However, they too have found that
such error rates persist to an extent that still prohibits high - stakes decision making.
Given that distinctions between «implicit» and «explicit» are graduated rather than binary (things can be more, or less explicit)
such an error rate is unsurprising.
Not exact matches
Neither FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc nor its licensors accept any liability for any
errors or omissions in
such indices and / or
ratings or underlying data.
RIAs are eligible to participate in the Program if they represent to Fidelity Investments that they meet the following criteria: (1) RIA is an investment adviser registered and in good standing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and / or any applicable state securities regulatory authorities or is exempt from
such registration; (2) RIA's representatives who provide services to referred clients are appropriately registered / licensed as «Investment Advisers Representatives» in required jurisdictions; (3) RIA charges fee - based, asset - based, or flat -
rate investment advisory service fees (which may include hourly fees); (4) RIA will maintain a minimum of $ 350,000,000 in total regulatory assets under management, as reported in response to Item 5 in Part 1A of the RIA's Form ADV, throughout the duration of RIA's participation in the Program; (5) RIA and all associated persons of the RIA who manage client assets or who supervise
such associated persons shall at all times be covered through both
Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance and Fidelity Bond Coverage; and (6) RIA maintains a minimum of two principals or officers as well as a minimum of five employees.
(After all, if a 10 - 20 %
error rate hasn't prevented the widespread use of neurocognitive tests
such as ImPACT, why should it be any different with sensors?)
Under normal conditions,
such as without perfect lighting, a perfectly still camera and the person in the perfect pose — in other words, the real world in which we use our phones, publicly tested algorithms have only managed to get below an overall
error rate of around 5 per cent.
Corporate learning goals involve pushing the message of improvement in
such areas as sales stats, safety records,
error rates, compliance, customer service, profits, data breaches, and productivity.
But the
error rate of these «value - added measures» may be lower than the
error rate of classifications based on traditional measures of teacher effectiveness
such as licensure status or years of experience.
This «method» of «research» is so weak that it produced
errors throughout their entire original
rating report at
such a laughable
rate that the organization should be shunned by anyone who bothers to check their record.
However, FMCSA makes the use of ELDs mandatory for motor carriers who have more than a 10 %
error rate on their hours - of - service documentation (
such as log books).
The paper breaks down tracking
error into four components: (1) Difference in management fees (2) Transaction costs
such as commissions, bid - ask spreads and other administrative costs (3) Interest -
rate differential between Canadian and US exchange
rates and (4) Residual - Currency Effects (RCE).
The Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) helps fix credit card billing
errors by providing for the prompt correction of
errors on open - end credit accounts
such as department store credit cards and protects consumers» credit
ratings while they are settling disputes.
With
such high frame -
rates and razor thin margins for
error, the slop of an analog stick often adds insult to injury.
While they brought a few legitimate
errors in the IPCC's fourth assessment report to light —
such as the overestimate of the melt
rate of Himalayan glaciers — they often overplayed the significance of these
errors and trumpeted other
errors that weren't
errors at all.
Another paper criticized Wentz's analysis because he did not consider other factors which play a role in precipitation
such as global brightening during the period of study; and the
error bars in Wentz's estimate of the evaporation
rate increase was considerable.
Given the absence of any physical evidence (
such as actual testing of a float) that the floats are in
error, I'm perfectly willing to accept their data — which shows the oceans are losing heat at a
rate ~ 50 times as fast as they supposedly gained it over the last century.
5) Because we expect some
such errors as a matter of course, no amount of highlighting single abstracts being correctly
rated will show the Cook et al results to be false.
It is well known, and easilly established that the largest single group of
such mistakes is classifying
rating (1 - 3) articles as
rating (4) due to simple
error or insufficient information in the abstract and title, something we know by comparison with the author self
ratings.
With out quantification of the relevant ratios, and a projection of those ratios to determine the impact on the concensus
rate, listing cherry picked examples of
such errors is simply propaganda, haveing nothing to do with science.
This makes estimates of trend
rates from linear regression (or any other method, for that matter) less precise; the probable
error from
such an analysis is larger than it would be if the random parts of the data were uncorrelated.
What could possibly account for
such a high
error rate?
These injuries are often the result of
errors during the administration of anesthesia,
such as giving too much or too little anesthesia, failing to properly monitor the patient, or not recognizing complications as they are developing,
such as a rapid heart
rate, dangerously low blood pressure, or declining respiration.
Much of the discussion has forced attorneys and other laypersons (from the perspective of the science involved) to come to terms with concepts
such as recall and precision, confidence levels, confidence intervals, acceptable
error rates, false positives and negatives, statistical sampling, algorithms, and other rather involved topics.
Thus, the Court used the «reliability» factor which is at the heart of the gatekeeping process, but its decision was based essentially on the lack of reliability of the factual foundation of the testimony, rather than the Daubert factors
such as testability, publication,
error rate or general acceptance.
2786 (1993), the Supreme Court abandoned the «general acceptance» test as the sole determinant in admission of scientific expert testimony in favor of a broader examination, which included
such factors as whether the opinions have been or can be tested, whether they have been subjected to peer review or published, their
rate of
error, and their general acceptance in the field.
It doesn't deal with: (1) the great size and complexity of
such systems — they operate using tens of millions of lines of software code; (2) the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management; (3) the serious, and very common
errors in ERMSs; and, (4) the need for ERMS software with acceptable
error rates.
If there is an
error in underwriting,
such as the insured being given non smoker
rates when they admitted on the application that they smoked, the company will simply charge smoking
rates for the policy and remove the excess uncharged
rates from the policy proceeds.
Even if you are an older driver over the age of 55, your insurance
rates would go up as statistics show that
such drivers are more prone to commit judgmental
errors due to slower reflexes.
Good zero - day exploits have much better success
rates than social - engineering attacks,
such as email phishing, which rely on human
error.
While the overall
rate of
such problems may be low, where linked datasets are very large, and indigenous populations are relatively small, a low
rate of incorrect links or data entry
errors could make a substantial difference to the number of deaths reported after enhancement.