Not exact matches
From a policy perspective, it is most accurate and I think
effective to refer to
such storing as «agricultural carbon sequestration» in
opposition to the industrial catch phrase «carbon sequestration» which refers to the business of going to impractical lengths and assuming a high degree of risk to bury CO2 in the earth's crust.
Civilian
opposition to
such false government propaganda, as AGW and von Weizsacker's «nuclear binding energy,» is the most
effective way to restore respect for the rights of citizens.
And I suspect that, done properly,
such strategies would be more
effective than the current clumsy and unprincipled approach — which merely provokes principled
opposition.