a huge difference in the way my skin looked.

A number of possibilities were considered, such as differences in the infilling method and treatments of sea ice, without a clear answer emerging.

[First category:] Characteristics such as race, caste, noble birth, membership of a political party and gender, are seldom, if ever, acceptable grounds for differences in treatment... But [second category:] the Strasbourg court has given it a wide interpretation [to Art 14], approaching that of the 14th Amendment, and it is therefore necessary, as in the United States, to distinguish between those grounds of discrimination which prima facie appear to off end our notions of the respect due to the individual and those which merely require some rational justification.»

A difference of treatment based on a person's religion or belief in the context of occupational activities within such organisations

Choice of law and forum, differences in treatment of secured and priority creditors, differences in legal systems and cultures, conflicts of law, competing claims of jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement by one country of rulings and judgments entered in another country are just a few of the challenges likely to arise in many such proceedings.

This states that differences in treatment based on religion can be justified where «by reason of the nature of the particular occupational activities concerned or of the context in which they are carried out, such a characteristic constitutes a genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is legitimate and the requirement proportionate.»

As such, and bearing in mind that «Not every difference in treatment... constitutes «discrimination» under the Charter», the Court found no reasonable claim under s. 15.

Notwithstanding Article 2 (1) and (2), Member States may provide that a difference of treatment which is based on a characteristic related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 shall not constitute discrimination where, by reason of the nature of the particular occupational activities concerned or of the context in which they are carried out, such a characteristic constitutes a genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is legitimate and the requirement is proportionate.

59 As several of the governments which have filed observations have pointed out, the opposite interpretation would lead to unjustifiable differences in treatment between Member States, according to how their national social security systems are organised, given that the «special» nature of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings — and, as a consequence, the fact that it falls within the scope of Regulation No 883/2004 — depends, inter alia, on whether the grant of that benefit is based, under national law, on objective criteria or solely on the state of need of the person concerned.

Cecilia Saulters - Tubbs found that district attorneys were less likely to file charges against female drug offenders than against male offenders, while Donna Bishop and Charles Frazier found, similarly, that boys were treated more punitively than girls for delinquency offenses and that girls were less likely than boys to receive a sentence involving incarceration.10 Such studies suggest that the system treats girls as less criminally dangerous than boys.11 Other research, however, notes that once legal variables are controlled, girls are treated similarly to boys in the early stages of court processing but more harshly in the later stages.12 Earlier studies pointing toward more «chivalrous» treatment of girls may thus have failed to consider differences in the underlying seriousness of the offenses involved.

Although there are limitations to our pilot studies such as differences in the samples, treatment settings, variations in the treatment itself and the use of different measures, which may have influenced outcome, they are a starting point for describing and evaluating inpatient treatment for BPD in naturalistic settings.

Under this approach, not every difference in treatment in society will constitute discrimination, if the criteria for such differentiation can be justified as legitimate under the particular treaty.

A study of individual cognitive therapy for bipolar disorder showed positive outcomes at 1 - year follow - up, but the benefits were reduced over time, suggesting the need for booster sessions to sustain the gains.19 As with many forms of therapy, CBT has been found to be more successful in reducing relapse in the depressive pole compared with the manic pole.30 A large randomised trial of CBT showed no difference between CBT and treatment as usual, when all participants were included in the analyses.31 However, results of a post-hoc analysis suggested that CBT was effective for participants who reported fewer than 12 prior episodes of illness and were not acutely unwell when therapy began; numbers of episodes of mania rather than depression seemed to predict treatment response.32 Such data can help guide the clinical application of CBT for bipolar patients.

No such differences were found in the MBCT treatment condition.

When such speech is restricted because of its content, courts evaluate the regulation much more rigorously and in this case declared the ordinance unconstitutional because of the content - based difference in treatment.